Small volume plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome in resource-limited settings: a phase II safety and feasibility study

Badrul Islam, Zhahirul Islam, Shafiqur Rahman, Hubert P Endtz, Margreet C Vos, Mathieu van der Jagt, Peter A van Doorn, Bart C Jacobs, Quazi Deen Mohammad, Badrul Islam, Zhahirul Islam, Shafiqur Rahman, Hubert P Endtz, Margreet C Vos, Mathieu van der Jagt, Peter A van Doorn, Bart C Jacobs, Quazi Deen Mohammad

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and feasibility of small volume plasma exchange (SVPE) for patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).

Design: Non-randomised, single-arm, interventional trial.

Setting: National Institute of Neurosciences and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Participants: Twenty adult (>18 years) patients with GBS presented within 2 weeks of onset of weakness who were unable to walk unaided for more than 10 m.

Interventions: SVPE involves blood cell sedimentation in a blood bag and removal of supernatant plasma after blood cells are retransfused. This procedure was repeated three to six times a day, for eight consecutive days. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and normal saline were used as replacement fluid.

Outcome measures: Serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as severe sepsis and deep venous thrombosis related to the central venous catheter (CVC) used during SVPE. SVPE was considered safe if less than 5/20 patients experienced an SAE, and feasible if 8 L plasma could be removed within 8 days in at least 15/20 patients.

Results: Median patient age 33 years (IQR 23-46; range 18-55); 13 (65%) were male. Median Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score was 20 (IQR 0-29; range 0-36); three (15%) patients required mechanical ventilation. One patient developed SAE (severe sepsis, possibly related to CVC). The median plasma volume exchanged was 140 mL/kg (range 110-175) and removal of 8 L plasma was possible in 15 (75%) patients. Patients received a median 1 g/kg IgG via FFP although a substantial proportion of IgG was probably removed again by the SVPE sessions. GBS disability score improved by at least one grade in 14 (70%) patients 4 weeks after SVPE started. No patients died.

Conclusion: SVPE seems a safe and feasible alternative treatment to standard plasma exchange (PE) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for GBS; further studies of clinical efficacy in low-income and middle-income countries are warranted.

Trial registration number: NCT02780570.

Keywords: Guillain-Barré syndrome; feasibility; safety; small volume plasma exchange.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Feasibility of SVPE and associated complications for the 20 individual patients with GBS. AMeasured in litres. B, central line-associated blood stream infection; C, urinary catheterisation; CVC, central venous catheter; GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; HAI, hospital-acquired infection; M, onset of mechanical ventilation; MRC, Medical Research Council; SVPE: small volume plasma exchange; U, catheter-associated urinary tract infection; V, ventilator-associated pneumonia, , spell of hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg); , CVC insertion site bleeding; , hypersensitivity to fresh frozen plasma, shaded squares: fever due to bacterial infection, dotted squares: fever due to suspected viral infection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hospital-acquired infections and use of antibiotics in the 20 patients with GBS receiving SVPE compared with the 24 hospital control patients without GBS treated in the same ICU and HDU with a CVC who did not receive SVPE. SVPE (n=20): 20 patients with GBS aged ≥18 years old who were bedbound (GBS disability score ≥4) received SVPE within 2 weeks of the onset of weakness. Non-SVPE (n=24): 24 patients aged ≥18 years old with a diagnosis other than GBS who required a CVC for >2 to ≤8 calendar days after admission to the same ICU and HDU units in the same period as the patients with GBS received SVPE. *P<0.0001. CLABSI, central line-associated blood stream infection; CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract infection; CVC, central venous catheter; GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; ICU, intensive care unit; SVPE, small volume plasma exchange; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier estimate (with 95% confidence limits) of the cumulative incidence of restoration of independent walking ability in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome treated with small volume plasma exchange (SVPE).

References

    1. Willison HJ, Jacobs BC, van Doorn PA. Guillain-Barré syndrome. Lancet 2016;388:717–27. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00339-1
    1. Van Koningsveld R, Van Doorn PA, Schmitz PI, et al. . Mild forms of Guillain-Barré syndrome in an epidemiologic survey in The Netherlands. Neurology 2000;54:620–5. 10.1212/WNL.54.3.620
    1. Asbury AK, Arnason BG, Adams RD. The inflammatory lesion in idiopathic polyneuritis. Its role in pathogenesis. Medicine 1969;48:173–215.
    1. Anon. Efficiency of plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome: role of replacement fluids. French Cooperative Group on Plasma Exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Ann Neurol 1987;22:753–61. 10.1002/ana.410220612
    1. Anon. Appropriate number of plasma exchanges in Guillain-Barré syndrome. The French cooperative group on plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Ann Neurol 1997;41:298–306. 10.1002/ana.410410304
    1. Anon. Plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome: one-year follow-up. French Cooperative Group on Plasma Exchange in Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Ann Neurol 1992;32:94–7. 10.1002/ana.410320115
    1. Anon. Plasmapheresis and acute Guillain-Barré syndrome. The Guillain-Barré syndrome Study Group. Neurology 1985;35:1096–104.
    1. Greenwood RJ, Newsom-Davis J, Hughes RA, et al. . Controlled trial of plasma exchange in acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy. Lancet 1984;1:877–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)91341-2
    1. Osterman PO, Fagius J, Lundemo G, et al. . Beneficial effects of plasma exchange in acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy. Lancet 1984;2:1296–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90819-5
    1. Hughes RAC, Swan AV, van Doorn PA. Cochrane Neuromuscular Group. Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barré syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;46.
    1. Chevret S, Hughes RA, Annane D. Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2:CD001798 10.1002/14651858.CD001798.pub3
    1. Hughes RA, Wijdicks EF, Barohn R, et al. . Practice parameter: immunotherapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2003;61:736–40. 10.1212/WNL.61.6.736
    1. van der Meché FG, Schmitz PI. A randomized trial comparing intravenous immune globulin and plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Dutch Guillain-Barré Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1123–9. 10.1056/NEJM199204233261705
    1. Islam MB, Islam Z, Farzana KS, et al. . Guillain-Barré syndrome in Bangladesh: validation of Brighton criteria. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2016;21:345–51. 10.1111/jns.12189
    1. Islam Z, Jacobs BC, van Belkum A, et al. . Axonal variant of Guillain-Barre syndrome associated with Campylobacter infection in Bangladesh. Neurology 2010;74:581–7. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cff735
    1. Ishaque T, Islam MB, Ara G, et al. . High mortality from Guillain-Barré syndrome in Bangladesh. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2017;22:121–6. 10.1111/jns.12215
    1. Islam MB, Islam Z, Rahman S, et al. . Small volume plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome in resource poor settings: a safety and feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017;3:40 10.1186/s40814-017-0185-0
    1. Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barré syndrome. Ann Neurol 1990;27 (suppl):S21–24.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bloodstream infection event (central line-associated bloodstream infection and non-central line associated bloodstream infection. 2018. (accessed 8 Jun 2018).
    1. Hughes RA, Newsom-Davis JM, Perkin GD, et al. . Controlled trial prednisolone in acute polyneuropathy. Lancet 1978;2:750–3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92644-2
    1. Kleyweg RP, van der Meché FG, Schmitz PI. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:1103–9. 10.1002/mus.880141111
    1. Graham RC, Hughes RA. A modified peripheral neuropathy scale: the overall neuropathy limitations scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:973–6. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.081547
    1. van Nes SI, Vanhoutte EK, van Doorn PA, et al. . Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) for immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies. Neurology 2011;76:337–45. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318208824b
    1. Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Colantuoni E, et al. . Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study. BMJ 2010;340:c309 10.1136/bmj.c309
    1. Flodgren G, Conterno LO, Mayhew A, et al. . Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;3:Cd006559 10.1002/14651858.CD006559.pub2
    1. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. . Summary of recommendations: guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:1087–99. 10.1093/cid/cir138
    1. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Urinary Tract Infection (Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [CAUTI] and Non-Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection [UTI]) and Other Urinary System Infection [USI]) Events. 2018.
    1. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Pneumonia (Ventilator-associated [VAP] and non-ventilator-associated Pneumonia [PNEU]) Event. 2018.
    1. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Identifying Healthcare-associated Infections (HAI) for NHSN Surveillance. 2018.
    1. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. CDC/NHSN Surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. 2018.
    1. The Dutch Guillain-Barre Study Group. Treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome with high-dose immune globulins combined with methylprednisolone: a pilot study. Ann Neurol 1994;35:749–52.
    1. Garssen MP, van Koningsveld R, van Doorn PA, et al. . Treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome with mycophenolate mofetil: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:1012–3. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.102731
    1. Stigler SM. The true title of Bayes’s essay. Statistical Science 2013;28:283–8. 10.1214/13-STS438
    1. Freedman LS, Spiegelhalter DJ, Parmar MK. The what, why and how of Bayesian clinical trials monitoring. Stat Med 1994;13:1371–83. 10.1002/sim.4780131312
    1. Resnic FS, Zou KH, Do DV, et al. . Exploration of a bayesian updating methodology to monitor the safety of interventional cardiovascular procedures. Med Decis Making 2004;24:399–407. 10.1177/0272989X04267012
    1. Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alende R, Gude F, et al. . Serum levels of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) in a general adult population and their relationship with alcohol consumption, smoking and common metabolic abnormalities. Clin Exp Immunol 2008;151:42–50. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03545.x
    1. McKhann GM, Griffin JW, Cornblath DR, et al. . Plasmapheresis and Guillain-Barré syndrome: analysis of prognostic factors and the effect of plasmapheresis. Ann Neurol 1988;23:347–53. 10.1002/ana.410230406
    1. Tharakan J, Jayaprakash PA, Iyer VP. Small volume plasma exchange in Guillain-Barre syndrome: experience in 25 patients. J Assoc Physicians India 1990;38:550–3.
    1. Iyer RR, Shah PH, Roy SS, et al. . Reducing the economic burden in management of Guillain-Barre syndrome using modified plasmapheresis. Asian J Transfus Sci 2016;10:118–21. 10.4103/0973-6247.187940
    1. Izak M, Bussel JB. Management of thrombocytopenia. F1000Prime Rep 2014;6 10.12703/P6-45

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera