Impact of a community-based perinatal and newborn preventive care package on perinatal and neonatal mortality in a remote mountainous district in Northern Pakistan

Zahid A Memon, Gul N Khan, Sajid B Soofi, Imam Y Baig, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Zahid A Memon, Gul N Khan, Sajid B Soofi, Imam Y Baig, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence from community-based interventions to guide the development of effective maternal, perinatal and newborn care practices and services in developing countries. We evaluated the impact of a low-cost package of community-based interventions implemented through government sector lady health workers (LHWs) and community health workers (CHWs) of a NGO namely Aga Khan Health Services on perinatal and neonatal outcomes in a sub-population of the remote mountainous district of Gilgit, Northern Pakistan.

Methods: The package was evaluated using quasi experimental design included promotion of antenatal care, adequate nutrition, skilled delivery and healthy newborn care practices. Control areas continued to receive the routine standard health services. The intervention areas received intervention package in addition to the routine standard health services. Outcome measures included changes in maternal and newborn-care practices and perinatal and neonatal mortality rates between the intervention and control areas.

Results: The intervention was implemented in a population of 283324 over a 18 months period. 3200 pregnant women received the intervention. Significant improvements in antenatal care (92% vs 76%, p < .001), TT vaccination (67% vs 47%, p < .001), institutional delivery (85% vs 71%, p < .001), cord application (51% vs 71%, p < .001), delayed bathing (15% vs 43%, p < .001), colostrum administration (83% vs 64%, p < .001), and initiation of breastfeeding within 1 hour after birth (55% vs 40%, p < .001) were seen in intervention areas compared with control areas. Our results indicate significant reductions in mortality rates in intervention areas as compared to control areas from baseline in perinatal mortality rate (from 47.1 to 35.3 per 1000 births, OR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.56-0.69; P 0.02) and neonatal mortality rates (from 26.0 to 22.8 per 1000 live births, 0.58; 95% CI: 0.48-0.68; P 0.03).

Conclusions: The implementation of a set of low cost community-based intervention package within the health system settings in a mountainous region of Pakistan was found to be both feasible and beneficial. The interventions had a significant impact in reduction of the burden of perinatal and neonatal mortality.

Trial registration: This study is registered, ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02412293 .

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study phases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study district with intervention and control areas.

References

    1. UNICEF . Committing to child survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report. New York: UNICEF; 2013.
    1. WHO . iERG. Every woman every child: Strengthening equity and dignity through health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013.
    1. National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS) [Pakistan] and ICF International . Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2012–13. Islamabad, Pakistan, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: NIPS and ICF International; 2013.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Hafeez A, Rizvi A, Ali N, Khan A, Ahmad F, et al. Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in Pakistan: challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2013;381(9884):2207–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61999-0.
    1. Haws RA, Thomas AL, Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL. Impact of packaged interventions on neonatal health: a review of the evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2007;22(4):193–215. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm009.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Soofi S, Cousens S, Mohammad S, Memon ZA, Ali I, et al. Improvement of perinatal and newborn care in rural Pakistan through community-based strategies: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9763):403–12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62274-X.
    1. Baqui AH, El-Arifeen S, Darmstadt GL, Ahmed S, E K. Seraji HR, et al. Effect of community-based newborn-care intervention package implemented through two service-delivery strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9628):1936–44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60835-1.
    1. Kumar V, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Misra RP, Santosham M, Awasthi S, et al. Effect of community-based behaviour change management on neonatal mortality in Shivgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9644):1151–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61483-X.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Memon ZA, Soofi S, Salat MS, Cousens S, Martines J. Implementing community-based perinatal care: results from a pilot study in rural Pakistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(6):452–9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.045849.
    1. Kirkwood BR, Manu A, Asbroek AH, Soremekun S, Weobong B, Gyan T, et al. Effect of the Newhints home-visits intervention on neonatal mortality rate and care practices in Ghana: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9884):2184–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60095-1.
    1. Kirkwood B, Bahl R. Can women’s groups reduce maternal and newborn deaths? Lancet. 2013;381(9879):e12–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60985-X.
    1. Tripathy P, Nair N, Barnett S, Mahapatra R, Borghi J, Rath S, et al. Effect of a participatory intervention with women’s groups on birth outcomes and maternal depression in Jharkhand and Orissa, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9721):1182–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62042-0.
    1. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet. 2005;365(9463):977–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71088-6.
    1. Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A, Copas A, et al. Women’s group practicing participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1736–46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6.
    1. Lassi ZS, Haider BA, Bhutta ZA. Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD007754.
    1. Population Census Organization: Pakistan census report 1998. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan; 1998.
    1. Anker M, Black RE, Coldham C, Kalter HD, Quigley MA, Ross D, et al. A standard verbal autopsy method for investigating causes of death in infants and children. World Health Organization, Johns Hopkins University, London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Oxford University and Kenya Medical Research Institute. Geneva: WHO/CDS/CSR/ISR/99.4; 1999.
    1. Aggarwal AK, Kumar P, Pandit S, Kumar R. Accuracy of WHO verbal autopsy tool in determining major causes of neonatal deaths in India. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054865.
    1. Bhutta Z, Darmstadt G, Ransom E. Using evidence to save newborn lives. Policy brief. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau; 2003.
    1. Bhutta Z. Effective interventions to reduce neonatal mortality and morbidity from perinatal infection. In: Costello A, Manandhar D, editors. Improving newborn infant health in developing countries. London: Imperial College Press; 2000. pp. 289–308.
    1. Agrawal PK, Agrawal S, Ahmed S, Darmstadt GL, Williams EK, Rosen HE, et al. Effect of knowledge of community health workers on essential newborn health care: a study from rural India. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(2):115–26. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr018.
    1. Talukder M. The importance of breastfeeding and strategies to sustain high breastfeeding rates. In: Costello A, Manandhar D, editors. Improving newborn infant health in developing countries. Singapore: World Scientific Publications; 2000. pp. 309–42.
    1. Huffman S, Zehner E, Victora C. Can improvements in breastfeeding practices reduce neonatal mortality in developing countries? Midwifery. 2001;17(2):80–92. doi: 10.1054/midw.2001.0253.
    1. Engle P. Infant feeding styles: barriers and opportunities for good nutrition in India. Nutr Rev. 2002;60(5):S109–14. doi: 10.1301/00296640260130849.
    1. Haider R, Ashworth A, Kabir I, Huttly S. Effect of community-based peer counselors on exclusive breastfeeding practices in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9242):1643–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03159-7.
    1. Oxford Policy Management. Lady Health Worker Programme, External evaluation of the national programme for family planning and primary health care, Islamabad, Pakistan. 2009.
    1. Douthwaite M, Ward P. Increasing contraceptive use in rural Pakistan: an evaluation of the Lady Health Worker Programme. Health Policy Plan. 2005;20(2):117–23. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi014.
    1. Mumtaz Z, Salway S, Waseem M, Umer N. Gender-based barriers to primary health care provision in Pakistan: the experience of female providers. Health Policy Plan. 2003;18(3):261–9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czg032.
    1. Afsar HA, Younus M. Recommendations to strengthen the role of lady health workers in the national program for family planning and primary health care in Pakistan: the health worker’s perspective. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2005;17(1):48–53.
    1. Bang AT, Reddy HM, Deshmukh MD, Baitule SB, Bang RA. Neonatal and infant mortality in the ten years (1993 to 2003) of the Gadchiroli field trial: effect of home-based neonatal care. J Perinatol. 2005;25(Suppl 1):S92–107. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211277.
    1. Bang AT, Bang RA, Reddy HM, Deshmukh M, Baitule SB. Reduced incidence of neonatal morbidities: effect of home-based neonatal care in rural Gadchiroli, India. J Perinatol. 2005;25(Suppl 1):S51–61. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211274.
    1. Baqui AH, Williams EK, Darmstadt GL, Kumar V, Kiran TU, Panwar D, et al. Newborn care in rural Uttar Pradesh. Indian J of Pediatr. 2007;74(3):241–7. doi: 10.1007/s12098-007-0038-6.
    1. Haines A, Sanders D, Lehmann U, Rowe AK, Lawn JE, Jan S, et al. Achieving child survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers. Lancet. 2007;369(9579):2121–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60325-0.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera