Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study

Emily Eisner, Shôn Lewis, Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Ria Agass, Pauline Whelan, Clare Tower, Emily Eisner, Shôn Lewis, Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Ria Agass, Pauline Whelan, Clare Tower

Abstract

Background: Depression during the postnatal year is prevalent in mothers (17%) and fathers (9%), and suicide is the leading cause of maternal death in this period. Lifelong costs and consequences of untreated postnatal depression (PND) are high due to impacts on infants as well as parents. We aimed to improve access to PND treatment using digital screening. We developed a smartphone app (ClinTouch DAWN-P) that allows parents to monitor their mood daily with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), uploading responses in real-time to a secure server. We evaluated the app's feasibility, acceptability, validity and safety in a proof-of-concept study.

Methods: Pregnant women (≥ 36 weeks gestation) and partners were recruited from antenatal services and invited to complete daily EPDS assessments via the ClinTouch DAWN-P app until 6 weeks postpartum. Participants completed standard paper-based EPDS at two time points for validity comparisons. We examined app acceptability and usability at 6 weeks postpartum with qualitative interviews, examined using framework analysis, and the abridged Mobile App Rating Scale (convergent mixed methods design).

Results: Most (96%) eligible pregnant women approached were keen to try the app. Participating mothers (n = 15) and partners/fathers (n = 8) found the app easy to use, and 91% continued to use it for the full study period. Overall, 67% of daily app-based assessments were completed, with a history of depression predicting lower app usage. Participants suggested modifications to the app and its deployment to improve usability (e.g., extending the response window and including feedback and parenting advice). The validity of app-based responses was confirmed by high agreement with standard EPDS. App-based and paper-based ratings showed perfect agreement in identifying cases of likely PND. There were no serious adverse events relating to app use.

Conclusions: Digital PND screening appears feasible, acceptable, valid and safe. It also benefits from being remotely delivered: we enrolled all participants remotely during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Use of digital screening could address known shortcomings of conventional health visitor-delivered screening such as limited staff time, parental unwillingness to disclose difficulties to a professional, lack of partner/father screening, and language barriers.

Trial registration: The study was prospectively registered (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04279093 ).

Keywords: Digital mental health; Framework analysis; Maternal mental health; Mixed methods; Postnatal depression; Screening; Smartphone; mHealth.

Conflict of interest statement

PW and SWL are directors of Affigo CIC, a not-for-profit community interest company designed to make digital health products available in the NHS and public sector.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow through the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Level of app engagement per participant, averaged across the whole app use period
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Average responses to abridged MARS items

References

    1. Shorey S, Yin C, Chee I, Debby E, Huak Y, Wai W, et al. Prevalence and incidence of postpartum depression among healthy mothers : A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;104(July):235–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.08.001.
    1. Hahn-Holbrook J, Cornwell-Hinrichs T, Anaya I. Economic and Health Predictors of National Postpartum Depression Prevalence: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-Regression of 291 Studies from 56 Countries. Front Psychiatry. 2018;8(February):248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00248.
    1. Rao W, Zhu X, Zong Q, Zhang Q, Hall BJ. Journal of A ff ective Disorders Prevalence of prenatal and postpartum depression in fathers : A comprehensive meta-analysis of observational surveys. J Affect Disord. 2020;263(June 2019):491–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.030.
    1. Draper ES, Gallimore ID, Kurinczuk JJ, Kenyon S. Maternal, Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Confidential Enquiry Stillbirths and neonatal deaths in twin pregnancies. 2021.
    1. APA . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Slomian J, Honvo G, Emonts P, Reginster J, Bruyère O. Consequences of maternal postpartum depression : A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes. Women’s Heal. 2019;15:1–55.
    1. Bauer A, Parsonage M, Knapp M, Iemmi V, Adelaja B. The costs of perinatal mental health problems [Internet] London: Centre for Mental Health; 2014.
    1. Bobo WV, Yawn BP. Concise review for physicians and other clinicians: Postpartum depression. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(6):835–844. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.027.
    1. Greater Manchester Combined Authority . Greater Manchester Perinatal and Parent Infant Mental Health Service: Championing the 1001 Critical Days. 2020. Greater Manchester Perinatal and Parent Infant Mental Health Service: Championing the 1001 Critical Days.
    1. Parent-Infant Foundation . Parent-Infant Foundation: The First 1001 Days. 2021.
    1. Ramchandani P, Stein A, Evans J, Connor TGO, ALSPAC study team Paternal depression in the postnatal period and child development : a prospective population study. Lancet. 2005;365:2201–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66778-5.
    1. NHS England . The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019.
    1. Levis B, Negeri Z, Sun Y, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ( EPDS ) for screening to detect major depression among pregnant and postpartum women : systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ. 2020;371:m4022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4022.
    1. Smith MS, Lawrence V, Sadler E, Easter A. Barriers to accessing mental health services for women with perinatal mental illness: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies in the UK. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e024803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024803.
    1. Chew-Graham CA, Sharp D, Chamberlain E, Folkes L, Turner KM. Disclosure of symptoms of postnatal depression, the perspectives of health professionals and women: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2009;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-7.
    1. Office for National Statistics . 2011 Census Analysis: Ethnicity and Religion of the Non-UK Born Population in England and Wales. 2015. p. 5.
    1. Austin M. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology Marcé International Society position statement on psychosocial assessment and depression screening in perinatal women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(1):179–187. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.016.
    1. Darwin Z, Domoney J, Iles J, Bristow F, Siew J, Sethna V. Assessing the Mental Health of Fathers, Other Co-parents, and Partners in the Perinatal Period : Mixed Methods Evidence Synthesis. Front Psychiatry. 2021;11(January):1–18.
    1. Darwin Z, Domoney J, Iles J, Bristow F, McLeish J, Sethna V. Involving and supporting partners and other family members in specialist perinatal mental health services: Good practice guide. United Kingdom: NHS England; 2021.
    1. Poushter J. Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies. Pew Research Centre; 2016. ( cited 2021 Jun 28).
    1. Pew Research Center . Demographics of Mobile Device Ownership and Adoption in the United States | Pew Research Center. 2021.
    1. Eisner E, Drake RJ, Berry N, Barrowclough C, Emsley R, Machin M, et al. Development and Long-Term Acceptability of ExPRESS, a Mobile Phone App to Monitor Basic Symptoms and Early Signs of Psychosis Relapse. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(3):e11568. doi: 10.2196/11568.
    1. Hussain-Shamsy N, Shah A, Vigod SN, Zaheer J. Mobile Health for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety : Scoping Review Corresponding Author. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e17011. doi: 10.2196/17011.
    1. Van Den Heuvel JFM, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JHW. eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care : An Overview of the Literature Corresponding Author. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e202. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9262.
    1. Dol J, Richardson B, Murphy GT, Aston M, Mcmillan D, Campbell-yeo M. Impact of mobile health interventions during the perinatal period on maternal psychosocial outcomes : a systematic review. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(1):30–55.
    1. Marcano-Belisario JS, Gupta AK, Donoghue JO, Ramchandani P, Morrison C, Car J. Implementation of depression screening in antenatal clinics through tablet computers : results of a feasibility study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(59):1–11.
    1. Kingston D, Austin M, Van ZSV. Pregnant Women ‘ s Views on the Feasibility and Acceptability of Web-Based Mental Health E-Screening Versus Paper-Based Screening : A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:1–18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6866.
    1. Krishnamurti T, Davis AL, Wong-Parodi G, Fischhoff B, Sadovsky Y, Simhan HN. Development and Testing of the MyHealthyPregnancy App: A Behavioral Decision Research-Based Tool for Assessing and Communicating Pregnancy Risk. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(4):e42. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7036.
    1. Hantsoo L, Criniti S, Khan A, Moseley M, Kincler N, Faherty LJ, et al. A Mobile Application for Monitoring and Management of Depressed Mood in a Vulnerable Pregnant Population. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(1):104–7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600582.
    1. Doherty K, Mastellos N, Morrison C, Doherty G, Cohn M. Engagement with Mental Health Screening on Mobile Devices : Results from an Antenatal Feasibility Study. 2019. pp. 1–15.
    1. Ricketts S. Screening for Depression in Pregnancy — There ‘ s an App for That! Innov Prim Care. 2019;17(3):2019.
    1. Ivers N. Proactive, Personalised Postpartum Mental Healthcare (P3MH) 2019.
    1. Guille C. Pilot RCT: Remote SBIRT Vs. In-Person SBIRT. 2020.
    1. Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6 Pt 2):2134. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117.
    1. Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government. The English Indices of Deprivation 2019 [Internet]. . 2019 [cited 2021 Aug 21]. Available from:
    1. Husain N, Rahman A, Husain M, Khan SM, Vyas A, Tomenson B, et al. Detecting Depression in Pregnancy: Validation of EPDS in British Pakistani Mothers. J Immigr Minor Heal. 2014;16:1085–1092. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-9981-2.
    1. Ghubash R, Abou-Saleh MT, Daradkeh TK. The validity of the Arabic Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997;32:474–476. doi: 10.1007/BF00789142.
    1. Lee DTS, Yip SK, Chiu HFK, Leung TY, Chan KPM, Chau IOL, et al. Detecting postnatal depression in Chinese women: Validation of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;172(5):433–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.5.433.
    1. Mazhari S, Nakhaee N. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Iranian sample. Arch Women’s Ment Heal. 2007;10(6):293–7. doi: 10.1007/s00737-007-0204-x.
    1. Gausia K, Fisher C, Algin S, Oosthuizen J. Validation of the Bangla version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for a Bangladeshi sample. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2007;25(4):308–15. doi: 10.1080/02646830701644896.
    1. Wallis A, Fernandez R, Oprescu F, Cherecheş R, Zlati A, Dungy C. Validation of a Romanian scale to detect antenatal depression. Open Med. 2012;7(2):216–23. doi: 10.2478/s11536-011-0130-1/html.
    1. Gumley A, Bradstreet S, Ainsworth J, Allan S, Alvarez-Jiminez M, Artis J, et al. Early signs Monitoring to Prevent relapse in psychosis and prOmote Wellbeing, Engagement and Recovery (EMPOWER): A feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial harnessing smartphone technology blended with peer support. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(1):e15058. doi: 10.2196/15058.
    1. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3422.
    1. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera