Concomitant arginine-vasopressin and hydrocortisone therapy in severe septic shock: association with mortality

Christian Torgersen, Günter Luckner, Daniel C H Schröder, Christian A Schmittinger, Christopher Rex, Hanno Ulmer, Martin W Dünser, Christian Torgersen, Günter Luckner, Daniel C H Schröder, Christian A Schmittinger, Christopher Rex, Hanno Ulmer, Martin W Dünser

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the association between concomitant arginine-vasopressin (AVP)/hydrocortisone therapy and mortality in severe septic shock patients.

Methods: This retrospective study included severe septic shock patients treated with supplementary AVP. To test the association between concomitant AVP/hydrocortisone use and mortality, a multivariate regression and Cox model (adjusted for admission year, initial AVP dosage and the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score before AVP) as well as a propensity score-based analysis were used. In both models, intensive care unit (ICU) and 28-day mortality served as outcome variables.

Results: One hundred fifty-nine patients were included. Hydrocortisone was administered to 76 (47.8%) at a median daily dosage of 300 (200-300) mg. In the multivariate logistic regression model, concomitant use of AVP and hydrocortisone was associated with a trend towards lower ICU (OR, 0.51; CI 95%, 0.24-1.08; p = 0.08) and 28-day (HR, 0.69; CI 95%, 0.43-1.08; p = 0.11) mortality. The probability of survival at day 28, as predicted by the regression model, was significantly higher in patients treated with concomitant AVP and hydrocortisone compared to those receiving AVP without hydrocortisone (p = 0.001). In a propensity score-based analysis, ICU (45 vs. 65%; OR, 0.69; CI 95% 0.38-1.26; p = 0.23) and 28-day mortality (35.5 vs. 55%; OR, 0.59; CI 95%, 0.27-1.29; p = 0.18) was not different between patients treated with (n = 40) or without concomitant hydrocortisone (n = 40).

Conclusion: Concomitant AVP and hydrocortisone therapy may be associated with a survival benefit in septic shock. An adequately powered, randomised controlled trial appears warranted to confirm these preliminary, hypothesis-generating results.

References

    1. Nature. 1982 Sep 23;299(5881):355-7
    1. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):111-24
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Apr;30(4):536-55
    1. Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2659-66
    1. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):811-8
    1. JAMA. 2002 Aug 21;288(7):862-71
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jan;36(1):83-91
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):17-60
    1. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):864-74
    1. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87
    1. J Crit Care. 2008 Dec;23(4):500-6
    1. Shock. 2007 Mar;27(3):281-8
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jan;36(1):57-65
    1. Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):2280-5
    1. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006 Dec;155(6):845-8
    1. Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10
    1. Regul Pept. 2008 Apr 10;147(1-3):67-71
    1. JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63
    1. Circulation. 2003 May 13;107(18):2313-9
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Dec;36(12):1993-2003

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera