Remaining unconscious: The burden of traumatic brain injuries in India

Deepak Agrawal, P K Singh, S Sinha, D K Gupta, G D Satyarthee, M C Misra, Deepak Agrawal, P K Singh, S Sinha, D K Gupta, G D Satyarthee, M C Misra

Abstract

Introduction: It is well-known that severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI) have a poor outcome. However, what is not well-known is the outcome for those who survive but remain unconscious at the time of discharge from the hospital.

Aims and objectives: To assess the outcome of severe TBI patients who have a motor response of M5 or lower on the Glasgow coma score (GCS) at discharge from a single centre in India.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study carried at one trauma centre in India, a prospectively maintained neurotrauma registry was queried from May 2010 to February 2013 for patients who had severe traumatic brain injury (GCS ≤ 8) at admission and had a motor response of M5 or lower on the GCS at discharge. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed, and outcome Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) assessed at 6 months using a telephonic questionnaire.

Observations and results: There were a total of 1525 patients with severe TBI in the study period. Of these 166 (10.9%) were unconscious (motor response M5 or lower on the GCS) at discharge from the hospital. 139 were males and 27 females with a mean age of 33.9 years. After a mean hospital stay of 24.31 days, the discharge motor score was M5 in 32 (19.3%), M4 in 44 (26.5%), M3 in 59 (35.5%), M2 in 44 (26.5%), and M1 in 9 (5.4%). Telephonic follow-up was available in 102 (61.4%) of the patients. 54 (52.9%) patients had died and 32 (31.4%) remained unconscious (vegetative) at 6 months. Only 16 patients (15.7%) had a good outcome (GOS 1-2) at 6 months following an injury.

Conclusions: This is the only study of its kind on patients who remain unconscious at discharge following severe TBI and reveals that around 50% will die and another 30% remains vegetative at 6 months of discharge. Only a small percentage (15% in our study) will become conscious and partially integrated in the society.

Keywords: Head injury; mortality; outcome; severe traumatic brain injuries; unconscious; vegetative.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349:1436–42.
    1. Rajendra PB, Mathew TP, Agrawal A, Sabharawal G. Characteristics of associated craniofacial trauma in patients with head injuries: An experience with 100 cases. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2009;2:89–94.
    1. De Silva MJ, Roberts I, Perel P, Edwards P, Kenward MG, Fernandes J, et al. Patient outcome after traumatic brain injury in high-, middle- and low-income countries: Analysis of data on 8927 patients in 46 countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:452–8.
    1. Fleminger S, Ponsford J. Long term outcome after traumatic brain injury. BMJ. 2005;331:1419–20.
    1. Bruns J, Jr, Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: A review. Epilepsia. 2003;44(Suppl 10):2–10.
    1. Gururaj G. Road traffic deaths, injuries and disabilities in India: Current scenario. Natl Med J India. 2008;21:14–20.
    1. Dandona R, Kumar GA, Ameer MA, Ahmed GM, Dandona L. Incidence and burden of road traffic injuries in urban India. Inj Prev. 2008;14:354–9.
    1. Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet. 1972;1:734–7.
    1. Laureys S, Boly M. The changing spectrum of coma. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:544–6.
    1. Laureys S, Owen AM, Schiff ND. Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:537–46.
    1. The vegetative state: Guidance on diagnosis and management. Clin Med. 2003;3:249–54.
    1. Kagan RJ, Baker RJ. The impact of the volume of neurotrauma experience on mortality after head injury. Am Surg. 1994;60:394–400.
    1. Fakhry SM, Trask AL, Waller MA, Watts DD. IRTC Neurotrauma Task Force. Management of brain-injured patients by an evidence-based medicine protocol improves outcomes and decreases hospital charges. J Trauma. 2004;56:492–9.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera