Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the dabigatran reversal agent idarucizumab during Phase I studies

Stephen Norris, Steven Ramael, Ippei Ikushima, Wouter Haazen, Akiko Harada, Viktoria Moschetti, Susumu Imazu, Paul A Reilly, Benjamin Lang, Joachim Stangier, Stephan Glund, Stephen Norris, Steven Ramael, Ippei Ikushima, Wouter Haazen, Akiko Harada, Viktoria Moschetti, Susumu Imazu, Paul A Reilly, Benjamin Lang, Joachim Stangier, Stephan Glund

Abstract

Aims: Idarucizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-dabigatran antibody fragment, is effective in emergency reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation. Pre-existing and treatment-emergent anti-idarucizumab antibodies (antidrug antibodies; ADA) may affect the safety and efficacy of idarucizumab. This analysis characterized the pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA and assessed their impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of idarucizumab.

Methods: Data were pooled from three Phase I, randomized, double-blind idarucizumab studies in healthy Caucasian subjects; elderly, renally impaired subjects; and healthy Japanese subjects. In plasma sampled before and after idarucizumab dosing, ADA were detected and titrated using a validated electrochemiluminescence method. ADA epitope specificities were examined using idarucizumab and two structurally related molecules. Idarucizumab PK/PD data were compared for subjects with and without pre-existing ADA.

Results: Pre-existing ADA were found in 33 out of 283 individuals (11.7%), seven of whom had intermittent ADA. Titres of pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA were low, estimated equivalent to <0.3% of circulating idarucizumab after a 5 g dose. Pre-existing ADA had no impact on dose-normalized idarucizumab maximum plasma levels and exposure and, although data were limited, no impact on the reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation by idarucizumab. Treatment-emergent ADA were detected in 20 individuals (19 out of 224 treated [8.5%]; 1 out of 59 received placebo [1.7%]) and were transient in ten. The majority had specificity primarily toward the C-terminus of idarucizumab. There were no adverse events indicative of immunogenic reactions.

Conclusion: Pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA were present at extremely low levels relative to the idarucizumab dosage under evaluation. The PK/PD of idarucizumab appeared to be unaffected by the presence of pre-existing ADA.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01688830 NCT01955720 NCT02028780.

Keywords: antibodies; anticoagulants; coagulation; immunology; pharmacokinetics.

© 2017 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pre‐existing anti‐idarucizumab responses in plasma from treatment‐naïve individuals from the three Phase I studies evaluated. (A) blocking of ADA assay responses by idarucizumab, (B) blocking of ADA assay responses with molecule 2 (a Fab with constant regions CH1 and CL identical to those in idarucizumab, but with different variable regions), and (C) lack of blocking of ADA assay response by molecule 1 (a full‐length IgG1 molecule containing two idarucizumab Fab fragments). ADA, antidrug antibody; RLU, relative luminescence units
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of (A) dose‐normalized maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of idarucizumab for all subjects with normal renal function who received a single 5‐min idarucizumab infusion and (B) dose‐normalized area under the plasma idarucizumab concentration–time curve (AUC0–∞) values for all subjects with normal renal function with and without pre‐existing anti‐idarucizumab antibodies; pooled data from the three Phase I studies. ADA, antidrug antibodies; AUC, area under the curve; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; P5, P10, P90 and P95, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th centiles
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of (A) mean diluted thrombin time assay and (B) ecarin clotting time assay results after anticoagulation with dabigatran followed by infusion of 5 g idarucizumab with and without pre‐existing anti‐idarucizumab antibodies in volunteers.a  aThe figure includes all subjects who received a total dose of 5 g idarucizumab: n = 6, middle‐aged; n = 8, elderly; n = 6, mild renal impairment; n = 6, moderate renal impairment; n = 9, healthy Japanese volunteers. ADA, antidrug antibodies; ULN, upper limit of normal

References

    1. Southan C, Sharman JL, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Alexander SP, et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. Nucl Acids Res 2016; 44: D1054–D1068.
    1. Alexander SPH, Fabbro D, Kelly E, Marrion N, Peters JA, Benson HE, et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: Enzymes. Br J Pharmacol 2015; 172: 6024–6109.
    1. Seeger JD, Bartels DB, Huybrechts K, Bykov K, Shash D, Zint K, et al. Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran relative to warfarin in routine care. Circulation 2015; 130: 16227.
    1. Villines TC, Schnee J, Fraeman K, Siu K, Reynolds MW, Collins J, et al. The comparative safety and effectiveness of the oral anticoagulant (OAC) dabigatran versus warfarin utilized in a large healthcare system in non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients [abstract]. Circulation 2014; 130: 18353.
    1. Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M, Zhang R, Southworth MR, Levenson M, et al. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2015; 131: 157–164.
    1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139–1151.
    1. Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, Mismetti P, Schellong S, Eriksson H, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2342–2352.
    1. Schulman S, Kakkar AK, Goldhaber SZ, Schellong S, Eriksson H, Mismetti P, et al. Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis. Circulation 2014; 129: 764–772.
    1. Ageno W, Gallus AS, Wittkowsky A, Crowther M, Hylek EM, Palareti G. Oral anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence‐Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: e44S–e88S.
    1. Glund S, Moschetti VF, Norris S, Stangier J, Schmohl M, van Ryn J, et al. A randomised study in healthy volunteers to investigate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of idarucizumab, a specific antidote to dabigatran. Thromb Haemost 2015; 133: 943–951.
    1. Pollack CVJ, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J, Glund S, Verhamme P, Bernstein RA, et al. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 511–520.
    1. Ansell JE, Bakhru SH, Laulicht BE, Steiner SS, Grosso M, Brown K, et al. Use of PER977 to reverse the anticoagulant effect of edoxaban. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 2141–2142.
    1. Greinacher A, Thiele T, Selleng K. Reversal of anticoagulants: an overview of current developments. Thromb Haemost 2015; 113: 931–942.
    1. Majeed A, Schulman S. Bleeding and antidotes in new oral anticoagulants. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2013; 26: 191–201.
    1. Glund S, Stangier J, Schmohl M, Gansser D, Norris S, van Ryn J, et al. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of idarucizumab for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in healthy male volunteers: a randomised, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind phase 1 trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 680–690.
    1. Schiele F, van Ryn J, Canada K, Newsome C, Sepulveda E, Park J, et al. A specific antidote for dabigatran: functional and structural characterization. Blood 2013; 121: 3554–3562.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services , Food and Drug Administration (FDA) , Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) , Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) . Guidance for industry: immunogenicity assessment for therapeutic protein products, 2014. Available at (last accessed 23 June 2015).
    1. European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) . Guideline on immunogenicity assessment of biotechnology‐derived therapeutic proteins, 2007. Available at (last accessed 22 June 2015).
    1. Sethu S, Govindappa KF, Alhaidari MF, Pirmohamed MF, Park KF, Sathish J. Immunogenicity to biologics: mechanisms, prediction and reduction. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2012; 60: 331–344.
    1. Jawa V, Cousens LP, Awwad M, Wakshull E, Kropshofer H, De Groot AS. T‐cell dependent immunogenicity of protein therapeutics: preclinical assessment and mitigation. Clin Immunol 2013; 149: 534–555.
    1. Lecluse LL, Driessen RJ, Spuls PI, de Jong EM, Stapel SO, van Doorn MB, et al. Extent and clinical consequences of antibody formation against adalimumab in patients with plaque psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 127–132.
    1. Steenholdt C, Palarasah Y, Bendtzen K, Teisner A, Brynskov J, Teisner B, et al. Pre‐existing IgG antibodies cross‐reacting with the Fab region of infliximab predict efficacy and safety of infliximab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 1172–1183.
    1. Creeke PI, Farrell RA. Clinical testing for neutralizing antibodies to interferon‐beta in multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2013; 6: 3–17.
    1. Glund S, Stangier JF, Schmohl M, Moschetti V, Haazen W, De Smet M, et al. Idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran: immediate, complete and sustained reversal of dabigatran induced anticoagulation in elderly and renally impaired subjects (344) [abstract]. Blood 2014; 124: 344.
    1. van Ryn J, Yasaka M, Ikushima I, Harada A, Taniguchi A, Imazu S, et al. Idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent for dabigatran: immediate, complete and sustained reversal of dabigatran‐induced anticoagulation in Japanese healthy male volunteers (2627) [abstract]. Blood 2016; 128: 2627.
    1. Shankar G, Devanarayan V, Amaravadi L, Barrett YC, Bowsher R, Finco‐Kent D, et al. Recommendations for the validation of immunoassays used for detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2008; 48: 1267–1281.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services , Food and Drug Administration (FDA) , Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) , Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) . Guidance for industry: assay development for immunogenicity testing of therapeutic proteins; draft guidance, 2009. Available at (last accessed 22 June 2015).
    1. Shankar G, Arkin S, Cocea L, Devanarayan V, Kirshner S, Kromminga A, et al. Assessment and reporting of the clinical immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins and peptides‐harmonized terminology and tactical recommendations. AAPS J 2014; 16: 658–673.
    1. Rup B, Pallardy M, Sikkema D, Albert T, Allez M, Broet P, et al. Standardizing terms, definitions and concepts for describing and interpreting unwanted immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals: recommendations of the Innovative Medicines Initiative ABIRISK consortium. Clin Exp Immunol 2015; 181: 385–400.
    1. Pollack CVJ, Reilly PA, Bernstein R, Dubiel R, Eikelboom J, Glund S, et al. Design and rationale for RE‐VERSE AD: a phase 3 study of idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent for dabigatran. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114: 198–205.
    1. Xue L, Rup B. Evaluation of pre‐existing antibody presence as a risk factor for posttreatment anti‐drug antibody induction: analysis of human clinical study data for multiple biotherapeutics. AAPS J 2013; 15: 893–896.
    1. Tatarewicz SM, Juan G, Swanson SJ, Moxness MS. Epitope characterization of pre‐existing and developing antibodies to an aglycosylated monoclonal antibody therapeutic of G1m17,1 allotype. J Immunol Methods 2012; 382: 93–100.
    1. Brezski RJ, Knight DM, Jordan RE. The origins, specificity, and potential biological relevance of human anti‐IgG hinge autoantibodies. Scientific World Journal 2011; 11: 1153–1167.
    1. Brezski RJ, Luongo JL, Petrone D, Ryan MH, Zhong D, Tam SH, et al. Human anti‐IgG1 hinge autoantibodies reconstitute the effector functions of proteolytically inactivated IgGs. J Immunol 2008; 181: 3183–3192.
    1. Van Schie KA, Wolbink GJ, Rispens T. Cross‐reactive and pre‐existing antibodies to therapeutic antibodies – effects on treatment and immunogenicity. MAbs 2015; 7: 662–671.
    1. Curtis BR, Swyers J, Divgi A, McFarland JG, Aster RH. Thrombocytopenia after second exposure to abciximab is caused by antibodies that recognize abciximab‐coated platelets. Blood 2002; 99: 2054–2059.
    1. Glund S, Stangier J, van Ryn J, Schmohl M, Moschetti V, Haazen W, et al. Re‐starting dabigatran etexilate 24 hours after reversal with idarucizumab and re dosing idarucizumab in healthy volunteers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 1654–1656.
    1. Pollack CVJ, Reilly PA, van Ryn J, Eikelboom J, Glund S, Bernstein RA, et al Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant effects of Dabigatran in patients in an emergency setting of major bleeding, urgent surgery, or interventions, 2016. Available at (last accessed 19 December 2016).

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera