Occupational therapy lifestyle intervention added to multidisciplinary treatment for adults living with chronic pain: a feasibility study

Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, Søren T Skou, Anette Enemark Larsen, Romanas Polianskis, Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Jens Søndergaard, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen, Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen, Søren T Skou, Anette Enemark Larsen, Romanas Polianskis, Wojciech Zbigniew Pawlak, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Jens Søndergaard, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention for adults living with chronic pain.

Design: This one-group pre-post interventional study investigated the feasibility and outcomes of the Redesign Your Everyday Activities and Lifestyle with Occupational Therapy (REVEAL(OT)) intervention targeting meaningful activities and lifestyle.

Settings: The occupational therapist-led intervention was added to standard multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment at a Danish pain centre.

Participants: Of the 40 adult participants aged 18-64 (mean 46.6±10.9 years old, 85% females, chronic pain duration ≥3 months), there were 31 completers.

Intervention: Three feasibility rounds were carried out in 2019-2021. The intervention focused on meaningful activities, healthy eating habits and daily physical activity. Methods of didactical presentations, group discussions, personal reflection and experiential learning were used in the intervention composed both of individual and group sessions.

Outcomes: Primary outcomes were predefined research progression criteria evaluated by the red-amber-green method. Secondary outcomes measured pre-post changes in health-related quality of life and occupational performance and satisfaction.

Results: The study demonstrated satisfactory programme adherence (77.5%), patients' self-perceived relevance (97%), timing and mode of delivery (97%) and assessment procedure acceptance (95%). No adverse events causing discontinuation occurred. Recruitment rate (n=5.7 monthly), retention (77.5%) and the fidelity of delivery (83.3%) needed improvement. We observed no improvement in health-related quality of life (mean=0.04, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.12) but positive change in occupational performance (mean=1.80, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.35) and satisfaction (mean=1.95, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.84). The participants reached the minimal clinically important difference for occupational performance (≥3.0 points in 13.8%) and satisfaction (≥3.2 points in 24.0%).

Conclusions: The REVEAL(OT) intervention was feasible to deliver and beneficial for the participants' occupational performance and satisfaction. The interventions' recruitment, retention and delivery strategies need optimisation in a future definitive trial.

Trial registration number: NCT03903900.

Keywords: COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; REHABILITATION MEDICINE.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram. REVEAL(OT), Redesign Your Everyday Activities and Lifestyle with Occupational Therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants’ pre-post trajectories in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L, 5-Level version of EuroQol-5 Dimension). REVEAL(OT), Redesign Your Everyday Activities and Lifestyle with Occupational Therapy.

References

    1. Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD, McGeary CA, et al. . Interdisciplinary chronic pain management: past, present, and future. Am Psychol 2014;69:119. 10.1037/a0035514
    1. Treede R-D, Rief W, Barke A, et al. . A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain 2015;156:1003–7. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160
    1. Nijs J, D'Hondt E, Clarys P, et al. . Lifestyle and chronic pain across the lifespan: an inconvenient truth? Pm R 2020;12:410–9. 10.1002/pmrj.12244
    1. Senba E, Kami K. A new aspect of chronic pain as a lifestyle-related disease. Neurobiol Pain 2017;1:6–15. 10.1016/j.ynpai.2017.04.003
    1. van Hecke O, Torrance N, Smith BH. Chronic pain epidemiology - where do lifestyle factors fit in? Br J Pain 2013;7:209–17. 10.1177/2049463713493264
    1. Nielsen SS, Skou ST, Larsen AE, et al. . Associations of health-related quality of life with sociodemographic characteristics, health, pain, and lifestyle factors, and motivation for changing lifestyle in adults living with chronic pain: a cross-sectional exploratory study. Scand J Pain 2022;22:142-153. 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0062
    1. Clark F, Azen SP, Zemke R, et al. . Occupational therapy for independent-living older adults. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997;278:1321–6.
    1. Jackson J, Carlson M, Mandel D, et al. . Occupation in lifestyle redesign: the well elderly study occupational therapy program. Am J Occup Ther 1998;52:326–36. 10.5014/ajot.52.5.326
    1. Uyeshiro Simon A, Collins CER. Lifestyle Redesign® for Chronic Pain Management: A Retrospective Clinical Efficacy Study. Am J Occup Ther 2017;71:p1–7104190040. 10.5014/ajot.2017.025502
    1. Nielsen SS, Christensen JR. Occupational therapy for adults with overweight and obesity: mapping interventions involving occupational therapists. Occup Ther Int 2018;2018:17. 10.1155/2018/7412686
    1. É L, Masse J, Levasseur M, et al. . Pilot study of French-Canadian lifestyle Redesign® for chronic pain management. OTJR: occupation. Participation and Health 2021;1539449220982908.
    1. É L, Dépelteau A, Masse J. Occupational therapy’s unique contribution to chronic pain management: a scoping review. Pain Res Manag 2018;2018:19.
    1. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. . A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical Research Council guidance. BMJ;2021:n2061.
    1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki . Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191–4.
    1. EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) . Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing directive 95/46/EC (General data protection regulation), OJ 2016 L 119/1.
    1. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, et al. . A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:1. 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. . Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687. 10.1136/bmj.g1687
    1. Wilcock A, Hocking C. .. In: An occupational perspective of health. 3rd ed. SLACK Incorporated, 2015.
    1. Wilcock AA, doing Ron. Being and becoming. Can J Occup Ther 1998;65:248–56.
    1. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. . World Health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:1451. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
    1. Ministry of Food Agriculture and Fisheries of Denmark . The official dietary guidelines – good for health and climate, 2021. Available:
    1. et al. Clark F, Blanchard J, Sleight A, et al., eds. Lifestyle Redesign®: the intervention tested in the USC well elderly studies. Second Edition, 2015.
    1. McColl MA, Law M. Interventions affecting self-care, productivity, and leisure among adults: a scoping review. OTJR 2013;33:110–9. 10.3928/15394492-20130222-01
    1. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, et al. . Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain 2008;137:276–85. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.002
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. . Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005;113:9–19. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
    1. Vaegter HB, Christoffersen LO, Enggaard TP, et al. . Socio-demographics, pain characteristics, quality of life and treatment values before and after specialized interdisciplinary pain treatment: results from the Danish clinical pain registry (PainData). J Pain Res 2021;14:1215–30. 10.2147/JPR.S306504
    1. Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, et al. . Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013537. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537
    1. Food and Drug Administration . What is a serious adverse event? U.S. Food and Drug Administration [updated 9 September 2020]. Available:
    1. Devlin N, Parkin D, Janssen B. Methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D data, 2020. Cham (CH): Springer. Available:
    1. Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, et al. . Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1717–27. 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4
    1. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. . Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727–36. 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
    1. EuroQoL Group . EQ-5D-5L valuation. Crosswalk index value calculator. Available:
    1. Jensen CE, Sørensen SS, Gudex C, et al. . The Danish EQ-5D-5L value set: a hybrid model using cTTO and DCE data. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2021;19:579-591. 10.1007/s40258-021-00639-3
    1. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. . Canadian occupational performance measure (COPM): manual 5.0. Canada: The Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT), 2014.
    1. Carpenter L, Baker GA, Tyldesley B. The use of the Canadian occupational performance measure as an outcome of a pain management program. Can J Occup Ther 2001;68:16–22. 10.1177/000841740106800102
    1. Billingham SAM, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom clinical research network database. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:104. 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104
    1. Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res 2011;45:626–9. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008
    1. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Statist 2005;4:287–91.
    1. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2004;10:307–12. 10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x
    1. Enemark Larsen A, Jessen Winge C, Christensen JR. Clinical utility of the Danish version of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Scand J Occup Ther 2021;28:239-250. 10.1080/11038128.2019.1634150
    1. Tuntland H, Aaslund MK, Langeland E, et al. . Psychometric properties of the Canadian occupational performance measure in home-dwelling older adults. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016;9:411–23. 10.2147/JMDH.S113727
    1. Nielsen SS, Christensen JR, Søndergaard J, et al. . Feasibility assessment of an occupational therapy lifestyle intervention added to multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment at a Danish pain centre: a qualitative evaluation from the perspectives of patients and clinicians. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2021;16:1949900. 10.1080/17482631.2021.1949900
    1. Whyte J, Hart T. It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:639–52. 10.1097/01.PHM.0000078200.61840.2D
    1. Treweek S. Addressing issues in recruitment and retention using feasibility and pilot trials. In: Richards DA, Hallberg IR, eds. Complex interventions in health. New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.
    1. Groenwold RHH, Dekkers OM. Missing data: the impact of what is not there. Eur J Endocrinol 2020;183:E7–9. 10.1530/EJE-20-0732
    1. Kang H. The prevention and handling of the missing data. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013;64:402–6. 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.5.402
    1. Heather N, Hönekopp J. A revised edition of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire [Treatment Version]. Addiction Res Theory 2009;16:421–33.
    1. Hannöver W, Thyrian JR, Hapke U, et al. . The readiness to change questionnaire in subjects with hazardous alcohol consumption, alcohol misuse and dependence in a general population survey. Alcohol Alcohol 2002;37:362–9. 10.1093/alcalc/37.4.362
    1. Denk F, McMahon SB, Tracey I. Pain vulnerability: a neurobiological perspective. Nat Neurosci 2014;17:192–200. 10.1038/nn.3628
    1. Soriano J, Monsalve V, Gómez-Carretero P, et al. . Vulnerable personality profile in patients with chronic pain: relationship with coping, quality of life and adaptation to disease. Int J Psychol Res 2012;5:42–51.
    1. Clauw DJ, Häuser W, Cohen SP, et al. . Considering the potential for an increase in chronic pain after the COVID-19 pandemic. Pain 2020;161:1694–7. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001950
    1. Piraccini E, Byrne H, Taddei S. Chronic pain management in COVID-19 era. J Clin Anesth 2020;65:109852. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109852
    1. Ó R-N, Leirós-Rodríguez R, Benítez-Andrades JA, et al. . Musculoskeletal pain and Teleworking in times of the COVID-19: analysis of the impact on the workers at two Spanish universities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18.
    1. Ashley F. Accounting for research fatigue in research ethics. Bioethics 2021;35:270–6. 10.1111/bioe.12829
    1. Toomey E, Hardeman W, Hankonen N, et al. . Focusing on fidelity: narrative review and recommendations for improving intervention fidelity within trials of health behaviour change interventions. Health Psychol Behav Med 2020;8:132–51. 10.1080/21642850.2020.1738935
    1. Campbell BK, Buti A, Fussell HE, et al. . Therapist predictors of treatment delivery fidelity in a community-based trial of 12-step facilitation. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2013;39:304-11. 10.3109/00952990.2013.799175
    1. Grimshaw J, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. . Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2000;39.
    1. The Danish Health Authority . Coverage of the pain area. Professional proposal for a pain action plan [Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2020. Afdaekning af smerteområdet. Fagligt oplaeg til en smertehandlingsplan]. The Danish Health Authority [Sundhedsstyrelsen]. Available: [Accessed 01 Dec 2020].
    1. International association for the study of pain. IASP curriculum outline on pain for occupational therapy. International Association for the Study of Pain 2018.
    1. Nilsen M, Drusedum D, Wenger S, et al. . Addressing chronic pain vulnerability with interprofessional care and retrospective reflections from art and physical therapists on interprofessional education: a dual case study. J Interprof Educ Pract 2020;20:100331.
    1. Hill W. The role of occupational therapy in pain management. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 2016;17:451–3.
    1. Hesselstrand M, Samuelsson K, Liedberg G. Occupational Therapy Interventions in Chronic Pain--A Systematic Review. Occup Ther Int 2015;22:183–94. 10.1002/oti.1396
    1. Robinson K, Kennedy N, Harmon D. Review of occupational therapy for people with chronic pain. Aust Occup Ther J 2011;58:74–81. 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00889.x
    1. Dean E, Söderlund A. What is the role of lifestyle behaviour change associated with non-communicable disease risk in managing musculoskeletal health conditions with special reference to chronic pain? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16:87. 10.1186/s12891-015-0545-y
    1. Okifuji A, Hare BD. The association between chronic pain and obesity. J Pain Res 2015;8:399–408. 10.2147/JPR.S55598
    1. Andersson HI. Increased mortality among individuals with chronic widespread pain relates to lifestyle factors: a prospective population-based study. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1980–7. 10.3109/09638280902874154
    1. Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, et al. . Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology 2008;47:670–8. 10.1093/rheumatology/ken021
    1. Hróbjartsson A, Thomsen ASS, Emanuelsson F, et al. . Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. BMJ 2012;344:e1119. 10.1136/bmj.e1119
    1. Smart A. A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:377–8. 10.1093/intqhc/mzl034

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera