A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Writing Committee, Sean P Donahue, Danielle L Chandler, Jonathan M Holmes, Brian W Arthur, Evelyn A Paysse, David K Wallace, David B Petersen, B Michele Melia, Raymond T Kraker, Aaron M Miller, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Writing Committee, Sean P Donahue, Danielle L Chandler, Jonathan M Holmes, Brian W Arthur, Evelyn A Paysse, David K Wallace, David B Petersen, B Michele Melia, Raymond T Kraker, Aaron M Miller
Abstract
Purpose: To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT).
Design: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial.
Participants: One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to 40 prism diopters (PD), and near stereoacuity of at least 400 seconds of arc.
Methods: Random assignment to BLRc or R&R and masked examinations conducted every 6 months after surgery for 3 years.
Main outcome measures: Proportion of participants meeting suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as: (1) exotropia of 10 PD or more at distance or near using simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT); or (2) constant esotropia of 6 PD or more at distance or near using SPCT; (3) loss of 2 octaves or more of stereoacuity from baseline, at any masked examination; or (4) reoperation without meeting any of these criteria.
Results: Cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 46% (43/101) in the BLRc group versus 37% (33/96) in the R&R group (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6% to 23%). Reoperation by 3 years occurred in 9 participants (10%) in the BLRc group (8 of 9 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria) and in 4 participants (5%) in the R&R group (3 of 4 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria; treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 5%; 95% CI, -2% to 13%). Among participants completing the 3-year visit, 29% (25 of 86) in the BLRc group and 17% (13 of 77) in the R&R group underwent reoperation or met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria at 3 years (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 12%; 95% CI, -1% to 25%).
Conclusions: We did not find a statistically significant difference in suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years between children with IXT treated with BLRc compared with those treated with R&R. Based on these findings, we are unable to recommend one surgical approach over the other for childhood IXT.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No conflicting relationships exist for any author.
Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
- Govindan M, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence and types of childhood exotropia: A population-based study. Ophthalmology 2005;112(1):104–8.
- Yamada T, Hatt SR, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Health-related quality of life in parents of children with intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 2011;15:135–9.
- Paysse EA, Steele EA, McCreery KM, et al. Age of the emergence of negative attitudes toward strabismus. J AAPOS 2001;5(6):361–6.
- von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Exodeviations In: Lampert R, Cox K, Burke D, eds. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus. St. Louis CV Mosby, 2002.
- Exotropia Wright K.. In: Wright KW, ed. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. St Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1995.
- Mitchell PR, Parks MM. Concomitant Exodeviations In: Tasman WS, ed. Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000; v. 1.
- Mohney BG, Holmes JM. An office-based scale for assessing control in intermittent exotropia. Strabismus 2006;14(3):147–50.
- Hatt SR, Leske DA, Yamada T, et al. Development and initial validation of quality-of-life questionnaires for intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology 2010;117(1):163–8.e1.
- Leske DA, Holmes JM, Melia M, on behalf of Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Evaluation of the Intermittent Exotropia Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133(4):461–5.
- Leske DA, Hatt SR, Liebermann L, Holmes JM. Lookup Tables Versus Stacked Rasch Analysis in Comparing Pre- and Postintervention Adult Strabismus-20 Data. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2016;5(1):11.
- Farrington CP, Manning G. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk. Stat Med 1990;9(12):1447–54.
- Lee SY, Hyun Kim J, Thacker NM. Augmented bilateral lateral rectus recessions in basic intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS 2007;11(3):266–8.
- Kushner BJ. Selective surgery for intermittent exotropia based on distance/near differences. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116(3):324–8.
- Buck D, Powell CJ, Sloper JJ, et al. Surgical intervention in childhood intermittent exotropia: current practice and clinical outcomes from an observational cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96(10):1291–5.
Source: PubMed