Enhancing uptake of influenza maternal vaccine

Mallory K Ellingson, Matthew Z Dudley, Rupali J Limaye, Daniel A Salmon, Sean T O'Leary, Saad B Omer, Mallory K Ellingson, Matthew Z Dudley, Rupali J Limaye, Daniel A Salmon, Sean T O'Leary, Saad B Omer

Abstract

Introduction: Influenza vaccination during pregnancy can offer many benefits to both mother and infant. Despite recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, vaccine coverage rates among pregnant women during pregnancy are below 40% in the United States. There is a need for a greater understanding of what interventions can improve vaccine uptake among pregnant women.

Areas covered: This review synthesizes the existing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to improve maternal influenza vaccine uptake. These interventions are examined within the framework of the three psychological propositions: thoughts and feelings, social processes and changing behavior directly.

Expert commentary: A number of promising and effective interventions were identified in this review. Nudge-based interventions that build on favorable intentions to vaccinate such as provider prompts and standing orders have demonstrated significant success in improving influenza vaccine uptake. However, substantial gaps in the literature still exist. Provider recommendations are the most important predictor of vaccine receipt among pregnant women, yet few studies evaluated intervening to improve the dialogue between patient and provider. With the potential for even more vaccines to be added to the maternal immunization schedule, it is vitally important to understand how to improve uptake.

Keywords: Influenza; interventions; maternal immunization; pregnancy; vaccination; vaccine.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest

No conflicts of interest for any of the authors except Dr. Daniel Salmon who received research support and/or consulting funds from Crucell, Pfizer, Walgreens and/or Merck. Dr. Salmon received additional travel funds and honorarium from the National Foundation of Infectious Diseases (NFID).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Systematic Review Results

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera