Predictive Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Mortality in a Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Population

Jacob C Jentzer, Courtney Bennett, Brandon M Wiley, Dennis H Murphree, Mark T Keegan, Ognjen Gajic, R Scott Wright, Gregory W Barsness, Jacob C Jentzer, Courtney Bennett, Brandon M Wiley, Dennis H Murphree, Mark T Keegan, Ognjen Gajic, R Scott Wright, Gregory W Barsness

Abstract

Background: Optimal methods of mortality risk stratification in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) remain uncertain. We evaluated the ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to predict mortality in a large cohort of unselected patients in the CICU.

Methods and results: Adult patients admitted to the CICU from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2015, at a single tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed. SOFA scores were calculated daily, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-III and APACHE-IV scores were calculated on CICU day 1. Discrimination of hospital mortality was assessed using area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve values. We included 9961 patients, with a mean age of 67.5±15.2 years; all-cause hospital mortality was 9.0%. Day 1 SOFA score predicted hospital mortality, with an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve value of 0.83; area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve values were similar for the APACHE-III score, and APACHE-IV predicted mortality (P>0.05). Mean and maximum SOFA scores over multiple CICU days had greater discrimination for hospital mortality (P<0.01). Patients with an increasing SOFA score from day 1 and day 2 had higher mortality. Patients with day 1 SOFA score <2 were at low risk of mortality. Increasing tertiles of day 1 SOFA score predicted higher long-term mortality (P<0.001 by log-rank test).

Conclusions: The day 1 SOFA score has good discrimination for short-term mortality in unselected patients in the CICU, which is comparable to APACHE-III and APACHE-IV. Advantages of the SOFA score over APACHE include simplicity, improved discrimination using serial scores, and prediction of long-term mortality.

Keywords: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score; cardiac critical care; cardiac intensive care unit; critical care; intensive cardiac care unit; intensive care unit; mortality; risk prediction.

© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, as a percentage of overall population, hospital survivors, and inpatient deaths. P<0.001 between groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Short‐ and intermediate‐term mortality as a function of day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score tertile. Tertile 1 includes patients with day 1 SOFA score <2, tertile 2 includes patients with day 1 SOFA score of 2 to 3, and tertile 3 includes patients with day 1 SOFA score ≥4. P<0.001 between groups. CICU indicates cardiac intensive care unit.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Short‐term mortality stratified by day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. CICU indicates cardiac intensive care unit.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Short‐term mortality as a function of change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from day 1 to day 2. Patients without a day 2 SOFA score are classified as “left cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) on day 1.” P<0.001 between groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution of day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment organ system subscores in the overall population, hospital survivors, and hospital nonsurvivors (P<0.001 between hospital survivors and hospital nonsurvivors).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for hospital survivors, by day 1 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score tertile. Tertile 1 includes patients with day 1 SOFA score <2, tertile 2 includes patients with day 1 SOFA score of 2 to 3, and tertile 3 includes patients with day 1 SOFA score ≥4. P<0.001 between groups by log‐rank test.

References

    1. Killip T III, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: a two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1967;20:457–464.
    1. Katz JN, Shah BR, Volz EM, Horton JR, Shaw LK, Newby LK, Granger CB, Mark DB, Califf RM, Becker RC. Evolution of the coronary care unit: clinical characteristics and temporal trends in healthcare delivery and outcomes. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:375–381.
    1. Katz JN, Minder M, Olenchock B, Price S, Goldfarb M, Washam JB, Barnett CF, Newby LK, van Diepen S. The genesis, maturation, and future of critical care cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:67–79.
    1. Morrow DA, Fang JC, Fintel DJ, Granger CB, Katz JN, Kushner FG, Kuvin JT, Lopez‐Sendon J, McAreavey D, Nallamothu B, Page RL II, Parrillo JE, Peterson PN, Winkelman C; American Heart Association Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research . Evolution of critical care cardiology: transformation of the cardiovascular intensive care unit and the emerging need for new medical staffing and training models: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126:1408–1428.
    1. Casella G, Cassin M, Chiarella F, Chinaglia A, Conte MR, Fradella G, Lucci D, Maggioni AP, Pirelli S, Scorcu G, Visconti LO; BLITZ‐3 Investigators . Epidemiology and patterns of care of patients admitted to Italian Intensive Cardiac Care units: the BLITZ‐3 registry. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010;11:450–461.
    1. Holland EM, Moss TJ. Acute noncardiovascular illness in the cardiac intensive care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1999–2007.
    1. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP, De Van, Werf F, Avezum A, Goodman SG, Flather MD, Fox KA; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Investigators . Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2345–2353.
    1. Fonarow GC. Clinical risk prediction tools in patients hospitalized with heart failure. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2012;13:e14–e23.
    1. Keegan MT, Gajic O, Afessa B. Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:163–169.
    1. Vincent JL, Moreno R. Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2010;14:207.
    1. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG;on behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis‐Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. The SOFA (Sepsis‐related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–710.
    1. Minne L, Abu‐Hanna A, de Jonge E. Evaluation of SOFA‐based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2008;12:R161.
    1. Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, McGloughlin S, MacIsaac C, Bellomo R, Pilcher DV; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes and Resource Evaluation (CORE) . Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in‐hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2017;317:290–300.
    1. Argyriou G, Vrettou CS, Filippatos G, Sainis G, Nanas S, Routsi C. Comparative evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring systems in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2015;30:752–757.
    1. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Melot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001;286:1754–1758.
    1. Herasevich V, Pickering BW, Dong Y, Peters SG, Gajic O. Informatics infrastructure for syndrome surveillance, decision support, reporting, and modeling of critical illness. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:247–254.
    1. Aakre C, Franco PM, Ferreyra M, Kitson J, Li M, Herasevich V. Prospective validation of a near real‐time EHR‐integrated automated SOFA score calculator. Int J Med Inform. 2017;103:1–6.
    1. Chandra S, Kashyap R, Trillo‐Alvarez CA, Tsapenko M, Yilmaz M, Hanson AC, Pickering BW, Gajic O, Herasevich V. Mapping physicians' admission diagnoses to structured concepts towards fully automatic calculation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000216.
    1. Keegan MT, Gajic O, Afessa B. Comparison of APACHE III, APACHE IV, SAPS 3, and MPM0III and influence of resuscitation status on model performance. Chest. 2012;142:851–858.
    1. Singh B, Singh A, Ahmed A, Wilson GA, Pickering BW, Herasevich V, Gajic O, Li G. Derivation and validation of automated electronic search strategies to extract Charlson comorbidities from electronic medical records. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:817–824.
    1. Rocca WA, Yawn BP, St Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Melton LJ III. History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:1202–1213.
    1. Janssens U, Graf C, Graf J, Radke PW, Konigs B, Koch KC, Lepper W, Vom Dahl J, Hanrath P. Evaluation of the SOFA score: a single‐center experience of a medical intensive care unit in 303 consecutive patients with predominantly cardiovascular disorders: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:1037–1045.
    1. Afessa B, Keegan MT, Gajic O, Hubmayr RD, Peters SG. The influence of missing components of the Acute Physiology Score of APACHE III on the measurement of ICU performance. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1537–1543.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera