Accuracy and Precision of Three-Dimensional Low Dose CT Compared to Standard RSA in Acetabular Cups: An Experimental Study

Cyrus Brodén, Henrik Olivecrona, Gerald Q Maguire Jr, Marilyn E Noz, Michael P Zeleznik, Olof Sköldenberg, Cyrus Brodén, Henrik Olivecrona, Gerald Q Maguire Jr, Marilyn E Noz, Michael P Zeleznik, Olof Sköldenberg

Abstract

Background and Purpose. The gold standard for detection of implant wear and migration is currently radiostereometry (RSA). The purpose of this study is to compare a three-dimensional computed tomography technique (3D CT) to standard RSA as an alternative technique for measuring migration of acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. With tantalum beads, we marked one cemented and one uncemented cup and mounted these on a similarly marked pelvic model. A comparison was made between 3D CT and standard RSA for measuring migration. Twelve repeated stereoradiographs and CT scans with double examinations in each position and gradual migration of the implants were made. Precision and accuracy of the 3D CT were calculated. Results. The accuracy of the 3D CT ranged between 0.07 and 0.32 mm for translations and 0.21 and 0.82° for rotation. The precision ranged between 0.01 and 0.09 mm for translations and 0.06 and 0.29° for rotations, respectively. For standard RSA, the precision ranged between 0.04 and 0.09 mm for translations and 0.08 and 0.32° for rotations, respectively. There was no significant difference in precision between 3D CT and standard RSA. The effective radiation dose of the 3D CT method, comparable to RSA, was estimated to be 0.33 mSv. Interpretation. Low dose 3D CT is a comparable method to standard RSA in an experimental setting.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pelvic model with jig holding the cemented cup in place for the examinations. The jig allows precise translations in x-, y-, and z-axis by 1.0 mm increments and rotations in 1.0° increments about the x-axis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Volume fusion of the transformed and reference volume. In this experiment the relative movement of the cup is zero. The overlapping pattern between the two examinations indicates that the surface representations are closer than the smallest voxel elements and that visually the precision of this method is good.

References

    1. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, Supplement. 1989;232:1–51.
    1. Kärrholm J., Borssén B., Löwenhielm G., Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4–7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—British Volume. 1994;76(6):912–917.
    1. Ryd L., Albrektsson B. E. J., Carlsson L., et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—British Volume. 1995;77(3):377–383.
    1. Valstar E. R., Gill R., Ryd L., Flivik G., Börlin N., Kärrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthopaedica. 2005;76(4):563–572. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574.
    1. Olivecrona H., Olivecrona L., Weidenhielm L., et al. A new technique for diagnosis of acetabular cup loosening using computed tomography: preliminary experience in 10 patients. Acta Orthopaedica. 2008;79(3):346–353. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015247.
    1. Svedmark P., Lundh F., Németh G., et al. Motion analysis of total cervical disc replacements using computed tomography: preliminary experience with nine patients and a model. Acta Radiologica. 2011;52(10):1128–1137. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110230.
    1. Söderkvist I., Wedin P.-Å. Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. Journal of Biomechanics. 1993;26(12):1473–1477. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90098-Y.
    1. Söderkvist I., Wedin P.-Å. On condition numbers and algorithms for determining a rigid body movement. BIT. 1994;34(3):424–436. doi: 10.1007/BF01935651.
    1. Noz M. E., Maguire G. Q., Jr., Zeleznik M. P., Kramer E. L., Mahmoud F., Crafoord J. A versatile functional-anatomic image fusion method for volume data sets. Journal of Medical Systems. 2001;25(5):297–307. doi: 10.1023/A:1010633123512.
    1. Olivecrona L., Crafoord J., Olivecrona H., et al. Acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using CT and a semiautomated program for volume merging. Acta Radiologica. 2002;43(5):517–527. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2002.430513.x.
    1. Gorniak R. J. T., Kramer E. L., Maguire G. Q., Jr., Noz M. E., Schettino C. J., Zeleznik M. P. Evaluation of a semiautomatic 3D fusion technique applied to molecular imaging and MRI brain/frame volume data sets. Journal of Medical Systems. 2003;27(2):141–156. doi: 10.1023/a:1021860910856.
    1. Ranstam J. Methodological note: accuracy, precision, and validity. Acta Radiologica. 2008;49(1):105–106. doi: 10.1080/02841850701772706.
    1. Sköldenberg O., Eisler T., Stark A., Muren O., Martinez-Carranza N., Ryd L. Measurement of the migration of a focal knee resurfacing implant with radiostereometry. Acta Orthopaedica. 2014;85(1):79–83. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.869654.
    1. Valstar E. R., Vrooman H. A., Toksvig-Larsen S., Ryd L., Nelissen R. G. H. H. Digital automated RSA compared to manually operated RSA. Journal of Biomechanics. 2000;33(12):1593–1599. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00138-x.
    1. AAPM. Report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. 96. College Park, Md, USA: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2008. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT.
    1. Andreo P. Monte Carlo techniques in medical radiation physics. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1991;36(7):861–920. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/36/7/001.
    1. Goldvasser D., Noz M. E., Maguire G. Q., Olivecrona H., Bragdon C. R., Malchau H. A new technique for measuring wear in total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2012;27(9):1636–1640.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.053.
    1. Kärrholm J. Radiostereometric analysis of early implant migration—a valuable tool to ensure proper introduction of new implants. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012;83(6):551–552. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745352.
    1. Pijls B. G., Valstar E. R., Nouta K.-A., et al. Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012;83(6):614–624. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747052.
    1. Bottner F., Su E., Nestor B., Azzis B., Sculco T. P., Bostrom M. Radiostereometric analysis: the hip. HSS Journal. 2005;1(1):94–99. doi: 10.1007/s11420-005-0114-2.
    1. Kaptein B. L., Valstar E. R., Stoel B. C., Rozing P. M., Reiber J. H. C. A new type of model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for solving the occluded marker problem. Journal of Biomechanics. 2005;38(11):2330–2334. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.018.
    1. Baad-Hansen T., Kold S., Kaptein B. L., Søballe K. High-precision measurements of cementless acetabular components using model-based RSA: An Experimental Study. Acta Orthopaedica. 2007;78(4):463–469. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014095.
    1. Stilling M., Kold S., de Raedt S., Andersen N. T., Rahbek O., Soballe K. Superior accuracy of model-based radiostereometricanalysis for measurement of polyethylene wear: a phantom study. Bone and Joint Research. 2012;1(8):180–191. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.18.2000041.
    1. Olivecrona H., Weidenhielm L., Olivecrona L., et al. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2004;75(3):252–260. doi: 10.1080/00016470410001169.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera