Comparison of short-term effects of mobilization with movement and Kinesiotaping on pain, function and balance in patellofemoral pain

Serdar Demirci, Gizem Irem Kinikli, Michael J Callaghan, Volga Bayrakci Tunay, Serdar Demirci, Gizem Irem Kinikli, Michael J Callaghan, Volga Bayrakci Tunay

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term effects of Mobilization with movement (MWM) and Kinesiotaping (KT) on patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) respect to pain, function and balance.

Methods: Thirty-five female patients diagnosed with unilateral PFP were assigned into 2 groups. The first group (n = 18) received two techniques of MWM intervention (Straight Leg-Raise with Traction and Tibial Gliding) while KT was applied to the other group (n = 17). Both groups received 4 sessions of treatment twice a week for a period of 2 weeks with a 6-week-home exercise program. Pain severity, knee range of motion, hamstring flexibility, and physical performance (10-step stair climbing test, timed up and go test), Kujala Patellofemoral Pain Scoring and Y-Balance test were assessed. These outcomes were evaluated before the treatment, 45 min after the initial treatment, at the end of the 4-session-treatment during 2-week period and 6 weeks later in both groups.

Results: Both treatment groups had statistically significant improvements on pain, function and balance (p < 0.05). Pain at rest (p = 0.008) and the hamstring muscle flexibility (p = 0.027) were demonstrated significant improvements in favor of MWM group.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated similar results for both treatment techniques in terms of pain, function and balance. The MWM technique with exercise had a short-term favorable effect on pain at rest and hamstring muscle flexibility than the KT technique with exercise in patients with PFP.

Level of evidence: Level I, therapeutic study.

Keywords: Manual therapy; Mulligan's mobilization; Patellofemoral pain; Taping.

Copyright © 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study process. (MWM, Mobilization with movement; KT, Kinesiotaping).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Straight leg-raise with traction.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a) MWM during active knee flexion and extension. b) MWM in weight bearing position.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Self-applied MWM home exercise.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kinesiotaping application.

References

    1. Roush J.R., Curtis Bay R. Prevalence of anterior knee pain in 18-35 year-old females. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(4):396–401.
    1. Werner S. Anterior knee pain: an update of physical therapy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2286–2294.
    1. Boling M., Padua D., Marshall S., Guskiewicz K., Pyne S., Beutler A. Gender differences in the incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(5):725–730.
    1. Fulkerson J.P. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):447–456.
    1. Sanchis-Alfonso V. Springer-Verlag London Limited; 2011. Anterior Knee Pain and Patellar Instability.
    1. Warden S.J., Hinman R.S., Watson M.A., Avin K.G., Bialocerkowski A.E., Crossley K.M. Patellar taping and bracing for the treatment of chronic knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(1):73–83.
    1. Crossley K., Bennell K., Green S., Cowan S., McConnell J. Physical therapy for patellofemoral pain a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(6):857–865.
    1. Hryvniak D., Magrum E., Wilder R. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: an update. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2014;2(1):16–24.
    1. Collado H., Fredericson M. Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin Sports Med. 2010;29(3):379–398.
    1. Kettunen J.A., Harilainen A., Sandelin J. Knee arthroscopy and exercise versus exercise only for chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. BioMedCentral Med. 2007;5(1):1–8.
    1. Petersen W., Ellermann A., Gösele-Koppenburg A. Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2264–2274.
    1. Halabchi F., Mazaheri R., Seif-Barghi T. Patellofemoral pain syndrome and modifiable intrinsic risk factors; how to assess and address? Asian J Sports Med. 2013;4(2):85–100.
    1. LaBella C. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: evaluation and treatment. Prim Care Clin Off Pract. 2004;31(4):977–1003.
    1. Kase K., Wallis J., Kase T. Ken'i-kai information; Tokyo: 2003. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Methods.
    1. Tunay V.B., Akyüz A., Önal S. Patellofemoral ağrı sendromunda kinezyo ve McConnell patellar bantlama tekniklerinin performans üzerine anlık etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Fiz Rehabil. 2008;19(3):104–109.
    1. Akbas E., Atay A.O., Yuksel I. The effects of additional kinesio taping over exercise in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(5):335–341.
    1. Aminaka N., Gribble P.A. A systematic review of the effects of therapeutic taping on patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Athl Train. 2005;40(4):341–351.
    1. Aytar A., Ozunlu N., Surenkok O., Baltacı G., Oztop P., Karatas M. Initial effects of kinesio® taping in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized, double-blind study. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2011;19(2):135–142.
    1. Campolo M., Babu J., Dmochowska K., Scariah S., Varughese J. A comparison of two taping techniques (kinesio and mcconnell) and their effect on anterior knee pain during functional activities. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(2):105–110.
    1. Kuru T., Yaliman A., Dereli E.E. Comparison of efficiency of Kinesio® taping and electrical stimulation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(5):385–392.
    1. Wilson E. The Mulligan concept: NAGS, SNAGS and mobilizations with movement. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2001;5(2):81–89.
    1. Mulligan B.R. 5th ed. Plane View Services Ltd; New Zealand: 2004. Manual Therapy: “nags”, “snags”, “mwms” Etc.
    1. Takasaki H., Hall T., Jull G. Immediate and short-term effects of Mulligan's mobilization with movement on knee pain and disability associated with knee osteoarthritis-A prospective case series. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013;29(2):87–95.
    1. Vicenzino B., Paungmali A., Teys P. Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: current concepts from a critical review of literature. Man Ther. 2007;12(2):98–108.
    1. Teys P., Bisset L., Vicenzino B. The initial effects of a Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique on range of movement and pressure pain threshold in pain-limited shoulders. Man Ther. 2008;13(1):37–42.
    1. Gopal Nambi S., Shah B.T. Kinesio taping versus Mulligan's mobilization with movement in sub-acute lateral ankle sprain in secondary school Hockey players-comparative study. Int J Pharm Sci Health Care. 2012;2(2):136–149.
    1. Hall T., Cacho A., McNee C., Riches J., Walsh J. Effects of the Mulligan traction straight leg raise technique on range of movement. J Man Manip Ther. 2001;9(3):128–133.
    1. Djordjevic O.C., Vukicevic D., Katunac L., Jovic S. Mobilization with movement and kinesiotaping compared with a supervised exercise program for painful shoulder: results of a clinical trial. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2012;35(6):454–463.
    1. Collins N., Teys P., Vicenzino B. The initial effects of a Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique on dorsiflexion and pain in subacute ankle sprains. Man Ther. 2004;9(2):77–82.
    1. Beselga C., Neto F., Alburquerque-Sendín F., Hall T., Oliveira-Campelo N. Immediate effects of hip mobilization with movement in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial. Man Ther. 2016;22(4):80–85.
    1. Crossley K.M., Bennell K.L., Cowan S.M., Green S. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):815–822.
    1. Kuru T., Dereli E.E., Yaliman A. Validity of the Turkish version of the Kujala patellofemoral score in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2004;44(2):152–156.
    1. Kujala U.M., Jaakkola L.H., Koskinen S.K., Taimela S., Hurme M., Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1993;9(2):159–163.
    1. Wall J.C., Bell C., Campbell S., Davis J. The timed get-up-and-go test revisited: measurement of the component tasks. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(1):109–113.
    1. Kinzey S.J., Armstrong C.W. The reliability of the star-excursion test in assessing dynamic balance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(5):356–360.
    1. Gribble P.A., Hertel J. Considerations for normalizing measures of the star excursion balance test. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2003;7(2):89–100.
    1. Mulligan B. 6th ed. Plane View Services Ltd.; Wellington, New Zealand: 2006. NAGS, SNAGS, MWM etc.
    1. Dimitrova E. Efficacy of mobilizations with movement in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Sport Med J. 2008;16(4):16.
    1. Malgaonkar P.P., Sai Kumar N., Vinod Babu K., Rizvi S.R. Short term effect of Mulligan's mobilization versus Kinesio Taping on knee pain and disability for osteoarthritis of knee. Int J Physiother. 2014;1(4):233–240.
    1. White L.C., Dolphin P., Dixon J. Hamstring length in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Physiotherapy. 2009;95(1):24–28.
    1. Miller J., Westrick R., Diebal A., Marks C., Gerber J.P. Immediate effects of lumbopelvic manipulation and lateral gluteal Kinesio Taping on unilateral patellofemoral pain syndrome a pilot study. Sports Health A Multidiscip Approach. 2013;5(3):214–219.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera