Taking care of volunteers in a stroke trial: a new assisted-management strategy

Amber C Stuart, Jason J Sico, Catherine M Viscoli, Ashis H Tayal, Silvio E Inzucchi, Gary A Ford, Karen L Furie, Robert Cote, J David Spence, David Tanne, Walter N Kernan, Amber C Stuart, Jason J Sico, Catherine M Viscoli, Ashis H Tayal, Silvio E Inzucchi, Gary A Ford, Karen L Furie, Robert Cote, J David Spence, David Tanne, Walter N Kernan

Abstract

Background and purpose: Providing participants with evidence-based care for secondary prevention is an ethical and scientific priority for trials in stroke therapy. The optimal strategy, however, is uncertain. We report the performance of a new approach for delivering preventive care to trial participants.

Methods: Participants were enrolled in the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke trial, which examined the insulin sensitiser, pioglitazone versus placebo for prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Preventive care was the responsibility of the participants' personal healthcare providers, but investigators monitored care and provided feedback annually. We studied achievement of 8 prevention goals at baseline and 3 annual visits, with a focus on 3 priority goals: blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol <2.59 mmol/L and antithrombotic therapy.

Results: The proportion of participants achieving the priority goals was highest for antithrombotic use (96-99% in each year) and similar for blood pressure (66-72% in each year) and LDL (68-70% in each year). All 3 priority goals were achieved by 47-52% of participants in any given year. However, only 22% of participants achieved all 3 goals in each year.

Conclusions: A strategy of monitoring care and providing feedback was associated with high average yearly achievement of 3 priority secondary prevention goals, but the majority of trial participants did not persist in being at goal over time.

Trial registration number: NCT00091949.

Keywords: ischemic stroke; risk factors; secondary prevention; transient ischemic attack.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JJS reports personal fees from Acorda Therapeutics. CMV has a consulting agreement with Takeda to examine selected IRIS data. SEI reports personal fees from Merck, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Intarcia, Lexicon, Poxel, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca, and other support from Takeda outside the IRIS trial. In addition, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Abbott, Merck and Sanofi have provided continuing medical education (CME) funding to SEI employer, Yale University, for projects in which he has been involved. GAF reports personal fees from Lundbeck, Cerevast, Pfizer, Athersys, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi Sankyo.

References

    1. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191–4.
    1. Belsky L, Richardson HS. Medical researchers’ ancillary clinical care responsibilities. BMJ 2004;328:1494–6.
    1. Richardson HS, Belsky L. The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers. An ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects. Hastings Cent Rep 2004;34:25–33.
    1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Turan TN, et al. , SAMMPRIS Investigators. Design of the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;20:357–68.
    1. Diener HC, Sacco R, Yusuf S, et al. , Steering Committee; PRoFESS Study Group. Rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two antithrombotic regimens (a fixed-dose combination of extended-release dipyridamole plus ASA with clopidogrel) and telmisartan versus placebo in patients with strokes: the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial (PRoFESS). Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:368–80.
    1. Grubb RL, Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. . The carotid occlusion surgery study. Neurosurg Focus 2003;14:e9
    1. Spence JD, Howard VJ, Chambless LE, et al. . Vitamin intervention for stroke prevention (VISP) trial: rationale and design. Neuroepidemiology 2001;20:16–25.
    1. Mohr JP, Thompson JLP, Lazar RM, et al. . A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1444–51.
    1. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomized trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Lancet 2001;358:1033–41.
    1. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan AS, et al. . SPARCL Investigators. Design and baseline characteristics of the stroke prevention by aggressive reduction in cholesterol levels (SPARCL) study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;16:389–95.
    1. Benavente OR, White CL, Pearce L, et al. . The secondary prevention of small subcortical strokes (SPS3) study. Int J Stroke 2011;6:164–75.
    1. Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. . Management of atherothrombosis with clopidogrel in high-risk patients with recent transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke (MATCH): study design and baseline data. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:253–61.
    1. Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Trial Investigators. Design, progress, and challenges of a double-blind trial of warfarin versus aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Neuroepidemiology 2003;22:106–17.
    1. Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Furie KL, et al. . Pioglitazone after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1321–31.
    1. Viscoli CM, Brass LM, Carolei A, et al. . Pioglitazone for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: rationale and design of the Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke trial. Am Heart J 2014;168:823–9.e6.
    1. Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RLJ, et al. . Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia. JAMA 2011;306:1983–92.
    1. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A III, et al., Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Investigators. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2006;355:549–59.
    1. Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, et al. , Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial Investigators. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomized trial. Lancet 2014;383:333–41.
    1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, et al. . Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305–16.
    1. Chaturvedi S, Turan TN, Lynn MJ, et al. . Risk factor status and vascular events in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Neurology 2007;69:2063–8.
    1. Benavente OR, Hart RG, McClure LA, et al. , SPS3 Investigators. Effects of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with a recent lacunar stroke. N Engl J Med 2012;367:817–25.
    1. Lau H, White CL, Coffey C, et al. . Clinical trial participation and health behavior modification: Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3). J Neurol Disord Stroke 2015;3:1094.
    1. Toole JF, Malinow MR, Chambless LE, et al. . Lowering homocysteine in patients with ischemic stroke to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. The Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2004;291:565–75.
    1. Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, et al. . AHA Guidelines. Revision 2000: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Stroke 2000;31:2751–66.
    1. Saposnik G, Goodman SG, Leiter LA, et al. . Applying the evidence. Do patients with stroke, coronary artery disease, or both achieve similar treatment goals? Stroke 2009;40:1417–24.
    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. . Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2014 update. A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013;129:e28–e292.
    1. Muntner P, Levitan EB, Brown TM, et al. . Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of high low density lipoprotein-cholesterol among United States adults from 1999-2000 through 2009-2010. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:664–70.
    1. Kaplan RC, Tirschwell DL, Longstreth WT, et al. . Vascular events, mortality, and preventive therapy following ischemic stroke in the elderly. Neurology 2005;65:835–42.
    1. Glader EL, Sjölander M, Eriksson M, et al. . Persistent use of secondary prevention drugs declines rapidly during the first 2 years after stroke. Stroke 2010;41:397–401.
    1. Bak S, Sindrup SH, Alslev T, et al. . Cessation of smoking after first-ever stroke: a follow-up study. Stroke 2002;33:2263–9.
    1. Mouradian MS, Majumdar SR, Senthilselvan A, et al. . How well are hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking managed after a stroke or transient ischemic attack? Stroke 2002;33:1656–9.
    1. Gamboa CM, Safford MM, Levitan EB, et al. . Statin underuse and low prevalence of LDL-C control among US adults at high risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Med Sci 2014;348:108–14.
    1. Cannon CP, Rhee KE, Califf RM, et al. , REACH Registry Investigators. Current use of aspirin and antithrombotic agents in the United States among outpatients with atherothrombotic disease (from the REduction of Atherosclerosis for Continued Health [REACH] Registry). Am J Cardiol 2010;105:445–52.
    1. Gordon NF, Gulanick M, Costa F, et al. . Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors. An American Heart Association statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Circulation 2004;109:2031–41.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera