HIV-1 drug resistance in the iPrEx preexposure prophylaxis trial

Teri Liegler, Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen, L Gordon Bentley, Robert Atchison, Timothy Schmidt, Jacqueline Javier, Megha Mehrotra, Christopher Eden, David V Glidden, Vanessa McMahan, Peter L Anderson, Peilin Li, Joseph K Wong, Susan Buchbinder, Juan V Guanira, Robert M Grant, iPrEx Study Team, Teri Liegler, Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen, L Gordon Bentley, Robert Atchison, Timothy Schmidt, Jacqueline Javier, Megha Mehrotra, Christopher Eden, David V Glidden, Vanessa McMahan, Peter L Anderson, Peilin Li, Joseph K Wong, Susan Buchbinder, Juan V Guanira, Robert M Grant, iPrEx Study Team

Abstract

Background: The iPrEx study demonstrated that combination oral emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) as preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) protects against HIV acquisition in men who have sex with men and transgender women. Selection for drug resistance could offset PrEP benefits.

Methods: Phenotypic and genotypic clinical resistance assays characterized major drug resistant mutations. Minor variants with FTC/TDF mutations K65R, K70E, M184V/I were measured using 454 deep sequencing and a novel allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) diagnostic tolerant to sequence heterogeneity.

Results: Control of primer-binding site heterogeneity resulted in improved accuracy of minor variant measurements by AS-PCR. Of the 48 on-study infections randomized to FTC/TDF, none showed FTC/TDF mutations by clinical assays despite detectable drug levels in 8 participants. Two randomized to FTC/TDF had minor variant M184I detected at 0.53% by AS-PCR or 0.75% by deep sequencing, only 1 of which had low but detectable drug levels. Among those with acute infection at randomization to FTC/TDF, M184V or I mutations that were predominant at seroconversion waned to background levels within 24 weeks after discontinuing drug.

Conclusions: Drug resistance was rare in iPrEx on-study FTC/TDF-randomized seroconverters, and only as low-frequency minor variants. FTC resistance among those initiating PrEP with acute infection waned rapidly after drug discontinuation. Clinical Trials Registration.NCT00458393.

Keywords: 454 deep sequencing; AS-PCR; FTC/TDF; HIV-1; PrEP; drug resistance; minor variant; preexposure prophylaxis.

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Genotype, phenotype, and minor variant drug resistance in iPrEx seroconverters by randomization arm. Genotype and phenotype results from a subset of iPrEx participants were described previously in the interim analysis report [3] and are included here for a cumulative assessment. Of the 131 participants with incident infection (48 FTC/TDF, 83 placebo), drug resistance assays were performed on specimens collected at first evidence of seroconversion (n = 128) or if unavailable, the HIV RNA-positive visit prior to (n = 2) or following (n = 1) seroconversion. Minor variant drug resistance testing by qMVA was performed on all participants at 1 or more drug resistance mutations. The number of mutation sites ineligible for testing based on preestablished criteria regarding cure primer 3′ end match with viral target sequence among the 131 samples possible are as follows: K65R: n = 2 (1.5%); K70E: n = 11 (8.4%); M184V: n = 5 (3.8%); and M184I: n = 4 (3.0%). Plasma virus from 1 participant was not available for analysis by 454 sequencing (FTC/TDF arm). Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; BCO, biological cut-off; FC IC50, fold change half maximal inhibitory concentration; FTC, emtricitabine; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MAX, maximal FC IC50; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; qMVA, quantitative minor variant assay; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; ZDV, zidovudine.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Schematic of the qMVA for low-level drug resistance. A, FTC/TDF selected mutations measured by the qMVA. DNA amplicons spanning TDF-associated mutations K65R, K70E, and FTC-associated mutations M184V/I are generated by nested RT-PCR from plasma HIV-1 virions, representing the predominant and minor quasispecies. The example shows a hypothetical viral mixture at rt 65 with 99% WT (consensus B codon AAA, Lys) and 1.0% Mut (consensus B codon AGA, Arg) where the mutant sequence is undetectable by population sequencing. B, Cure PCR step. The cure PCR step is performed prior to the AS-PCR step to normalize possible sequence heterogeneity in the AS-PCR primer target sites that can reduce PCR efficiency and result in inaccurate quantification of the minor variant population. The example portrays a virus that differs from the discriminatory AS-PCR primer at 2 sites upstream from the SNP conferring resistance. A low-stringency PCR with limited cycle number is performed on the mixed WT (99%) and Mut (1%) DNA amplicons, using a consensus sequence-based primer pair covering the AS-PCR target sites adjacent to but not including the SNP conferring resistance. When paired with another consensus primer, AS-PCR target amplicons are generated representing the original WT:Mut SNP mixtures, but with AS-PCR target sequences normalized to HIV-1 consensus sequences. C, AS-PCR reaction. Amplicons generated by the cure PCR are diluted appropriately and duplicate PCR reactions are performed with primers specific for the WT or Mut SNP. The discriminatory capability of the AS-PCR primers is enhanced by incorporating a 3′, -2 base mismatch into the AS-PCR primer [36]. D, Determining percent mutant by ΔCt. The percent minor variant in a mixture of WT:Mut amplicons is determined by ΔCt measurements from real-time PCR using WT- and Mut-specific discriminatory primers. When extrapolated by linear regression against a 6-point standard curve run simultaneously (0.1% to 24.3% Mut input in WT background), the percent minor variant (65R) can be derived. Abbreviations: AS-PCR, allele-specific polymerase chain reaction; FTC, emtricitabine; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; Mut, mutant; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; qMVA, quantitative minor variant assay; RT-PCR, reverse-transcriptase PCR; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; WT, wild-type.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Longitudinal measurements of FTC-associated drug resistance over time. HIV-1 Log10 viral load vs the relative proportion of FTC-associated drug resistance mutations M184V (A) and M184I (B) measured by the qMVA (blue, solid lines) and 454 deep sequencing (black, dashed lines) are shown for each of 2 iPrEx participants with unrecognized infection at baseline, and randomized to FTC/TDF. The dashed green line represents the lowest measured BCO value between the qMVA and 454 sequencing assays (0.5%), above which values are considered positive. Shaded areas represent the potential FTC/TDF exposure window from the entry/randomization visit to first evidence of seroconversion, when study drug was terminated. Abbreviations: BCO, biological cut-off; Cps, copies; FTC, emtricitabine; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; qMVA, quantitative minor variant assay; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Plasma and PBMC drug levels present in the estimated infection window in iPrEx seroconverters. The blood plasma FTC, TFV (A) and cellular FTC-TP, TFV-DP (B) levels are shown for all 8 of the 48 iPrEx participants randomized to the FTC/TDF arm, with incident infection showing any detectable drug at study visits within 90 days prior to SC, or at first evidence of SC. Individuals are differentiated by color. Seven participants had measurable drug either before (triangles), or at the SC visit (circles), but not at both. One participant (orange symbol) had detectable drug at multiple time points. The open symbol represents the single participant with minor variant drug resistance at the SC visit (M184I by qMVA, 0.53%). To the right of (B), the estimated dosing frequency corresponding to TFV-TP concentration is shown (median, IQR) as reported from the STRAND trial [8]. BLQ values for TFV, FTC = 10 ng/mL; TFV-DP = 2.5 fmol/106 PBMCs; FTC-TP = 0.1 pmol/106 PBMCs. Abbreviations: BLQ, below the limit of quantitation; FTC, emtricitabine; FTC-TP, FTC triphosphate FTC; IQR, interquartile range; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; SC, seroconversion; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TFV, tenofovir; TFV-DP, TFV diphospate.

References

    1. Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science. 2010;329:1168–74.
    1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:399–410.
    1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–99.
    1. Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:423–34.
    1. Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:2083–90.
    1. Baeten J, Celum C. Systemic and topical drugs for the prevention of HIV infection: antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:219–32.
    1. Celum C, Baeten JM. Tenofovir-based pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: evolving evidence. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:51–7.
    1. Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, et al. Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:151ra25.
    1. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:411–22.
    1. Arts EJ, Hazuda DJ. HIV-1 Antiretroviral Drug Therapy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a007161.
    1. Kuritzkes DR. Clinical significance of drug resistance in HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 1996;10(suppl 5):S27–31.
    1. Tang MW, Shafer RW. HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance: scientific principles and clinical applications. Drugs. 2012;72:e1–25.
    1. Hurt CB, Eron JJ, Jr., Cohen MS. Pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral resistance: HIV prevention at a cost? Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:1265–70.
    1. van de Vijver DA, Boucher CA. The risk of HIV drug resistance following implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23:621–7.
    1. Garcia-Lerma JG, Otten RA, Qari SH, et al. Prevention of rectal SHIV transmission in macaques by daily or intermittent prophylaxis with emtricitabine and tenofovir. PLOS Med. 2008;5:e28.
    1. Roland ME, Neilands TB, Krone MR, et al. Seroconversion following nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis against HIV. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1507–13.
    1. Schechter M, do Lago RF, Mendelsohn AB, et al. Behavioral impact, acceptability, and HIV incidence among homosexual men with access to postexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:519–25.
    1. Eshleman SH, Hoover DR, Chen S, et al. Resistance after single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis emerges in a high proportion of Malawian newborns. AIDS. 2005;19:2167–9.
    1. Eshleman SH, Mracna M, Guay LA, et al. Selection and fading of resistance mutations in women and infants receiving nevirapine to prevent HIV-1 vertical transmission (HIVNET 012) AIDS. 2001;15:1951–7.
    1. Martinson NA, Morris L, Gray G, et al. Selection and persistence of viral resistance in HIV-infected children after exposure to single-dose nevirapine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44:148–53.
    1. Micek MA, Blanco AJ, Beck IA, et al. Nevirapine resistance by timing of HIV type 1 infection in infants treated with single-dose nevirapine. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:1405–14.
    1. Arrive E, Newell ML, Ekouevi DK, et al. Prevalence of resistance to nevirapine in mothers and children after single-dose exposure to prevent vertical transmission of HIV-1: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:1009–21.
    1. Flys T, Nissley DV, Claasen CW, et al. Sensitive drug-resistance assays reveal long-term persistence of HIV-1 variants with the K103N nevirapine (NVP) resistance mutation in some women and infants after the administration of single-dose NVP: HIVNET 012. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:24–9.
    1. Flys TS, Chen S, Jones DC, et al. Quantitative analysis of HIV-1 variants with the K103N resistance mutation after single-dose nevirapine in women with HIV-1 subtypes A, C, and D. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42:610–3.
    1. Johnson JA, Li JF, Morris L, et al. Emergence of drug-resistant HIV-1 after intrapartum administration of single-dose nevirapine is substantially underestimated. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:16–23.
    1. Palmer S, Boltz V, Martinson N, et al. Persistence of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 in women after single-dose nevirapine therapy for prevention of maternal-to-fetal HIV-1 transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:7094–9.
    1. Boltz VF, Maldarelli F, Martinson N, et al. Optimization of allele-specific PCR using patient-specific HIV consensus sequences for primer design. J Virol Methods. 2010;164:122–6.
    1. Papin JF, Vahrson W, Dittmer DP. SYBR green-based real-time quantitative PCR assay for detection of West Nile Virus circumvents false-negative results due to strain variability. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:1511–8.
    1. Varghese V, Wang E, Babrzadeh F, et al. Nucleic acid template and the risk of a PCR-Induced HIV-1 drug resistance mutation. PLOS One. 2010;5:e10992.
    1. Coutsinos D, Invernizzi CF, Xu H, et al. Template usage is responsible for the preferential acquisition of the K65R reverse transcriptase mutation in subtype C variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 2009;83:2029–33.
    1. Harrigan PR, Sheen CW, Gill VS, et al. Silent mutations are selected in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and affect enzymatic efficiency. AIDS. 2008;22:2501–8.
    1. Invernizzi CF, Coutsinos D, Oliveira M, et al. Signature nucleotide polymorphisms at positions 64 and 65 in reverse transcriptase favor the selection of the K65R resistance mutation in HIV-1 subtype C. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1202–6.
    1. Bennett DE, Camacho RJ, Otelea D, et al. Drug resistance mutations for surveillance of transmitted HIV-1 drug-resistance: 2009 update. PLOS One. 2009;4:e4724.
    1. Shafer RW, Rhee SY, Pillay D, et al. HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase mutations for drug resistance surveillance. AIDS. 2007;21:215–23.
    1. Gifford RJ, Liu TF, Rhee SY, et al. The calibrated population resistance tool: standardized genotypic estimation of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1197–8.
    1. Newton CR, Graham A, Heptinstall LE, et al. Analysis of any point mutation in DNA. The amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:2503–16.
    1. Barbour JD, Hecht FM, Wrin T, et al. Persistence of primary drug resistance among recently HIV-1 infected adults. AIDS. 2004;18:1683–9.
    1. Jain V, Sucupira MC, Bacchetti P, et al. Differential persistence of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance mutation classes. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1174–81.
    1. Frankel FA, Invernizzi CF, Oliveira M, et al. Diminished efficiency of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase containing the K65R and M184V drug resistance mutations. AIDS. 2007;21:665–75.
    1. Miller MD, Anton KE, Mulato AS, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 expressing the lamivudine-associated M184V mutation in reverse transcriptase shows increased susceptibility to adefovir and decreased replication capability in vitro. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:92–100.
    1. White KL, Margot NA, Wrin T, et al. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with reverse transcriptase mutations K65R and K65R+M184V and their effects on enzyme function and viral replication capacity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:3437–46.
    1. Li JZ, Paredes R, Ribaudo HJ, et al. Low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations and risk of NNRTI-based antiretroviral treatment failure: a systematic review and pooled analysis. JAMA. 2011;305:1327–35.
    1. Programme HA. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2103. revision.
    1. Whitcomb JM, Parkin NT, Chappey C, et al. Broad nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor cross-resistance in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clinical isolates. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:992–1000.
    1. Ananworanich J, Schuetz A, Vandergeeten C, et al. Impact of multi-targeted antiretroviral treatment on gut T cell depletion and HIV reservoir seeding during acute HIV infection. PLOS One. 2012;7:e33948.
    1. Persaud D, Gay H, Ziemniak C, et al. Absence of detectable HIV-1 viremia after treatment cessation in an infant. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:1828–35.
    1. Hatano H, Bacon O, Cohen S, et al. Lack of detectable HIV DNA in a PrEP study participant treated during “hyperacute” HIV infection. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; Boston, MA USA. 2014. Vol. Abstract 397LB.
    1. Anderson PL, Kiser JJ, Gardner EM, et al. Pharmacological considerations for tenofovir and emtricitabine to prevent HIV infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66:240–50.
    1. Gilead Sciences I. TRUVADA medication guide. Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences, Inc; 2013.
    1. Margot NA, Enejosa J, Cheng AK, et al. Development of HIV-1 drug resistance through 144 weeks in antiretroviral-naive subjects on emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and efavirenz compared with lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz in study GS-01-934. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52:209–21.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera