Trends in Research with U.S. Military Service Member Participants: A Population-Specific ClinicalTrials.gov Review

Wendy A Cook, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Elizabeth J Bridges, Wendy A Cook, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Elizabeth J Bridges

Abstract

Background: ClinicalTrials.gov reviews have evaluated research trends for specific conditions and age groups but not for specific populations of research participants. No ClinicalTrials.gov reviews have evaluated research with military service member participants.

Purpose: Study objectives were (a) to use ClinicalTrials.gov to identify trends in biomedical research from 2005 to 2014 in which U.S. military service members actively participated as research participants and (b) to describe a search strategy for adaptation in future ClinicalTrials.gov reviews of specific participant populations.

Methods: A systematic review of ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify studies that included U.S. service members as participants, either exclusively or with other groups of participants.

Results: U.S. service members were identified as participants in 512 studies. Service members participated together with other groups in 392 studies, while 120 studies included only service members. The top five conditions of interest were post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, amputations, burns, and ocular injuries/disorders. The number of studies started each year peaked in 2011 and declined from 2012 to 2014. Twenty-five percent of studies exclusive to service members aimed to enroll 500 or more participants. Research exclusive to Guard and Reserve service members during this period was limited.

Conclusions: U.S. military service members participate in biomedical research. To address the health needs of U.S. service members, it is important to ensure there is not a prolonged decline in research among this population. The search strategy may be adapted to ClinicalTrials.gov reviews of specific participant populations for which straightforward searches are not possible.

Keywords: National Guard; active duty; post-traumatic stress disorder; research participation; traumatic brain injury.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of studies through the review.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of studies started per year, by study group. If study start date was not reported in ClinicalTrials.gov, then study first received date was used.

References

    1. Miller R.S., Weaver L.K., Bahraini N. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on symptoms and quality of life among service members with persistent postconcussion symptoms: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:43–52.
    1. Mac Donald C.L., Johnson A.M., Wierzechowski L. Prospectively assessed clinical outcomes in concussive blast vs nonblast traumatic brain injury among evacuated US military personnel. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:994–1002.
    1. Resick P.A., Wachen J.S., Mintz J. A randomized clinical trial of group cognitive processing therapy compared with group present-centered therapy for PTSD among active duty military personnel. J. Consult Clin. Psychol. 2015;83:1058–1068.
    1. Jain S., McMahon G.F., Hasen P. Healing touch with guided imagery for PTSD in returning active duty military: a randomized controlled trial. Mil. Med. 2012;177:1015–1021.
    1. Krueger C.A., Rivera J.C., Tennent D.J., Sheean A.J., Stinner D.J., Wenke J.C. Late amputation may not reduce complications or improve mental health in combat-related, lower extremity limb salvage patients. Injury. 2015;46:1527–1532.
    1. Quail J.F., McDonald V.S., Carter K.K., Weiss J.S., Casey K.M. A pulseless limb poorly predicts an arterial injury in combat trauma. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2015;29:1097–1104.
    1. Johnson B.W., Madson A.Q., Bong-Thakur S., Tucker D., Hale R.G., Chan R.K. Combat-related facial burns: analysis of strategic pitfalls. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015;73:106–111.
    1. Keneally R.J., Parsons A.M., Willett P.B. Warm fresh whole blood and thoracic trauma in Iraq and Afghanistan. J. Emerg. Trauma Shock. 2015;8:21–25.
    1. . background. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Uniform Requirements For Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication: Updated October 2004. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. Laine C., Horton R., DeAngelis C.D. Clinical trial registration: looking back and moving ahead. JAMA. 2007;298:93–94.
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals: Updated December 2014. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. US Food and Drug Administration: Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007: Public Law 110–85. Sec. 801. Expanded Clinical Trial Registry Data Bank. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. US Food and Drug Administration: Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997: Public Law 105–115. Sec. 113. Information Program on Clinical Trials for Serious or Life-Threatening Diseases. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. Chahal J., Tomescu S.S., Ravi B. Publication of sports medicine-related randomized controlled trials registered in . Am. J. Sports Med. 2012;40:1970–1977.
    1. Inrig J.K., Califf R.M., Tasneem A. The landscape of clinical trials in nephrology: a systematic review of . Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2014;63:771–780.
    1. Hirsch B.R., Califf R.M., Cheng S.K. Characteristics of oncology clinical trials: insights from a systematic analysis of . JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:972–979.
    1. Paul J.R., Ranganathan P. Clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a status report from the website. Rheumatol. Int. 2012;32:1831–1835.
    1. Zibelman M., Barth P., Handorf E. A review of interventional clinical trials in renal cell carcinoma: a status report from the WebSite. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer. 2015;13:142–149.
    1. Lebensburger J.D., Hilliard L.M., Pair L.E., Oster R., Howard T.H., Cutter G.R. Systematic review of interventional sickle cell trials registered in . Clin. Trials. 2015;12:575–583.
    1. Pasquali S.K., Lam W.K., Chiswell K., Kemper A.R., Li J.S. Status of the pediatric clinical trials enterprise: an analysis of the US registry. Pediatrics. 2012;130 e1269–77.
    1. Hill K.D., Chiswell K., Califf R.M., Pearson G., Li J.S. Characteristics of pediatric cardiovascular clinical trials registered on . Am. Heart J. 2014;167 921–929 e2.
    1. Alexander K.P., Kong D.F., Starr A.Z. Portfolio of clinical research in adult cardiovascular disease as reflected in . J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000009.
    1. : How to use advanced search. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. : protocol data element definitions. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. Congressional Research Service, Fischer H: A Guide to U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Freedom's Sentinel, Operation Inherent Resolve, Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. The White House Office of the Press Secretary: Executive order No. 13625, Improving Access to Mental Health Services for Veterans, Service Members, and Military Families. Available at ; (accessed 01.12.15).
    1. Department of Defense . August 31, 2012. Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education: National Research Action Plan: Responding to the Executive Order Improving Access to Mental Health Services for Veterans, Service Members, and Military Families. Available at. (accessed 01.12.15)
    1. Kelly P.J., Berkel L.A., Nilsson J.E. Postdeployment reintegration experiences of female soldiers from National Guard and Reserve units in the United States. Nurs. Res. 2014;63:346–356.
    1. Wilcox S.L., Oh H., Redmond S.A. A scope of the problem: post-deployment reintegration challenges in a National Guard Unit. Work. 2015;50:73–83.
    1. Goodwin R.D., Cohen G.H., Tamburrino M., Calabrese J.R., Liberzon I., Galea S. Mental health service use in a representative sample of National Gurard soldiers. Psychiatr. Serv. 2014;65:1347–1353.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera