A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Oral Camostat Mesylate for Early Treatment of COVID-19 Outpatients Showed Shorter Illness Course and Attenuation of Loss of Smell and Taste

Geoffrey Chupp, Anne Spichler-Moffarah, Ole S Søgaard, Denise Esserman, James Dziura, Lisa Danzig, Reetika Chaurasia, Kailash P Patra, Aryeh Salovey, Angela Nunez, Jeanine May, Lauren Astorino, Amisha Patel, Stephanie Halene, Jianhui Wang, Pei Hui, Prashant Patel, Jing Lu, Fangyong Li, Geliang Gan, Stephen Parziale, Lily Katsovich, Gary V Desir, Joseph M Vinetz, Geoffrey Chupp, Anne Spichler-Moffarah, Ole S Søgaard, Denise Esserman, James Dziura, Lisa Danzig, Reetika Chaurasia, Kailash P Patra, Aryeh Salovey, Angela Nunez, Jeanine May, Lauren Astorino, Amisha Patel, Stephanie Halene, Jianhui Wang, Pei Hui, Prashant Patel, Jing Lu, Fangyong Li, Geliang Gan, Stephen Parziale, Lily Katsovich, Gary V Desir, Joseph M Vinetz

Abstract

Importance: Early treatment of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection might lower the risk of clinical deterioration in COVID-19.

Objective: To determine whether oral camostat mesylate would reduce upper respiratory SARS-CoV-2 viral load in newly diagnosed outpatients with mild COVID-19, and would lead to improvement in COVID-19 symptoms.

Design: From June, 2020 to April, 2021, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.

Setting: Single site, academic medical center, outpatient setting in Connecticut, USA.

Participants: Of 568 COVID-19 positive potential adult participants diagnosed within 3 days of study entry and assessed for eligibility, 70 were randomized and 498 were excluded (198 did not meet eligibility criteria, 37 were not interested, 265 were excluded for unknown or other reasons). The primary inclusion criteria were a positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification result in adults within 3 days of screening regardless of COVID-19 symptoms.

Intervention: Treatment was 7 days of oral camostat mesylate, 200 mg po four times a day, or placebo.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was reduction of 4-day log 10 nasopharyngeal swab viral load by 0.5 log 10 compared to placebo. The main prespecified secondary outcome was reduction in symptom scores as measured by a quantitative Likert scale instrument, Flu-PRO-Plus modified to measure changes in smell/taste measured using FLU-PRO-Plus.

Results: Participants receiving camostat had statistically significant lower quantitative symptom scores (FLU-Pro-Plus) at day 6, accelerated overall symptom resolution and notably improved taste/smell, and fatigue beginning at onset of intervention in the camostat mesylate group compared to placebo. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that camostat mesylate was not associated with a reduction in 4-day log 10 NP viral load compared to placebo.

Conclusions and relevance: The camostat group had more rapid resolution of COVID-19 symptoms and amelioration of the loss of taste and smell. Camostat compared to placebo was not associated with reduction in nasopharyngeal SARS-COV-2 viral load. Additional clinical trials are warranted to validate the role of camostat mesylate on SARS-CoV-2 infection in the treatment of mild COVID-19.

Trial registration clinicaltrialsgov nct04353284 04/20/20: ( https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04353284?term=camostat+%2C+yale&draw=2&rank=1 ).

Key points: Question: Will early treatment of COVID-19 with a repurposed medication, camostat mesylate, improve clinical outcomes?Findings: In this phase 2 randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial that included 70 adults with early COVID-19, the oral administration of camostat mesylate treatment within 3 days of diagnosis prevented the loss of smell/taste and reduced the duration of illness.Meaning: In the current COVID-19 pandemic, phase III testing of an inexpensive, repurposed drug for early COVID-19 is warranted.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Enrollment, Randomization, and Analysis Populations
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva viral loads in camostat vs. placebo groups.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparison of patient-reported symptom scores in camostat vs. placebo groups

References

    1. Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, et al. REGN-COV2, a Neutralizing Antibody Cocktail, in Outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. Jan 21 2021;384(3):238–251. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2035002
    1. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. Apr 16 2020;181(2):271–280 e8. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
    1. Hoffmann M, Hofmann-Winkler H, Smith JC, et al. Camostat mesylate inhibits SARS-CoV-2 activation by TMPRSS2-related proteases and its metabolite GBPA exerts antiviral activity. EBioMedicine. Mar 2021;65:103255. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103255
    1. Hoffmann M, Schroeder S, Kleine-Weber H, Muller MA, Drosten C, Pohlmann S. Nafamostat Mesylate Blocks Activation of SARS-CoV-2: New Treatment Option for COVID-19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. May 21 2020;64(6)doi:10.1128/AAC.00754-20
    1. Sun W, Zhang X, Cummings MD, et al. Targeting Enteropeptidase with Reversible Covalent Inhibitors To Achieve Metabolic Benefits. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. Dec 2020;375(3):510–521. doi:10.1124/jpet.120.000219
    1. Zhou Y, Vedantham P, Lu K, et al. Protease inhibitors targeting coronavirus and filovirus entry. Antiviral Res. Apr 2015;116:76–84. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.01.011
    1. Li K, Meyerholz DK, Bartlett JA, McCray PB Jr. The TMPRSS2 Inhibitor Nafamostat Reduces SARS-CoV-2 Pulmonary Infection in Mouse Models of COVID-19. mBio. Aug 31 2021;12(4):e0097021. doi:10.1128/mBio.00970-21
    1. Fitzmaurice GM. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley-Interscience; 2004.
    1. Han A, Poon JL, Powers JH 3rd, Leidy NK, Yu R, Memoli MJ. Using the Influenza Patient-reported Outcome (FLU-PRO) diary to evaluate symptoms of influenza viral infection in a healthy human challenge model. BMC Infect Dis. Jul 28 2018;18(1):353. doi:10.1186/s12879-018-3220-8
    1. Sell SL, Prough DS, Weisz HA, Widen SG, Hellmich HL. Leveraging publicly available coronavirus data to identify new therapeutic targets for COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257965. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257965
    1. Boscolo-Rizzo P, Borsetto D, Fabbris C, et al. Evolution of Altered Sense of Smell or Taste in Patients With Mildly Symptomatic COVID-19. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug 1 2020;146(8):729–732. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1379
    1. Watanabe A, Chang SC, Kim MJ, Chu DW, Ohashi Y, Group MS. Long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor laninamivir octanoate versus oseltamivir for treatment of influenza: A double-blind, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. Nov 15 2010;51(10):1167–75. doi:10.1086/656802
    1. Hayden FG, Treanor JJ, Fritz RS, et al. Use of the oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in experimental human influenza: randomized controlled trials for prevention and treatment. JAMA. Oct 6 1999;282(13):1240–6. doi:10.1001/jama.282.13.1240
    1. Bardsley-Elliot A, Noble S. Oseltamivir. Drugs. Nov 1999;58(5):851–60; discussion 861–2. doi:10.2165/00003495-199958050-00007
    1. Motoo Y. Antiproteases in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. JOP. Jul 9 2007;8(4 Suppl):533–7.
    1. Kono K, Takahashi A, Sugai H, et al. Oral trypsin inhibitor can improve reflux esophagitis after distal gastrectomy concomitant with decreased trypsin activity. Am J Surg. Sep 2005;190(3):412–7. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.044

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera