Patient safety and minimizing risk with insulin administration - role of insulin degludec

Myint M Aye, Stephen L Atkin, Myint M Aye, Stephen L Atkin

Abstract

Diabetes is a lifelong condition requiring ongoing medical care and patient self-management. Exogenous insulin therapy is essential in type 1 diabetes and becomes a necessity in patients with longstanding type 2 diabetes who fail to achieve optimal control with lifestyle modification, oral agents, and glucagon-like peptide 1-based therapy. One of the risks that hinders insulin use is hypoglycemia. Optimal insulin therapy should therefore minimize the risk of hypoglycemia while improving glycemic control. Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a novel basal insulin that, following subcutaneous injection, assembles into a depot of soluble multihexamer chains. These subsequently release IDeg monomers that are absorbed at a slow and steady rate into the circulation, with the terminal half-life of IDeg being ~25 hours. Thus, it requires only once-daily dosing unlike other basal insulin preparations that often require twice-daily dosing. Despite its long half-life, once-daily IDeg does not cause accumulation of insulin in the circulation after reaching steady state. IDeg once a day will produce a steady-state profile with a lower peak:trough ratio than other basal insulins. In clinical trials, this profile translates into a lower frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with insulin glargine, as well as an ability to allow some flexibility in dose timing without compromising efficacy and safety. Indeed, a study that tested the extremes of dosing intervals of 8 and 40 hours showed no detriment in either glycemic control or hypoglycemic frequency versus insulin glargine given at the same time each day. While extreme flexibility in dose timing is not recommended, these findings are reassuring. This may be particularly beneficial to elderly patients, patients with learning difficulties, or others who have to rely on health-care professionals for their daily insulin injections. Further studies are required to confirm whether this might benefit adherence to treatment, reduce long-term hypoglycemia or reduce diabetes-related complications.

Keywords: basal insulin; diabetes; hypoglycemia; safety.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of insulin degludec. DesB30 human insulin is acylated at the ε-amino group of LysineB29 with hexadecanoic acid via a γ-L-glutamic acid linker. Note: Reproduced from Jonassen I, Havelund S, Hoeg-Jensen T, Steensgaard DB, Wahlund PO, Ribel U. Design of the novel protraction mechanism of insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin. Pharm Res. 2012;29(8):2104–2114. Copyright © 2012, the authors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the hypothesis for the mode of retarded absorption of insulin degludec. Insulin degludec is injected subcutaneously as a zinc phenol formulation containing insulin degludec dihexamers in the T3R3 conformation. Rapid loss of phenol changes the degludec hexamers to T6 configuration and multihexamer chains form. With slow diffusion of zinc, these chains break down into dimers, which quickly dissociate into readily absorbed monomers. Note: Reproduced from Jonassen I, Havelund S, Hoeg-Jensen T, Steensgaard DB, Wahlund PO, Ribel U. Design of the novel protraction mechanism of insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin. Pharm Res. 2012;29(8): 2104–2114. Copyright © 2012, the authors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hypothetical examples of profiles of insulins with various half-lives. Notes: (A) Accumulation from first dose to steady state and (B) perturbations following various types of common dosing errors as indicated by arrows, when introduced at steady-state. When interpreting the effects of double-dosing (bottom row), it is important to note that different pharmacokinetic scales have been used for the rapid-acting and basal insulin curves. Fluctuations in insulin concentration (and therefore glucose-lowering action) are greatest, and dosing errors have the most acute effects, with basal insulin having a shorter half-life (eg, 6 hours) and duration of action. Fluctuations are dampened and dosing errors have less acute effects with insulin formulations having a longer half-life/duration of action. The half-lives for basal insulin shown in the figure correspond approximately to those of neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (6 hours), insulin glargine (12.5 hours), and insulin degludec (25 hours). Reprinted from Endocrine Practice. Heise T, Meneghini LF. Insulin stacking versus therapeutic accumulation: understanding the differences. Endocr Pract. 2013;20(1):75–83. Copyright 2013, with permission from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

References

    1. Jonassen I, Havelund S, Hoeg-Jensen T, Steensgaard DB, Wahlund PO, Ribel U. Design of the novel protraction mechanism of insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin. Pharm Res. 2012;29(8):2104–2114.
    1. Kurtzhals P, Heise T, Strauss HM, et al. Multi-hexamer formation is the underlying mechanism behind the ultra-long glucose-lowering effect of insulin degludec. Diabetes. 2011;60(Suppl 1A):42-LB. (abstract)
    1. Devries JH, Nattrass M, Pieber TR. Refining basal insulin therapy: what have we learned in the age of analogues? Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2007;23(6):441–454.
    1. Heise T, Pieber TR. Towards peakless, reproducible and long-acting insulins. An assessment of the basal analogues based on isoglycaemic clamp studies. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;9(5):648–659.
    1. Ding L, Gysemans C, Mathieu C. β-Cell differentiation and regeneration in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(Suppl 3):98–104.
    1. Fineberg SK. Application of newer concepts in diabetes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1966;14(5):463–471.
    1. National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse (NDIC) Diabetes overview [web page on the Internet] Bethesda, MD: NDIC; 2008. [Accessed January 26, 2014]. NIH Publication No 09–3873. Available from:
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S11–S66.
    1. Polonsky KS, Given BD, Hirsch LJ, et al. Abnormal patterns of insulin secretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(19):1231–1239.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. American Diabetes Association (ADA) European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364–1379.
    1. Garber AJ. Restaging insulin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11(Suppl 5):1–5.
    1. Heise T, Nosek L, Rønn BB, et al. Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53(6):1614–1620.
    1. Simon AC, DeVries JH. The future of basal insulin supplementation. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(Suppl 1):S103–S108.
    1. Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, Schumm-Draeger PM. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study. Diabet Med. 2012;29(5):682–689.
    1. Garber AJ, Cryer PE, Santiago JV, Haymond MW, Pagliara AS, Kipnis DM. The role of adrenergic mechanisms in the substrate and hormonal response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in man. J Clin Invest. 1976;58(1):7–15.
    1. Cryer PE, Davis SN, Shamoon H. Hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1902–1912.
    1. Cryer PE. Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of Type I and Type II diabetes. Diabetologia. 2002;45(7):937–948.
    1. Segel SA, Paramore DS, Cryer PE. Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in advanced type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(3):724–733.
    1. Graveling AJ, Frier BM. Hypoglycaemia: an overview. Prim Care Diabetes. 2009;3(3):131–139.
    1. Frier BM, Fisher M. Impaired hypoglycaemia awareness. In: Frier BM, Fisher M, editors. Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes. Chichester: Wiley; 1999. pp. 111–146.
    1. Goto A, Arah OA, Goto M, Terauchi Y, Noda M. Severe hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis with bias analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f4533.
    1. Briscoe VJ, Davis SN. Hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: physiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clin Diabetes. 2006;24(3):115–121.
    1. Workgroup on Hypoglycemia, American Diabetes Association Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):1245–1249.
    1. Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Frier BM, et al. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration Frequency and predictors of hypoglycaemia in Type 1 and insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: a population-based study. Diabet Med. 2005;22(6):749–755.
    1. Leiter LA, Yale JF, Chiasson JL, Harris SB, Kleinstiver P, Saurio L. Assessment of the impact of fear of hypoglycemic episodes on glycemic and hypoglycemia management. Can J Diabetes. 2005;29(3):186–192.
    1. Tahrani A, Barnett A, Brod M, Rana M, Peyrot M. GAPP2™: Global survey finds three quarters of patients experience hypoglycaemia on insulin analogue causing dose irregularities and increased blood glucose monitoring. Diabetologia. 2012;55(Suppl 1):S98–S99.
    1. Quilliam BJ, Simeone JC, Ozbay AB, Kogut SJ. The incidence and costs of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(10):673–680.
    1. American Diabetes Association Insulin administration. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(90001):106S–107S.
    1. Pickup JC. Management of diabetes mellitus: is the pump mightier than the pen? Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(7):425–433.
    1. Bot M, Pouwer F, de Jonge P, Tack CJ, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn PH, Snoek FJ. Differential associations between depressive symptoms and glycaemic control in outpatients with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30(3):e115–e122.
    1. Roy T, Lloyd CE. Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;142(Suppl):S8–S21.
    1. Katon WJ, Young BA, Russo J, et al. Association of depression with increased risk of severe hypoglycemic episodes in patients with diabetes. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(3):245–250.
    1. Yaffe K, Falvey CM, Hamilton N, et al. Health ABC Study Association between hypoglycemia and dementia in a biracial cohort of older adults with diabetes mellitus. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(14):1300–1306.
    1. Davis TM, Brown SG, Jacobs IG, Bulsara M, Bruce DG, Davis WA. Determinants of severe hypoglycemia complicating type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle diabetes study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(5):2240–2247.
    1. Amiel SA, Dixon T, Mann R, Jameson K. Hypoglycaemia in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2008;25(3):245–254.
    1. Scholtz HE, Pretorius SG, Wessels DH, Becker RH. Pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic variability: assessment of insulin glargine, NPH insulin and insulin ultralente in healthy volunteers using a euglycaemic clamp technique. Diabetologia. 2005;48(10):1988–1995.
    1. Garber AJ. Will the next generation of basal insulins offer clinical advantages? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Oct 4; Epub.
    1. Garber AJ, King AB, Del Prato S, et al. NN1250-3582 (BEGIN BB T2D) Trial Investigators Insulin degludec, an ultra-longacting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes (BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 2): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9825):1498–1507.
    1. Heller S, Buse J, Fisher M, et al. BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 1 Trial Investigators Insulin degludec, an ultra-longacting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 1): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9825):1489–1497.
    1. Ratner RE, Gough SC, Mathieu C, et al. Hypoglycaemia risk with insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in type 2 and type 1 diabetes: a pre-planned meta-analysis of phase 3 trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(2):175–184.
    1. Zinman B, Philis-Tsimikas A, Cariou B, et al. NN1250-3579 (BEGIN Once Long) Trial Investigators Insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 1-year, randomized, treat-to-target trial (BEGIN Once Long) Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2464–2471.
    1. Heise T, Nosek L, Bøttcher SG, Hastrup H, Haahr H. Ultra-long-acting insulin degludec has a flat and stable glucose-lowering effect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(10):944–950.
    1. Heise T, Hövelmann U, Nosek L, Bøttcher S, Granhall C, Haahr H. Insulin degludec has a two-fold longer half-life and a more consistent pharmacokinetic profile than insulin glargine. Diabetes. 2011;60(Suppl 1A):37-LB. (abstract)
    1. Heise T, Nosek L, Coester HV, et al. Steady state is reached within two to three days of once-daily administration of ultra-long-acting insulin degludec. Diabetes. 2012;61(Suppl 1):A259. (abstract)
    1. Heise T, Hermanski L, Nosek L, Feldman A, Rasmussen S, Haahr H. Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady-state conditions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(9):859–864.
    1. Kupčová V, Arold G, Roepstorff C, Højbjerre M, Klim S, Haahr HL. Insulin degludec: pharmacokinetic properties in subjects with hepatic impairment. Clin Drug Investig. 2014;34(2):127–133.
    1. Kiss I, Arold G, Roepstorff C, Bøttcher SG, Klim S, Haahr H. Insulin degludec: pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;53(2):175–183.
    1. Korsatko S, Deller S, Mader JK, et al. Ultra-Long Pharmacokinetic Properties of Insulin Degludec are Comparable in Elderly Subjects and Younger Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Drugs Aging. 2013;31(1):47–53.
    1. Danne T, Bieter T, Blaesig S, et al. Ultra-long pharmacokinetic properties of insulin degludec in adults with type 1 diabetes is preserved in children and adolescents after single-dose administration. Diabetologia. 2011;54(Suppl 1):S425.
    1. Hirsch IB. Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(2):174–183.
    1. DeWitt DE, Hirsch IB. Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: scientific review. JAMA. 2003;289(17):2254–2264.
    1. Heise T, Meneghini LF. Insulin stacking versus therapeutic accumulation: understanding the differences. Endocr Pract. 2013;20(1):75–83.
    1. Meneghini L, Atkin SL, Gough SC, et al. NN1250-3668 (BEGIN FLEX) Trial Investigators The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given in variable once-daily dosing intervals compared with insulin glargine and insulin degludec dosed at the same time daily: a 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):858–864.
    1. Mathieu C, Hollander P, Miranda-Palma B, et al. NN1250-3770 (BEGIN: Flex T1) Trial Investigators Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec in a flexible dosing regimen vs insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes (BEGIN: Flex T1): a 26-week randomized, treat-to-target trial with a 26-week extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):1154–1162.
    1. Onishi Y, Iwamoto Y, Yoo SJ, Clauson P, Tamer SC, Park S. Insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: A 26-week, randomized, controlled, Pan-Asian, treat-to-target trial. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4(6):605–612.
    1. Gough SC, Bhargava A, Jain R, Mersebach H, Rasmussen S, Bergenstal RM. Low-volume insulin degludec 200 units/mL once daily improves glycemic control similarly to insulin glargine with a low risk of hypoglycemia in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26-week, randomized, controlled, multinational, treat-to-target trial: the BEGIN LOW VOLUME trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2536–2542.
    1. Novo Nordisk . [website on the Internet] Bethseda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2008. [Accessed January 26, 2014]. Comparison of NN1250 Versus Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (BEGIN™) [updated September 17, 2013]. Available from: . NLM identifier: NCT00982644.
    1. Novo Nordisk . [website on the Internet] Bethseda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2009. [Accessed January 26, 2014]. Comparison of NN1250 with insulin glargine plus insulin aspart with/without metformin and with/without pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes (BEGIN™) [updated November 14, 2013]. Available from: . NLM identifier: NCT00972283.
    1. Novo Nordisk . [website on the Internet] Bethseda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2009. [Accessed January 26, 2014]. Comparison of NN1250 plus insulin aspart with insulin glargine plus insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (BEGIN™) [updated November 28, 2013]. Available from: . NLM identifier: NCT00982228.
    1. Novo Nordisk . [website on the Internet] Bethseda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2009. [Accessed January 26, 2014]. Comparison of NN1250 with insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes (BEGIN™) [updated November 26, 2013]. Available from: . NLM identifier: NCT01006291.
    1. Novo Nordisk . [website on the Internet] Bethseda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2010. [Accessed January 26, 2014]. Comparison of NN1250 with insulin glargine in type 1 diabetes (BEGIN™) [updated November 20, 2013]. Available from: . NLM identifier: NCT01079234.
    1. Novo Nordisk . [website on the Internet] Bethseda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2010. [Accessed January 26 2014]. Comparison of NN1250 versus insulin glargine in subjects with type 2 diabetes (BEGIN™) [updated November 21, 2013]. Available from: . NLM identifier: NCT01059799.
    1. Novo Nordisk . [website on the Internet] Bethseda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2010. [Accessed January 26, 2014]. Comparison of NN1250 with insulin glargine in subjects with type 2 diabetes (BEGIN™) [updated November 26, 2013]. Available from: . NLM identifier: NCT01068665.
    1. Harris SB, Vora J, Christensen T, Kapur R, Brod M. Duration and impact of hypoglycemic events with insulin degludec and insulin glargine – a meta-analysis. Can J Diabetes. 2013;37(Suppl 4):S54.
    1. Tresiba (degludec) [summary of product characteristics] Bagsværd: Novo Nordisk; 2013. [Accessed January 26, 2014]. Available from: .
    1. Zinman B, DeVries JH, Bode B, et al. NN1250-3724 (BEGIN:EASY AM), NN1250-3718 (BEGIN:EASY PM) Trial Investigators Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec three times a week versus insulin glargine once a day in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: results of two phase 3, 26 week, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1(2):123–131.
    1. Sharpe L. Improving safety of insulin administration: A pilot audit of hospital staff knowledge. J Diabetes Nurs. 2012;16(1):8–16.
    1. Korsatko S, Deller S, Koehler G, et al. A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of 100 and 200 U/mL formulations of ultra-long-acting insulin degludec. Clin Drug Investig. 2013;33(7):515–521.
    1. Chelliah A, Burge MR. Hypoglycaemia in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus: causes and strategies for prevention. Drugs Aging. 2004;21(8):511–530.
    1. Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Incidence and risk factors for serious hypoglycemia in older persons using insulin or sulfonylureas. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(15):1681–1686.
    1. Sorli C, Warren M, Oyer D, Mersebach H, Johansen T, Gough SC. Elderly patients with diabetes experience a lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec than with insulin glargine: a meta-analysis of phase IIIa trials. Drugs Aging. 2013;30(12):1009–1018.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera