Dose-limiting toxicity after hypofractionated dose-escalated radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

Donald M Cannon, Minesh P Mehta, Jarrod B Adkison, Deepak Khuntia, Anne M Traynor, Wolfgang A Tomé, Richard J Chappell, Ranjini Tolakanahalli, Pranshu Mohindra, Søren M Bentzen, George M Cannon, Donald M Cannon, Minesh P Mehta, Jarrod B Adkison, Deepak Khuntia, Anne M Traynor, Wolfgang A Tomé, Richard J Chappell, Ranjini Tolakanahalli, Pranshu Mohindra, Søren M Bentzen, George M Cannon

Abstract

Purpose: Local failure rates after radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain high. Consequently, RT dose intensification strategies continue to be explored, including hypofractionation, which allows for RT acceleration that could potentially improve outcomes. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) with dose-escalated hypofractionation has not been adequately defined.

Patients and methods: Seventy-nine patients with NSCLC were enrolled on a prospective single-institution phase I trial of dose-escalated hypofractionated RT without concurrent chemotherapy. Escalation of dose per fraction was performed according to patients' stratified risk for radiation pneumonitis with total RT doses ranging from 57 to 85.5 Gy in 25 daily fractions over 5 weeks using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The MTD was defined as the maximum dose with ≤ 20% risk of severe toxicity.

Results: No grade 3 pneumonitis was observed and an MTD for acute toxicity was not identified during patient accrual. However, with a longer follow-up period, grade 4 to 5 toxicity occurred in six patients and was correlated with total dose (P = .004). An MTD was identified at 63.25 Gy in 25 fractions. Late grade 4 to 5 toxicities were attributable to damage to central and perihilar structures and correlated with dose to the proximal bronchial tree.

Conclusion: Although this dose-escalation model limited the rates of clinically significant pneumonitis, dose-limiting toxicity occurred and was dominated by late radiation toxicity involving central and perihilar structures. The identified dose-response for damage to the proximal bronchial tree warrants caution in future dose-intensification protocols, especially when using hypofractionation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00214123.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Cumulative incidence of local failure according to total dose delivered (P = .81), with death as a competing risk.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
(A) Incidence (1 − Kaplan-Meier [KM] estimate) of any grade 4 or 5 toxicity in patients censored at the time of death or last clinical follow-up. Dashed lines represent the 95% CI. (B) Two-year probabilities of late grade 4 or 5 toxicity according to dose-per-fraction normalized dose (EQD2) to the proximal bronchial tree and estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Open circles represent the 1 − KM estimate (± 95% CI) for quartiles of EQD2 D3cc (centered at the quartile mean). DXcc, maximum dose D such that X cm3 of the structure received a dose ≥ D; Dmax, maximum dose to any voxel within structure.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera