UTAH: Using Telemedicine to improve early medical Abortion at Home: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing face-to-face with telephone consultations for women seeking early medical abortion

John Joseph Reynolds-Wright, John Norrie, Sharon Tracey Cameron, John Joseph Reynolds-Wright, John Norrie, Sharon Tracey Cameron

Abstract

Introduction: Early medical abortion (EMA) is a two-stage process of terminating pregnancy using oral mifepristone (a progesterone-receptor antagonist) followed usually 1-2 days later by sublingual, vaginal or buccal misoprostol (a prostaglandin analogue). There are no published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of telemedicine for EMA. Our proposed research will determine if telephone consultations for EMA (the most common method of abortion in the UK) is non-inferior to standard face-to-face consultations with regard to the efficacy of EMA.

Methods and analysis: This study will be conducted as an RCT. The recruitment target is 1222 participants.The primary outcome is success of EMA (complete abortion rate). This will be determined based on a negative low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test result (2 weeks after misoprostol use) and absence of surgical intervention or diagnosis of ongoing pregnancy (within 6 weeks of misoprostol).Secondary outcomes include total time spent at a clinic appointment to receive EMA, self-reported preparedness for EMA, level of satisfaction with consultation and effective contraception uptake compared with when women attend for a face-to-face consultation.The main analysis will be a modified intention-to-treat analysis. This will include all randomised women (with a viable pregnancy) using EMA and follow-up for the main outcome. The study initiated on 13 January 2020 and is anticipated to finish in late 2021.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was given by the South East Scotland NHS Research Ethics Committee, reference: 19/SS/0111. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at clinical and academic meetings, and shared with participants via the clinic website.

Trial registration number: NCT04139382.

Keywords: community gynaecology; gynaecology; public health; reproductive medicine; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Professor JN was Deputy Chair of the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) General Funding Committee (2016-2019) and is currently Chair of the Medical Research Council (MRC)/NIHR Efficacy and Mechanisms Evaluation (EME) Funding Committee.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Information Services Division (ISD) Scotland, NHS National Services Scotland . Termination of pregnancy statistics: year ending December, 2018. Available: [Accessed 07 Mar 2020].
    1. Hyland P, Raymond EG, Chong E. A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: retrospective analysis of the first 18 months. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;58:335–40. 10.1111/ajo.12800
    1. Grossman D, Grindlay K. Safety of medical abortion provided through telemedicine compared with in person. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:778–82. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002212
    1. Grossman D, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, et al. . Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:296–303. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318224d110
    1. Wiebe ER. Use of telemedicine for providing medical abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014;124:177–8. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.038
    1. Kohn JE, Snow JL, Simons HR, et al. . Medication abortion provided through telemedicine in four U.S. states. Obstet Gynecol 2019;134:343–50. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003357
    1. Singh S, Remez L, Sedgh G. Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress and unequal access. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2019.
    1. Abortion statistics for England and Wales, 2018. Available: [Accessed 07 March 2020].
    1. World Health Organization . Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception. Available: [Accessed 07 Mar 2020].
    1. Scottish Government, Chief Medical Officer Directorate . Abortion - Improvement to existing services - Approval for Misoprostol to be taken at home. Available: [Accessed 07 Mar 2020].
    1. Cameron ST, Glasier A, Johnstone A, et al. . Can women determine the outcome of medical termination themselves? Contraception 2015;91:6–11.
    1. Millar SL, Cameron ST. Comparison of two low-sensitivity urine pregnancy tests for confirming the success of early medical abortion. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2018;44:54–7. 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-101868
    1. Lohr PA, Aiken ARA, Forsyth T, et al. . Telephone or integrated contraception counselling before abortion: impact on method choice and receipt. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2018;44:114–21. 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-101818
    1. Finch R, McGeechan K, Johnstone A, et al. . Impact of the introduction of ‘home’ as a legal setting for self-administration of misoprostol for early medical abortions: a prospective observational cohort study. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2019. [Epub ahead of print: Epub ahead of print].
    1. UK Government . The Abortion Act 1967. Accessed via:. Available: [Accessed on 07 March 2020].
    1. Calderwood C. Realising realistic medicine: chief medical officer for Scotland annual report 2015-2016. Scottish government. 27 February 2017. ISBN: 9781786526731. accessible via. Available:
    1. Whitehouse KC, Kim CR, Ganatra B, et al. . Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): a protocol for developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set for medical and surgical abortion. Contraception 2017;95:437–41. 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.009
    1. Creinin MD, Chen MJ. Medical abortion reporting of efficacy: the MARE guidelines. Contraception 2016;94:97–103. 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.013
    1. Sealed Envelope Ltd . Power calculator for binary outcome non-inferiority trial, 2012. Available: [Accessed 07 Mar 2020].
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. . The REDCap Consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208. 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and abortion care: information for healthcare professionals, 2020. Available:

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera