Seroma formation after surgery for breast cancer

Esmat Hashemi, Ahmad Kaviani, Masoume Najafi, Mandana Ebrahimi, Homeira Hooshmand, Ali Montazeri, Esmat Hashemi, Ahmad Kaviani, Masoume Najafi, Mandana Ebrahimi, Homeira Hooshmand, Ali Montazeri

Abstract

Background: Seroma formation is the most frequent postoperative complication after breast cancer surgery. We carried out a study to investigate the effect of various demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables on seroma formation.

Patients and methods: A retrospective cross sectional study of patients who underwent surgical therapy for breast cancer with either modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or breast preservation (BP) was carried out. The demographic data and clinical information were extracted from case records. Seroma formation was studied in relation to age, type of surgery, tumor size, nodal involvement, preoperative chemotherapy, surgical instrument (electrocautery or scalpel), use of pressure garment, and duration of drainage. The multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios.

Results: A total of 158 patients with breast cancer were studied. The mean age of the patients was 46.3 years (SD +/- 11.9). Seventy-three percent underwent modified radical mastectomy and the remaining 27% received breast preservation surgery. Seroma occurred in 35% of patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis an association of postoperative seroma formation was noted with modified radical mastectomy (OR = 2.83, 95% CI 1.01-7.90, P = 0.04). No other factor studied was found to significantly effect the seroma formation after breast cancer surgery.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the type of surgery is a predicting factor for seroma formation in breast cancer patients.

References

    1. Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne C. Diseases of the breast. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2000.
    1. Pogson CJ, Adwani A, Ebbs SR. Seroma following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:711–717. doi: 10.1016/S0748-7983(03)00096-9.
    1. Barwell J, Campbell L, Watkins RM, Teasdale C. How long should suction drains stay in after breast surgery with axillary dissection? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79:435–437.
    1. Woodworth PA, McBoyle MF, Helmer SD, Beamer RL. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: incidence and predicting factors. Am Surg. 2000;66:444–450.
    1. Brayant M, Baum M. Postoperative seroma following mastectomy and axillary dissection. Br J Surg. 1987;74:1187.
    1. Budd DC, Cochran RC, Sturtz DL, Fouty WJ. Surgical morbidity after mastectomy operations. Am J Surg. 1978;135:218–220. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90103-4.
    1. Aitkin DR, Minton JP. Complications associated with mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1983;63:1331–1352.
    1. Dawson I, Stam L, Heslinga JM, Kalsbeck HL. Effect of shoulder immobilization on wound seroma and shoulder dysfunction following modified radical mastectomy: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Br J Surg. 1989;76:311–312.
    1. Petrek JA, Peters MM, Nori S, Knaner C, Kinne DW, Rogatco A. Axillary lymphadenectomy: a prospective, randomized trial of thirteen factors influencing drainage, including early or delayed arm mobilization. Arch Surg. 1990;125:378–382.
    1. Gonzalez EA, Saltzstein EC, Riedner CS, Nelson BK. Seroma formation following breast cancer surgery. Breast J. 2003;9:385–388. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09504.x.
    1. Porter KA, O'Connor S, Rimm E, Lopez M. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg. 1998;176:8–11. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00093-2.
    1. O' Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA. External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg . 1999;177:450–453. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00089-6.
    1. Lumachi F, Burelli P, Basso SM, Iacobone M, Ermani M. Usefulness of ultrasound scissors in reducing serous drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer: a prospective randomized clinical study. Am Surg. 2004;70:80–84.
    1. Schuijtvlot M, Sahu AK, Cawthorn SJ. A prospective audit of the use of a buttress suture to reduce seroma formation following axillary node dissection without drains. Breast. 2002;11:94–96. doi: 10.1054/brst.2001.0366.
    1. Gilly FN, Francois Y, Sayag-Beaujard AC, Glehen O, Brachet A, Vignal J. Prevention of lymphorrhea by means of fibrin glue after axillary lymphadenectomy in breast cancer: prospective randomized trial. Eur Surg Res. 1998;30:439–443. doi: 10.1159/000008611.
    1. Jain PK, Sowdi R, Anderson AD, MacFie J. Randomized clinical trial investigating the use of drains and fibrin sealent following surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:54–60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4435.
    1. Burak WE, Goodman PS, Young DC, Farrar WB. Seroma formation following axillary dissection for breast cancer: risk factors and lack of influence of bovine thrombin. J Surg Oncol. 1997;64:27–31.
    1. McCaul JA, Aslaam A, Spooner RJ, Louden I, Cavanagh T, Purushotham AD. Aetiology of seroma formation in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Breast. 2000;9:144–148. doi: 10.1054/brst.1999.0126.
    1. Lumachi F, Brandes AA, Burelli P, Basso SM, Iacobone M, Ermani M. Seroma prevention following axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer by using ultrasound scissors: a prospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:526–530. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.03.003.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera