Validation of the Recent Life Changes Questionnaire (RLCQ) for stress measurement among adults residing in urban communities in Pakistan

Azmina Artani, Ayeesha K Kamal, Syed Iqbal Azam, Moiz Artani, Shireen Shehzad Bhamani, Mehreen Saif, Fariha Afzal Khan, Nazir Alam, Azmina Artani, Ayeesha K Kamal, Syed Iqbal Azam, Moiz Artani, Shireen Shehzad Bhamani, Mehreen Saif, Fariha Afzal Khan, Nazir Alam

Abstract

Background: Recent Life Changes Questionnaire (RLCQ) developed by Richard Rahe has enabled quantification of stress by analyzing life events. The overall aim of the study was to create a reliable version of the Rahe's RLCQ for measuring stress in individuals living in developing countries and assess its validity. This paper discusses criterion validation of the adapted RLCQ in urban communities in Pakistan.

Methods: This is a criterion validation study. Four urban communities of Karachi, Pakistan were selected for the study in which households were randomly chosen. Two data collectors were assigned to administer the adapted RLCQ to eligible participants after obtaining written informed consent. Following this interaction, two psychologists interviewed the same participants with a diagnostic gold standard of Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) which is utilized in usual practice within Pakistan to confirm the presence of stress related mental disorders such as Depression, Anxiety, Dysthymia, Suicide, Phobia, OCD, Panic Disorder, PTSD, Drug abuse and dependence, Alcohol abuse and dependence, Eating Disorders and Antisocial Personality Disorder to validate the accuracy of the adapted RLCQ. We generated the ROC curves for the adapted RLCQ with suggested cut-offs, and analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of the adapted RLCQ.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety was 0.64, where sensitivity was 66%, specificity was 56% and the corresponding cut off from the adapted RLCQ was 750. Individuals scoring ≥750 were classified as high stress and vice versa. In contrast, the area under the ROC curve for serious mental disorder and adverse outcomes such as suicide, bipolar and dysthymia was 0.75, where sensitivity was 72% and specificity was 60% at the cut off of 800 on the adapted RLCQ. Individuals scoring ≥800 were classified as high stress and vice versa. The rate of agreement between the two psychologists was 94.32% (Kappa = 0.84).

Conclusion: The adapted and validated RLCQ characterizes common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety with moderate accuracy and severe mental disorders such as suicide, bipolar and dysthymia with high accuracy.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02356263 . Registered January 28, 2015. (Observational Study Only).

Keywords: Developing countries; Mental disorders; RLCQ; Stress; Validation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Fogarty International Center, National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke or the National Institute of Health.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow Diagram of Validation Phase
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curve of Common Mental Disorders (Bipolar, Dysthymia, Suicide, Depression and GAD)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curve of Serious Mental Disorder and Adverse Outcomes (Bipolar, Suicide and Dysthymia)

References

    1. Nevid J. Essentials of psychology: concepts and applications: Cengage learning. 2011.
    1. Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Miller GE. Psychological stress and disease. JAMA. 2007;298(14):1685–1687. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.14.1685.
    1. Low NC, Dugas E, O’Loughlin E, Rodriguez D, Contreras G, Chaiton M, et al. Common stressful life events and difficulties are associated with mental health symptoms and substance use in young adolescents. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):116. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-116.
    1. Marin M-F, Lord C, Andrews J, Juster R-P, Sindi S, Arsenault-Lapierre G, et al. Chronic stress, cognitive functioning and mental health. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011;96(4):583–595. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.02.016.
    1. Pompili M, Innamorati M, Szanto K, Di Vittorio C, Conwell Y, Lester D, et al. Life events as precipitants of suicide attempts among first-time suicide attempters, repeaters, and non-attempters. Psychiatry Res. 2011;186(2–3):300–305. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.003.
    1. Sharpley CF. Neurobiological pathways between chronic stress and depression: dysregulated adaptive mechanisms. Clin Med Psychiatry. 2009;2:33–45.
    1. Organization WH. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates: World Health Organization; 2017.
    1. Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C, Chey T, Jackson JW, Patel V, et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(2):476–493. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu038.
    1. Naqvi H, Khan MM. Depression in primary care: difficulties and paradoxes. J Pak Med Assoc. 2005;55(9):393–8.
    1. Kidwai R. Demographic factors, social problems and material amenities as predictors of psychological distress: a cross-sectional study in Karachi, Pakistan. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49(1):27–39. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0692-0.
    1. Miller MA, Rahe RH. Life changes scaling for the 1990s. J Psychosom Res. 1997;43(3):279–292. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00118-9.
    1. Hobson CJ, Kamen J, Szostek J, Nethercut CM, Tiedmann JW, Wojnarowicz S. Stressful life events: a revision and update of the social readjustment rating scale. Int J Stress Manag. 1998;5(1):1–23. doi: 10.1023/A:1022978019315.
    1. Linden W. Development and initial validation of a life event scale for students. Can J Couns Psychother. 1984;18(3):106–10.
    1. Arias I, Rodriguez E, Padilla J, Gonzalez N, Rodriguez MA. Translation to Spanish, reproducibility, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Miller-Rahe recent life change questionnaire in Venezuela. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;12(4):287–293. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)12:4<287::AID-ART7>;2-1.
    1. Ovuga E, Boardman J, Wasserman D. The response inventory for stressful life events (RISLE) II: validation of the 36-item version. Afr Health Sci. 2005;5(2):145–151.
    1. Roohafza H, Ramezani M, Sadeghi M, Shahnam M, Zolfagari B, Sarafzadegan N. Development and validation of the stressful life event questionnaire. Int J Public Health. 2011;56(4):441–448. doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0232-1.
    1. Sali R, Roohafza H, Sadeghi M, Andalib E, Shavandi H, Sarrafzadegan N. Validation of the revised stressful life event questionnaire using a hybrid model of genetic algorithm and artificial neural networks. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:601640. doi: 10.1155/2013/601640.
    1. Morote Rios R, Hjemdal O, Martinez Uribe P, Corveleyn J. Life stress as a determinant of emotional well-being: development and validation of a Spanish-language checklist of stressful life events. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014;2(1):390–411. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2014.897624.
    1. Artani A, Bhamani SS, Azam I, AbdulSultan M, Khoja A, Kamal AK. Adaptation of the recent life changes questionnaire (RLCQ) to measure stressful life events in adults residing in an urban megapolis in Pakistan. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1315-1.
    1. Lecrubier Y, Sheehan D, Weiller E, Amorim P, Bonora I, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry. 1997;12(5):224–231. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8.
    1. Pettersson A, Modin S, Wahlström R, Af Winklerfelt Hammarberg S, Krakau I. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview is useful and well accepted as part of the clinical assessment for depression and anxiety in primary care: a mixed-methods study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0674-5.
    1. Busner J, Kaplan SL, Nicholas Greco I, Sheehan DV. The use of research measures in adult clinical practice. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2011;8(4):19.
    1. Gaynes BN, DeVeaugh-Geiss J, Weir S, Gu H, MacPherson C, Schulberg HC, et al. Feasibility and diagnostic validity of the M-3 checklist: a brief, self-rated screen for depressive, bipolar, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorders in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(2):160–169. doi: 10.1370/afm.1092.
    1. Myer L, Smit J, Roux LL, Parker S, Stein DJ, Seedat S. Common mental disorders among HIV-infected individuals in South Africa: prevalence, predictors, and validation of brief psychiatric rating scales. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2008;22(2):147–158. doi: 10.1089/apc.2007.0102.
    1. Karmaliani R, Bann CM, Pirani F, Akhtar S, Bender RH, Goldenberg RL, et al. Diagnostic validity of two instruments for assessing anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Health Care Women Int. 2007;28(6):556–572. doi: 10.1080/07399330701334562.
    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:22–33.
    1. Cano A, Sprafkin RP, Scaturo DJ, Lantinga LJ, Fiese BH, Brand F. Mental health screening in primary care: a comparison of 3 brief measures of psychological distress. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;3(5):206. doi: 10.4088/PCC.v03n0503.
    1. Braun-Lewensohn O, Sagy S. Community resilience and sense of coherence as protective factors in explaining stress reactions: comparing cities and rural communities during missiles attacks. Community Ment Health J. 2014;50(2):229–234. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9623-5.
    1. Wagnild G. A review of the resilience scale. J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(2):105–113. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.17.2.105.
    1. Bhamani SS, Pasha O, Karmaliani R, Asad N, Azam I. Validation of the Urdu version of Wagnild and Young’s long and short resilience scales among 20-to 40-year-old married women living in urban squatter settlements of Karachi, Pakistan. J Nurs Meas. 2015;23(3):425–435. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.23.3.425.
    1. Saxena S, Thornicroft G, Knapp M, Whiteford H. Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):878–889. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61239-2.
    1. Afridi MI. Mental health: priorities in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58(5):225–226.
    1. Schneider H, Okello D, Lehmann U. The global pendulum swing towards community health workers in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review of trends, geographical distribution and programmatic orientations, 2005 to 2014. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0163-2.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Lassi ZS, Pariyo G, Huicho L. Global experience of community health workers for delivery of health related millennium development goals: a systematic review, country case studies, and recommendations for integration into national health systems. Glob Health Workforce Alliance. 2010;1:249–261.
    1. Armstrong G, Kermode M, Raja S, Suja S, Chandra P, Jorm AF. A mental health training program for community health workers in India: impact on knowledge and attitudes. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2011;5(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-5-17.
    1. Kakuma R, Minas H, van Ginneken N, Dal Poz MR, Desiraju K, Morris JE, et al. Human resources for mental health care: current situation and strategies for action. Lancet. 2011;378(9803):1654–1663. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61093-3.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera