Effective induction therapy for anti-SRP associated myositis in childhood: A small case series and review of the literature

E L Binns, E Moraitis, S Maillard, S Tansley, N McHugh, T S Jacques, L R Wedderburn, C Pilkington, S A Yasin, K Nistala, UK Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group (UK and Ireland), Kate Armon, Joe Ellis-Gage, Holly Roper, Vanja Briggs, Joanna Watts, Liza McCann, Ian Roberts, Eileen Baildam, Louise Hanna, Olivia Lloyd, Susan Wadeson, Phil Riley, Ann McGovern, Clive Ryder, Janis Scott, Beverley Thomas, Eslam Al-Abadi, Sue Wyatt, Gillian Jackson, Tania Amin, Mark Wood, Vanessa Van Rooyen, Deborah Burton, Joyce Davidson, Janet Gardner-Medwin, Neil Martin, Sue Ferguson, Liz Waxman, Michael Browne, Mark Friswell, Helen Foster, Alison Swift, Sharmila Jandial, Vicky Stevenson, Debbie Wade, Ethan Sen, Eve Smith, Lisa Qiao, Stuart Watson, Claire Duong, Helen Venning, Rangaraj Satyapal, Elizabeth Stretton, Mary Jordan, Ellen Mosley, Anna Frost, Lindsay Crate, Kishore Warrier, Stefanie Stafford, Lucy Wedderburn, Clarissa Pilkington, Nathan Hasson, Sue Maillard, Elizabeth Halkon, Virginia Brown, Audrey Juggins, Sally Smith, Sian Lunt, Elli Enayat, Hemlata Varsani, Laura Kassoumeri, Laura Beard, Katie Arnold, Yvonne Glackin, Stephanie Simou, Beverley Almeida, Kiran Nistala, Raquel Marques, Claire Deakin, Stefanie Dowle, Charis Papadopoulou, Cerise Johnson-Moore, Emily Robinson, Kevin Murray, John Ioannou, Linda Suffield, Muthana Al-Obaidi, Helen Lee, Sam Leach, Helen Smith, Anne-Marie McMahon, Heather Chisem, Ruth Kingshott, Nick Wilkinson, Emma Inness, Eunice Kendall, David Mayers, Ruth Etherton, Danielle Miller, Kathryn Bailey, Jacqui Clinch, Natalie Fineman, Helen Pluess-Hall, Lindsay Vallance, Louise Akeroyd, Alice Leahy, Amy Collier, Rebecca Cutts, Emma Macleod, Hans De Graaf, Brian Davidson, Sarah Hartfree, Danny Pratt, E L Binns, E Moraitis, S Maillard, S Tansley, N McHugh, T S Jacques, L R Wedderburn, C Pilkington, S A Yasin, K Nistala, UK Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group (UK and Ireland), Kate Armon, Joe Ellis-Gage, Holly Roper, Vanja Briggs, Joanna Watts, Liza McCann, Ian Roberts, Eileen Baildam, Louise Hanna, Olivia Lloyd, Susan Wadeson, Phil Riley, Ann McGovern, Clive Ryder, Janis Scott, Beverley Thomas, Eslam Al-Abadi, Sue Wyatt, Gillian Jackson, Tania Amin, Mark Wood, Vanessa Van Rooyen, Deborah Burton, Joyce Davidson, Janet Gardner-Medwin, Neil Martin, Sue Ferguson, Liz Waxman, Michael Browne, Mark Friswell, Helen Foster, Alison Swift, Sharmila Jandial, Vicky Stevenson, Debbie Wade, Ethan Sen, Eve Smith, Lisa Qiao, Stuart Watson, Claire Duong, Helen Venning, Rangaraj Satyapal, Elizabeth Stretton, Mary Jordan, Ellen Mosley, Anna Frost, Lindsay Crate, Kishore Warrier, Stefanie Stafford, Lucy Wedderburn, Clarissa Pilkington, Nathan Hasson, Sue Maillard, Elizabeth Halkon, Virginia Brown, Audrey Juggins, Sally Smith, Sian Lunt, Elli Enayat, Hemlata Varsani, Laura Kassoumeri, Laura Beard, Katie Arnold, Yvonne Glackin, Stephanie Simou, Beverley Almeida, Kiran Nistala, Raquel Marques, Claire Deakin, Stefanie Dowle, Charis Papadopoulou, Cerise Johnson-Moore, Emily Robinson, Kevin Murray, John Ioannou, Linda Suffield, Muthana Al-Obaidi, Helen Lee, Sam Leach, Helen Smith, Anne-Marie McMahon, Heather Chisem, Ruth Kingshott, Nick Wilkinson, Emma Inness, Eunice Kendall, David Mayers, Ruth Etherton, Danielle Miller, Kathryn Bailey, Jacqui Clinch, Natalie Fineman, Helen Pluess-Hall, Lindsay Vallance, Louise Akeroyd, Alice Leahy, Amy Collier, Rebecca Cutts, Emma Macleod, Hans De Graaf, Brian Davidson, Sarah Hartfree, Danny Pratt

Abstract

Background: Anti-Signal Recognition Particle associated myopathy is a clinically and histopathologically distinct subgroup of Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis, which is under-recognised in children and fails to respond to conventional first line therapies. We present three cases where remission was successfully induced using combination therapy with intensive rehabilitation.

Case presentations: Three new patients are reported. All 3 cases presented with profound, rapid-onset, proximal myopathy and markedly raised CK, but no rash. Histology revealed a destructive myopathy characterized by scattered atrophic and necrotic fibres with little or no inflammatory infiltrate. All 3 patients responded to induction with cyclophosphamide, IVIG and rituximab, in conjunction with intensive physiotherapy and methotrexate as the maintenance agent. Our patients regained near-normal strength (MMT > 70/80), in contrast with the current literature where >50% of cases reported severe residual weakness. A literature search on paediatric anti-SRP myositis was performed to June 2016; PubMed was screened using a combination of the following terms: signal recognition particle, autoantibodies, antibodies, myositis, muscular diseases, skeletal muscle, childhood, paediatric, juvenile. Articles in a foreign language were excluded. Nine case studies were found.

Conclusion: This paper supports the hypothesis that anti-SRP myositis is distinct from other JIIM. It is an important differential to JDM and should be considered where there is severe weakness without rash or if highly elevated muscle enzymes (CK > 10,000 U/l) are found. Early identification is essential to initiate aggressive medical and physical therapy. Greater international collaboration and long-term follow-up data is needed to establish the most effective treatment strategy for this rare group of patients.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients were included following full, informed parental consent and age appropriate assent. The study was approved by the North Yorkshire Multi Centre Research Ethics Committee, Ref: MREC/1/3/22.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Muscle histology of all 3 SRP cases: a-f haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain showing scattered necrotic fibres (arrows) and atrophic fibres (open arrows) across the biopsies. c and f Numerous regenerating fibres (open arrow heads) could also be seen in case 3. g-i there was very little staining for CD3 in case 1 (arrow) and none in case 2 h. Moderate levels of CD3 were seen in case 3 in the endomysial compartment (i, arrows). j-l there was diffuse MHC class 1 up regulation in all 3 cases, but case 3 had higher levels at the sarcolemma and within fibres. m-o MAC C5b9 stained necrotic fibres in all cases (arrows) and also some endomysial capillaries (not shown). p-r there was scattered expression of neonatal myosin in the muscle fibres of case 1 and 2 (p & q, arrows) and expression in numerous fibres in case 3 r. Scale bars: a, b, f, m-o, q and r – 100 μm. c, g-l, p - 250 μm. d and e - 50 μm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of treatment and clinical course for Case 1 (a), Case 2 (b) and Case 3 (c). Line chart of muscle strength (dotted line with circles, Manual muscle testing, MMT, range 0–80, low numbers indicate weakness) and creatine kinase (CK, intermittent line) from diagnosis. Bold arrows indicate treatment with Rituximab. Duration of treatment is represented by horizontal lines above chart. Short vertical lines indicate treatment with high dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). Narrowing of the top horizontal line represents tailing of the oral corticosteroid dose (PO prednisolone)

References

    1. Love LA, Leff RL, Fraser DD, et al. A new approach to the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: myositis-specific antibodies define useful homogeneous patient groups. Medicine (Baltimore) 1991;70:360–374. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199111000-00002.
    1. Miller T, Al-Lozi MT, Lopate G, Pestronk A. Myopathy with antibodies to the signal recognition particle: clinical and pathological features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:420–428. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.4.420.
    1. Dimitri D, Andre C, Roucoules J, Hosseini H, Humbel R, Authier F. Myopathy associated with anti–signal recognition peptide antibodies: clinical heterogeneity contrasts with stereotyped histopathology. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35:389–395. doi: 10.1002/mus.20693.
    1. Hengstman GJ, ter Laak HJ, Vree Egberts WT, et al. Anti-signal recognition particle autoantibodies: marker of a necrotising myopathy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1635. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.052191.
    1. Targoff IN. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: autoantibody update. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2002;4(5):434–441. doi: 10.1007/s11926-002-0089-7.
    1. Targoff IN. Autoantibodies and their significance in Myositis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008;10(4):333–340. doi: 10.1007/s11926-008-0053-2.
    1. Gunawardena H, Betteridge ZE, McHugh NJ. Myositis-specific autoantibodies: their clinical and pathogenic significance in disease expression. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:607–612. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep078.
    1. Rider LG, Shah M, Mamyrova G. The myositis autoantibody phenotypes of the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2013;92(4):223–243. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e31829d08f9.
    1. Suzuki S, Ohta M, Shimizu Y, Hayashi YK, Nishino I. Anti-signal recognition particle Myopathy in the first decade of life. Pediatr Neurol. 2011;45:114–116. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2011.04.009.
    1. Suzuki S, Satoh T, Sato S, et al. Clinical utility of anti-signal recognition particle antibody in the differential diagnosis of myopathies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47(10):1539–1542. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken325.
    1. Momomura M, Miyamae T, Nozawa T, et al. Serum levels of anti-SRP54 antibodies reflect disease activity of necrotizing myopathy in a child treated effectively with combinatorial methylprednisolone pulses and plasma exchanges followed by intravenous cyclophosphamide. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24(3):529–531. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.852852.
    1. Kawabata T, Komaki H, Saito T, et al. A pediatric patient with myopathy associated with antibodies to a signal recognition particle. Brain Dev. 2012;34:877–880. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2012.02.009.
    1. Rouster-Stevens KA, Pachman LM. Autoantibody to signal recognition particle in African American girls with juvenile polymyositis. J Rheumatol. 2014;35(5):927–929.
    1. Rider LG, Miller FW, Targoff IN, et al. A broadened Spectrum of juvenile Myositis: Myositis-specific autoantibodies in children. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(10):1534–1538. doi: 10.1002/art.1780371019.
    1. Luca NJC, Atkinson A, Hawkins C, Feldman BA. Anti-signal recognition particle-positive juvenile Polymyositis successfully treated with Rituximab. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(7):1483–1485. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111592.
    1. Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med. 1975;292:344–347. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197502132920706.
    1. Tansley SL, Betteridge ZE, Simou S, Jacques TS, Pilkington C, Wood M, Warrier K, Wedderburn LR, McHugh NJ. Anti-HMGCR autoantibodies in juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies identify a rare but clinically important subset of patients. J Rheumatol. 2017;44(4):488–492. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160871.
    1. Oddis CV, Reed AM, Aggarwal R, Ascherman DP, Barohn RJ, Feldman BM, Koontz DC, Miller FW, Pryber SL, Rider LG, Rockette HE. Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile Dermatomyositis (dm) and adult Polymyositis (pm)—the rim study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(12):3844.
    1. Pinal-Fernandez I, Parks C, Werner JL, Albayda J, Paik JJ, Danoff SK, Casciola-Rosen L, Christopher-Stine L, Mammen AL. Longitudinal course of disease in a large cohort of myositis patients with autoantibodies recognizing the signal recognition particle. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(2):263–270. doi: 10.1002/acr.22920.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera