Retrowalking as an adjunct to conventional treatment versus conventional treatment alone on pain and disability in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial

Gauri Arun Gondhalekar, Medha Vasant Deo, Gauri Arun Gondhalekar, Medha Vasant Deo

Abstract

Background: Increased external knee adduction moment during walking alters the joint biomechanics; which causes symptoms in chronic knee osteoarthritis patients.

Aims: To assess additional effects of Retro-walking over conventional treatment on pain and disability in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic knee osteoarthritis.

Materials and methods: Thirty chronic knee osteoarthritis patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Group 'A' (7 men, 8 women) received conventional treatment. Group 'B' (8 men, 7 women) received conventional treatment and Retro-walking. Pain, assessed through visual analogue scale (VAS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were the primary outcomes and knee range of motion (ROM), hip abductor and extensor strength were secondary outcomes; measured pre-intervention, after 1 week and after 3 weeks of intervention.

Results: Two factors analysis of variance for repeated measures was used for all outcomes. At the end of 3 weeks; WOMAC score showed highly significant difference within (P < 0.0001) and significant difference between groups (P = 0.040) also by Time × group interaction (P = 0.024), VAS showed highly significant difference within groups (P < 0.0001). Knee ROM showed significant difference within groups. Hip abductor and extensor strength showed significant difference by Time × group interaction (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Retrowalking is an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in decreasing disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Keywords: Backward-walking; Knee osteoarthritis; Pathomechanics; Retrowalking.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methodology flow chart

References

    1. Kugler LM, Amstrong CW, Moleski B. Comparative analysis of the kinematics and kinetics of forward and backward human locomotion. ISBS. 1988;6:451–64.
    1. Nor AM, Lyn KS. Effects of passive joint mobilization on patients with knee osteoarthritis. Sains Malays. 2011;40:1461–5.
    1. Mündermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP. Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2835–44.
    1. Mahajan A, Verma S, Tandon V. Osteoarthritis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005;53:634–41.
    1. Chen LY, Su FC, Chiang PY. Kinematic and EMG analysis of backward walking on treadmill. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2000;2:825–7.
    1. Cipriani DJ, Armstrong CW, Gaul S. Backward walking at three levels of treadmill inclination: An electromyographic and kinematic analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22:95–102.
    1. Kumar TR, Ashraf M. The effect of backward walking treadmill training on kinematics of the trunk and lower limbs. Serb J Sports Sci. 2009;3:121–7.
    1. Jackson JL, O’Malley PG, Kroenke K. Evaluation of acute knee pain in primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:575–88.
    1. Brotzman BS, Manske RC. Clinical Orthopedic Rehabilitataion: An Evidenced Based Approach. 3rd ed. USA: Elsevier MOSBY; 2011. The arthritic lower extremity; pp. 380–1.
    1. McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): A review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45:453–61.
    1. Yang YR, Yen JG, Wang RY, Yen LL, Lieu FK. Gait outcomes after additional backward walking training in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:264–73.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera