Effect of suture technique on the occurrence of incisional hernia after elective midline abdominal wall closure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

René H Fortelny, Petra Baumann, Wolfgang E Thasler, Markus Albertsmeier, Stefan Riedl, Wolfgang Steurer, Jan Ludolf Kewer, Andreas Shamiyeh, René H Fortelny, Petra Baumann, Wolfgang E Thasler, Markus Albertsmeier, Stefan Riedl, Wolfgang Steurer, Jan Ludolf Kewer, Andreas Shamiyeh

Abstract

Background: Based on a recent meta-analysis, a continuous suture technique with a suture to wound length ratio of at least 4:1, using a slowly absorbable monofilament suture material, is recommended for primary median laparotomy closure. Incisional hernia, which develops in 9 to 20% of patients, remains the major complication of abdominal wall closure. Current clinical data indicate that the incidence of incisional hernias increases by 60% between the first and the third year after median laparotomy, implicating that a follow-up period of 1 year postoperatively is too short with regard to this common complication. Trauma to the abdominal wall can be reduced by improvements in suture technique as well as suture material. Several factors, such as stitch length, suture tension, elasticity, and tensile strength of the suture material are discussed and currently under investigation. A Swedish randomized controlled trial showed a significant reduction in the incisional hernia rate by shortening the stitch length. However, a non-elastic thread was used and follow-up ended after 12 months. Therefore, we designed a multicenter, international, double-blinded, randomized trial to analyze the influence of stitch length, using an elastic, extra-long term absorbable monofilament suture, on the long term clinical outcome of abdominal wall closure.

Methods: In total, 468 patients undergoing an elective, median laparotomy will be randomly allocated to either the short stitch or the long stitch suture technique for abdominal wall closure in a 1:1 ratio. Centers located in Germany and Austria will participate. The primary endpoint measure is the incisional hernia rate 1 year postoperatively, as verified by ultrasound. The frequency of short term and long term complications as well as costs, length of hospital stay and patients' quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L) will be considered as secondary parameters. Following hospital discharge, patients will be examined after 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery.

Discussion: This study will provide further evidence on whether a short stitch suture technique in combination with an elastic, extra-long term absorbable monofilament suture can prevent incisional hernias in the long term, compared with the long stitch suture technique.

Trial registration: NCT01965249 .

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SPIRIT diagram. SPIRIT, Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials.

References

    1. van ’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002; 89:1350–6.
    1. Friedman DW, Boyd CD, Norton P, Greco RS, Boyarsky AH, Mackenzie JW, et al. Increases in type III collagen expression and protein synthesis in patients with inguinal hernias. Ann Surg. 1993;218:754–60. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199312000-00009.
    1. Usher FC. Technique for repairing inguinal hernias with Marlex mesh. Am J Surg. 1982;143:382–4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90113-1.
    1. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Overweight and healing of midline incisions: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:175–80.
    1. Israelsson LA, Jonsson I. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg. 1993;80:1284–6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801020.
    1. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye I. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:436–42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200003000-00018.
    1. Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 1998;176:666–70. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00277-3.
    1. Rucinski J, Margolis M, Panagopoulos G, Wise L. Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique. Am Surg. 2001;67:421–6.
    1. Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;251:843–56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4.
    1. Hollinsky C, Sandberg S. Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue. Clin Biomec Avon. 2007;22:88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.06.002.
    1. Höer J, Töns C, Schachtrupp A, Anurov M, Titkova S, Oettinger A, et al. Quantitative evaluation of abdominal wall perfusion after different types of laparotomy closure using laser-fluorescence videography. Hernia. 2002;6(1):11–16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0047-3.
    1. Höer J, Fischer L, Schachtrupp A. Laparotomy closure and incisional hernia prevention - what are the surgical requirements? Zentralbl Chir. 2011;136(1):42–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262682.
    1. Albertsmeier M, Seiler CM, Fischer L, Baumann P, Hüsing J, Seidlmayer C, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMax® suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy-a controlled prospective multicenter trial: ISSAAC [NCI005725079] Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397:363–71. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0884-6.
    1. Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009;144:1056–9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.189.
    1. Cengiz V, Blomquist P, Israelsson LA. Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study. Arch Surg. 2001;136:272–5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.3.272.
    1. Harlaar JJ, Deerenberg EB, van Ramshorst GH, Lont HE, van der Borst EC, Schouten WR, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions. BMC Surg. 2011;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-20.
    1. Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN, Knebel P, Bruckner T, Ulrich A, et al. Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:51–4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9364.
    1. Seiler CM, Bruckner I, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, et al. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCIN2402354) Ann Surg. 2009;24:576–82. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera