Mobilization of mercury and arsenic in humans by sodium 2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonate (DMPS)

H V Aposhian, H V Aposhian

Abstract

Sodium 2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonate (DMPS, Dimaval) is a water-soluble chelating agent that can be given by mouth or systemically and has been used to treat metal intoxication since the 1960s in the former Soviet Union and since 1978 in Germany. To better approximate the body burdens of Hg and As in humans, DMPS-Hg andDMPS-As challenge tests have been developed. The tests involve collecting an overnight urine, administering 300 mg DMPS at zero time, collecting the urine from 0 to 6 hr, and determining the urinary Hg before and after DMPS is given. The challenge test, when applied to normal college student volunteers with and without amalgam restorations in their mouths, indicated that two-thirds of the Hg excreted in the urine after DMPS administration originated in their dental amalgams. In addition, there was a positive linear correlation between the amalgam score (a measure of amalgam surface) and urinary Hg after the challenge test. When the DMPS-Hg challenge test was used to study dental personnel occupationally exposed to Hg, the urinary excretion of Hg was 88, 49, and 35 times greater after DMPS administration than before administration in 10 dental technicians, 5 dentists, and 13 nondental personnel, respectively. DMPS also was used to measure the body burden of humans with a history of drinking water containing 600 microgram As/liter. DMPS administration resulted in a tripling of the monomethylarsonic acid percentage and a halving of the dimethylarsinic acid percentage as related to total urinary As. Because South American animals studied were deficient in arsenite methyltransferase, a hypothesis is presented that arsenite and arsenite methyltransferase may have had a role in the evolution of some South American animals.

References

    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991 Nov;259(2):808-14
    1. Biochem Pharmacol. 1988 Aug 15;37(16):3149-53
    1. Br J Ind Med. 1992 Jun;49(6):387-93
    1. Environ Res. 1993 Feb;60(2):161-77
    1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1993;33:409-34
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Apr;37(4):825-34
    1. FASEB J. 1993 Dec;7(15):1432-3
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994 Feb;268(2):662-8
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 Jan;272(1):264-74
    1. Toxicology. 1995 Mar 31;97(1-3):23-38
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1988;66(4):499-506
    1. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1989 Feb;97(2):338-49
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2607-11
    1. Biochem Pharmacol. 1989 Apr 1;38(7):1147-54
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989 May;45(5):520-6
    1. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1989 Aug;100(1):96-106
    1. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1990 Apr;14(3):598-607
    1. Zahnarztl Mitt. 1989 Sep 1;79(17):1866-8
    1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1990;30:279-306
    1. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63(3):187-92
    1. Analyst. 1995 Mar;120(3):853-4
    1. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1995 Aug;133(2):262-8
    1. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1995 Dec;135(2):172-8
    1. Chem Res Toxicol. 1995 Dec;8(8):1029-38
    1. Chem Biol Interact. 1996 Jan 5;99(1-3):147-64
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996 May;277(2):938-44
    1. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995 Dec 7;293(4):455-62
    1. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1996 Sep;140(1):77-84
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Nov;104(11):1200-7
    1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997;37:397-419
    1. Mutat Res. 1997 Jun;386(3):229-39
    1. Farmakol Toksikol. 1958 May-Jun;21(3):53-9
    1. Chem Biol Interact. 1982 Nov;42(2):165-77
    1. Hum Toxicol. 1983 Jan;2(1):121-33
    1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1983;23:193-215
    1. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1985 Feb;14(2):187-98
    1. Arch Toxicol. 1985 Jun;57(2):119-24
    1. Arch Toxicol. 1985 Jun;57(2):125-9
    1. Cancer Res. 1985 Nov;45(11 Pt 2):5895-9
    1. J Chromatogr. 1986 Jan 24;374(2):297-310
    1. Environ Res. 1987 Feb;42(1):257-74
    1. Anal Biochem. 1987 Jan;160(1):217-26
    1. FASEB J. 1992 Apr;6(7):2472-6

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera