Psychological and social determinants of physical activity from diagnosis to remission among French cancer patients (PERTINENCE): protocol for a mixed-method study

Aurélie Van Hoye, Yacobou Omorou, Christine Rotonda, Sophie Gendarme, Cyril Tarquinio, Bastien Houtmann, Didier Peiffert, Raffaele Longo, Charles Martin-Krumm, Aurélie Van Hoye, Yacobou Omorou, Christine Rotonda, Sophie Gendarme, Cyril Tarquinio, Bastien Houtmann, Didier Peiffert, Raffaele Longo, Charles Martin-Krumm

Abstract

Background: Many effective physical activity (PA) interventions have focused on individual factors or a single theoretical model, limiting our understanding of the determinants of PA practice and their interactions in the cancer trajectory. The present mixed-method study aims to capture social and psychological determinants of PA practice from diagnosis to remission among cancer patients, and to identify key levers for PA practice.

Methods/design: A nested sequential mixed-method design QUAN (QUAL+QUAL) will be used, with qualitative studies embedded in the quantitative study to broaden our understanding of the determinants of PA practice. The design is sequential, since qualitative data on medical staff will be collected before patient inclusion (Phase 1), followed by quantitative patient data collection lasting one year (Phase 2) and a final qualitative data collection one year after inclusion (Phase 3). Phase 1 will be a case study in the two hospitals involved in the study, exploring knowledge of and support for PA practice among medical staff. Through interviews and documental analyses, the PA support dynamic will be evaluated with regard to PA prescription. Phase 2 will be a one-year observational study among 693 cancer patients. Quantitative medical, social, dispositional and psychological data, PA practices and preferences, will be collected at diagnosis, and six months and one year thereafter. Phase 3 will be a retrospective study, evaluating societal and policy factors, as well as unexpected factors playing a role in PA levels and preferences among cancer patients. For this phase thirty patients will be identified six months after inclusion on the basis of their PA profiles. Quantitative data will provide the main dataset, whilst qualitative data will complete the picture, enabling determinants of PA practice and their interactions to be captured throughout the cancer trajectory.

Discussion: The present study aims to identify key levers and typical trajectories for PA practice among cancer patients, adapted to different times in the course of cancer and taking into account "what works", "for whom", "where" and "how". The challenge is the tailoring of PA interventions to patients at different times in their cancer trajectory, and the implication of medical staff support.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial NCT03919149 , 18 April 2019. Prospectively registered.

Keywords: Cancer; Mixed method; Physical activity; Socio-ecological model.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Socio-ecological model used in present protocol
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram

References

    1. Ancellin R, Gaillot-de SJ. Bénéfices de l’activité physique pendant et après cancer: des connaissances scientifiques aux repères pratiquesBenefits of physical activity during and after cancer treatment. Oncologie. 2017;19(3–4):95–107.
    1. Fassier Philippine, Zelek Laurent, Partula Valentin, Srour Bernard, Bachmann Patrick, Touillaud Marina, Druesne-Pecollo Nathalie, Galan Pilar, Cohen Patrice, Hoarau Hélène, Latino-Martel Paule, Menai Mehdi, Oppert Jean-Michel, Hercberg Serge, Deschasaux Mélanie, Touvier Mathilde. Variations of physical activity and sedentary behavior between before and after cancer diagnosis. Medicine. 2016;95(40):e4629.
    1. Touillaud M, Foucaut A-M, Berthouze S, Reynes E, Kempf-Lépine A, Carretier J, et al. Design of a randomised controlled trial of adapted physical activity during adjuvant treatment for localised breast cancer: the PASAPAS feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(10):e003855.
    1. Doyle C, Kushi LH, Byers T, Courneya KS, Demark-Wahnefried W, Grant B, et al. Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: an American Cancer Society guide for informed choices. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56(6):323–353.
    1. Irwin M, ACoS M. ACSM's guide to exercise and cancer survivorship: Human Kinetics. 2012.
    1. Cramp FA, Byron-Daniel J. Exercise for the management of cancer related fatigue in adults. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012;11(131).
    1. Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM. Relationship between exercise pattern across the cancer experience and current quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. J Altern Complement Med. 1997;3(3):215–226.
    1. Midtgaard J, Baadsgaard MT, Møller T, Rasmussen B, Quist M, Andersen C, et al. Self-reported physical activity behaviour; exercise motivation and information among Danish adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009;13(2):116–121.
    1. Speck RM, Courneya KS, Mâsse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH. An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(2):87–100.
    1. Stacey FG, James EL, Chapman K, Courneya KS, Lubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(2):305–338.
    1. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380(9838):258–271.
    1. Lynch BM, Boyle T, Winkler E, Occleston J, Courneya KS, Vallance JK. Patterns and correlates of accelerometer-assessed physical activity and sedentary time among colon cancer survivors. Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27(1):59–68.
    1. Berendes D, Keefe FJ, Somers TJ, Kothadia SM, Porter LS, Cheavens JS. Hope in the context of lung cancer: relationships of hope to symptoms and psychological distress. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;40(2):174–182.
    1. Ho S, Rajandram RK, Chan N, Samman N, McGrath C, Zwahlen RA. The roles of hope and optimism on posttraumatic growth in oral cavity cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(2):121–124.
    1. Jafari E, Najafi M, Sohrabi F, Dehshiri GR, Soleymani E, Heshmati R. Life satisfaction, spirituality well-being and hope in cancer patients. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;5:1362–1366.
    1. Ntoumanis N, Edmunds J, Duda JL. Understanding the coping process from a self-determination theory perspective. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(2):249–260.
    1. Vallerand RJ. The psychology of passion: a dualistic model: series in positive psychology. 2015.
    1. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Coping and adaptation. The handbook of behavioral medicine. 1984;282325.
    1. Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, Holmes MD, Kawachi I. Social networks, social support, and remission after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(7):1105–1111.
    1. Szymlek-Gay EA, Richards R, Egan R. Physical activity among cancer survivors: a literature review. N Z Med J. 2011;124(1337):1–13.
    1. Wold B, Mittelmark MB. Health-promotion research over three decades: The social-ecological model and challenges in implementation of interventions. Scandinavian journal of public health. 2018;46(20_suppl):20–26.
    1. Golden SD, Earp JAL. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39(3):364–372.
    1. Sallis James F., Glanz Karen. The Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Eating, and Obesity in Childhood. The Future of Children. 2006;16(1):89–108.
    1. Buffart L, Galvão DA, Brug J, Chinapaw M, Newton RU. Evidence-based physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors: current guidelines, knowledge gaps and future research directions. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40(2):327–340.
    1. Dooris M. Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness. Health Promot Int. 2006;21(1):55–65.
    1. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research: Wiley online library. 2007.
    1. Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field methods. 2006;18(1):3–20.
    1. Guével M-R, Pommier J. Recherche par les méthodes mixtes en santé publique: enjeux et illustration. Sante publique. 2012;24(1):23–38.
    1. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research: sage. 2003.
    1. Stake RE. Multiple case study analysis: Guilford press. 2013.
    1. Noy C. Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2008;11(4):327–344.
    1. Whiting Lisa S. Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers. Nursing Standard. 2008;22(23):35–40.
    1. De Vries T, Henning R, Hogerzeil HV, Fresle D, Policy M, Organization WH . Guide to good prescribing: a practical manual. 1994.
    1. Kim RB, Phillips A, Herrick K, Helou M, Rafie C, Anscher MS, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior of cancer survivors and non-cancer individuals: results from a national survey. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57598.
    1. Blanchard CM, Denniston MM, Baker F, Ainsworth SR, Courneya KS, Hann DM, et al. Do adults change their lifestyle behaviors after a cancer diagnosis? Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(3):246–256.
    1. Manneville F, Rotonda C, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Guillemin F, Omorou AY. The impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life during and after adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Cancer. 2018;124(4):797–806.
    1. Labbé É, Moulin JJ, Guéguen R, Sass C, Chatain C, Gerbaud L. Un indicateur de mesure de la précarité et de la «santé sociale»: le score EPICES. La Revue de l'Ires. 2007;1:3–49.
    1. Gana K, Daigre S, Ledrich J. Psychometric properties of the French version of the adult dispositional hope scale. Assessment. 2013;20(1):114–118.
    1. Herzberg PY, Glaesmer H, Hoyer J. Separating optimism and pessimism: a robust psychometric analysis of the revised life orientation test (LOT-R) Psychol Assess. 2006;18(4):433.
    1. Snyder C, Irving LM, Anderson JR. Hope and health. Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective. 1991;162:285–305.
    1. Vallerand RJ, Rousseau FL, Grouzet FM, Dumais A, Grenier S, Blanchard CM. Passion in sport: a look at determinants and affective experiences. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2006;28(4):454–478.
    1. Gillet N, Rosnet E, Vallerand RJ. Development of a range of basic needs in sport context. Canadian Journal Of Behavioural Science-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement. 2008;40(4):230–237.
    1. Boiché J, Gourlan M, Trouilloud D, Sarrazin P. Development and validation of the ‘echelle de motivation envers l’Activité physique en contexte de Santé’: a motivation scale towards health-oriented physical activity in French. J Health Psychol. 2016;1359105316676626.
    1. Razavi D, Delvaux N, Farvacques C, Robaye E. Validation de la version française du HADS dans une population de patients cancéreux hospitalisés. Revue de psychologie appliquée. 1989.
    1. Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(6):790–804.
    1. Blaney J, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey J. Cancer survivors' exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire–survey. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(1):186–194.
    1. Jung T, Wickrama K. An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2(1):302–317.
    1. MacDonald DJ, Horton S, Kraemer K, Weir P, Deakin JM, Côté J. Application and reliability of the retrospective interview procedure to trace physical activity patterns in master athletes and nonactive older adults. Educ Gerontol. 2009;35(12):1107–1122.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera