Impact of glycemic and blood pressure variability on surrogate measures of cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients

Alessandra Di Flaviani, Fabiana Picconi, Paola Di Stefano, Ilaria Giordani, Ilaria Malandrucco, Paola Maggio, Paola Palazzo, Fabrizio Sgreccia, Carlo Peraldo, Fabrizio Farina, Gaetano Frajese, Simona Frontoni, Alessandra Di Flaviani, Fabiana Picconi, Paola Di Stefano, Ilaria Giordani, Ilaria Malandrucco, Paola Maggio, Paola Palazzo, Fabrizio Sgreccia, Carlo Peraldo, Fabrizio Farina, Gaetano Frajese, Simona Frontoni

Abstract

Objective: The effect of glycemic variability (GV) on cardiovascular risk has not been fully clarified in type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effect of GV, blood pressure (BP), and oxidative stress on intima-media thickness (IMT), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and sympathovagal balance (low frequency [LF]/high frequency [HF] ratio) in 26 type 2 diabetic patients (diabetes duration 4.41±4.81 years; HbA1c 6.70±1.25%) receiving diet and/or metformin treatment, with no hypotensive treatment or complications.

Research design and methods: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were used to calculate mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA)-2, mean blood glucose (MBG), mean postprandial glucose excursion (MPPGE), and incremental area under the curve (IAUC). Blood pressure (BP), circadian rhythm, and urinary 15-F2t-isoprostane (8-iso-prostaglandin F2α [PGF2α]) were also evaluated. Subjects were divided into dipper (D) and nondipper (ND) groups according to ΔBP.

Results: IMT and LVMI were increased in ND versus D (0.77±0.08 vs. 0.68±0.13 [P=0.04] and 67±14 vs. 55±11 [P=0.03], respectively). MBG, MAGE, and IAUC were significantly associated with LF/HF ratio at night (r=0.50, P=0.01; r=0.40, P=0.04; r=0.41, P=0.04, respectively), MPPGE was negatively associated with FMD (r=-0.45, P=0.02), and CONGA-2 was positively associated with LVMI (r=0.55, P=0.006). The Δsystolic BP was negatively associated with IMT (r=-0.43, P=0.03) and with LVMI (r=-0.52, P=0.01). Urinary 8-iso-PGF2α was positively associated with LVMI (r=0.68 P<0.001).

Conclusions: An impaired GV and BP variability is associated with endothelial and cardiovascular damage in short-term diabetic patients with optimal metabolic control. Oxidative stress is the only independent predictor of increased LV mass and correlates with glucose and BP variability.

References

    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;321:405–412
    1. Kilpatrick ES. Arguments for and against the role of glucose variability in the development of diabetes complications. J Diabetes Sci Tech 2009;3:649–655
    1. Nalysnyk L, Hernandez-Medina M, Krishnarajah G. Glycaemic variability and complications in patients with diabetes mellitus: evidence from a systematic review of the literature. Diabetes Obes Metab 2010;12:288–298
    1. Cavalot F, Petrelli A, Traversa M, et al. Postprandial blood glucose is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly in women: lessons from the San Luigi Gonzaga Diabetes Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:813–819
    1. Monnier L, Colette C, Mas E, et al. Regulation of oxidative stress by glycaemic control: evidence for an independent inhibitory effect of insulin therapy. Diabetologia 2010;53:562–571
    1. Ceriello A, Esposito K, Piconi L, et al. Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes 2008;57:1349–1354
    1. O’Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O’Malley K. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol. J Hypertens 1991;9:573–574
    1. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 1996;17:354–381
    1. Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, Ackerman E, Gatewood LC, Taylor WF. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes 1970;19:644–655
    1. McDonnell CM, Donath SM, Vidmar SI, Werther GA, Cameron FJ. A novel approach to continuous glucose analysis utilizing glycemic variation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:253–263
    1. Roman MJ, Pickering TG, Schwartz JE, Cavallini MC, Pini R, Devereux RB. Is the absence of a normal nocturnal fall in blood pressure (nondipping) associated with cardiovascular target organ damage? J Hypertens 1997;15:969–978
    1. Riley WA, Barnes RW, Applegate WB, et al. Reproducibility of noninvasive ultrasonic measurement of carotid atherosclerosis. The Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Plaque Study. Stroke 1992;23:1062–1068
    1. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. ; American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee; Task Force on Chamber Quantification; American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee; American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography, European Society of Cardiology Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocadiography 2006;7:79–108
    1. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, et al. ; International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:257–265
    1. Cuspidi C, Michev I, Meani S, et al. Reduced nocturnal fall in blood pressure, assessed by two ambulatory blood pressure monitorings and cardiac alterations in early phases of untreated essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2003;17:245–251
    1. Gambardella S, Frontoni S, Spallone V, et al. Increased left ventricular mass in normotensive diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy. Am J Hypertens 1993;6:97–102
    1. Felício JS, Pacheco JT, Ferreira SR, et al. Hyperglycemia and nocturnal systolic blood pressure are associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive diabetic patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2006;5:19.
    1. Henry RM, Kamp O, Kostense PJ, et al. Left ventricular mass increases with deteriorating glucose tolerance, especially in women: independence of increased arterial stiffness or decreased flow-mediated dilation: the Hoorn study. Diabetes Care 2004;27:522–529
    1. Eguchi K, Ishikawa J, Hoshide S, Ishikawa S, Shimada K, Kario K. Impact of blood pressure vs. glycemic factors on target organ damage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2006;8:404–410
    1. Cameron FJ, Donath SM, Baghurst PA. Measuring glycaemic variation. Curr Diabetes Rev 2010;6:17–26
    1. Esposito K, Ciotola M, Carleo D, et al. Post-meal glucose peaks at home associate with carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:1345–1350
    1. Karrei K, Koehler C, Hanefeld M, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T, Del Prato S. Fluctuations in glycaemia in clinical diabetes mellitus type 2 are not associated with carotid intima-media thickening. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2004;1:51–52
    1. Shige H, Ishikawa T, Suzukawa M, et al. Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation in the postprandial state in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:1272–1274, A9
    1. Frontoni S, Bracaglia D, Baroni A, et al. Early autonomic dysfunction in glucose-tolerant but insulin-resistant offspring of type 2 diabetic patients. Hypertension 2003;41:1223–1227
    1. Lu CL, Zou X, Orr WC, Chen JD. Postprandial changes of sympathovagal balance measured by heart rate variability. Dig Dis Sci 1999;44:857–861

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera