Transcriptional induction of the heat shock protein B8 mediates the clearance of misfolded proteins responsible for motor neuron diseases

Valeria Crippa, Vito G D'Agostino, Riccardo Cristofani, Paola Rusmini, Maria E Cicardi, Elio Messi, Rosa Loffredo, Michael Pancher, Margherita Piccolella, Mariarita Galbiati, Marco Meroni, Cristina Cereda, Serena Carra, Alessandro Provenzani, Angelo Poletti, Valeria Crippa, Vito G D'Agostino, Riccardo Cristofani, Paola Rusmini, Maria E Cicardi, Elio Messi, Rosa Loffredo, Michael Pancher, Margherita Piccolella, Mariarita Galbiati, Marco Meroni, Cristina Cereda, Serena Carra, Alessandro Provenzani, Angelo Poletti

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are often associated with the presence of misfolded protein inclusions. The chaperone HSPB8 is upregulated in mice, the human brain and muscle structures affected during NDs progression. HSPB8 exerts a potent pro-degradative activity on several misfolded proteins responsible for familial NDs forms. Here, we demonstrated that HSPB8 also counteracts accumulation of aberrantly localized misfolded forms of TDP-43 and its 25 KDa fragment involved in most sporadic cases of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (sALS) and of Fronto Lateral Temporal Dementia (FLTD). HSPB8 acts with BAG3 and the HSP70/HSC70-CHIP complex enhancing the autophagic removal of misfolded proteins. We performed a high-through put screening (HTS) to find small molecules capable of inducing HSPB8 in neurons for therapeutic purposes. We identified two compounds, colchicine and doxorubicin, that robustly up-regulated HSPB8 expression. Both colchicine and doxorubicin increased the expression of the master regulator of autophagy TFEB, the autophagy linker p62/SQSTM1 and the autophagosome component LC3. In line, both drugs counteracted the accumulation of TDP-43 and TDP-25 misfolded species responsible for motoneuronal death in sALS. Thus, analogs of colchicine and doxorubicin able to induce HSPB8 and with better safety and tolerability may result beneficial in NDs models.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1. HSPB8 enhances the clearance of…
Figure 1. HSPB8 enhances the clearance of TDP-43 and TDP-25 (A,B) Immunofluorescence microscopy analysis (63x magnification and 2.5x zoom) of mouse motoneuronal NSC34 cells transiently overexpressing GFP-TDP-43 or GFP-TDP-25 plasmids.
Cells were stained for the endogenous autophagic markers p62/SQSTM1 (A) and LC3 (B). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. (C) Immunofluorescence analysis of NSC34 cells transiently overexpressing GFP-TDP-43 or GFP-TDP-25 and pCDNA3 or hHSPB8. Where indicated, cells were treated with 10 mM 3-methyladenine (3-MA) for the last 48 hrs prior to fixation. DAPI: nuclei staining. RED: human transfected HSPB8. (D) Representative Filter Retardation Assay (FRA) and FRA quantification (left insets), and Western Blot (WB; right insets) of the PBS extracts of NSC34 cells transiently overexpressing the GFP-TDP-43 or GFP-TDP-25 and pCDNA3 or hHSPB8 plasmids. The histogram represents densitometric analysis of three independent replicates for each sample (**p < 0.01 vs GFP-TDP-43; °°p < 0.01 vs GFP-TDP-25).
Figure 2. Development of the cellular system…
Figure 2. Development of the cellular system for the screening of the HSPB8 promoter modulators (A) Validation of the GFP-hPromB8LUC plasmid.
NSC34 cells were transiently transfected with GFP-hPromB8LUC and pRL-TK plasmids. 24 hrs after transfection, cells were treated with DMSO or 10 μM MG132 for the last 16 hrs prior to luminescence analysis. The histogram represents the Luminescence Counts Per Second (LCPS) of the inducible firefly luciferase normalized by the LCPS of renilla luciferase of six independent replicates (**p B) Clones selection of NSC34-GFP-hPromB8LUC (#Ns) stably transfected cells. Different #Ns clones were analysed for their luminescence levels, 48 hrs after plating. NSC34 untransfected cells were used as negative control. The histogram represents the firefly luciferase LCPS mean normalized by the total protein level mean of six independent replicates for each clone (**p < 0.01 vs NSC34 untransfected cells). (C) Optimization of cell number and signal to background ratio for HTS assay. Raw data of relative luminescence units detected by NSC34 clones after 24 hrs seeding at the indicated cell number. SD refers to two independent experiments. (D) Validation of the #N4 selected clone. NSC34-GFP-hPromB8LUC #N4 cells were analysed for their ability to respond to MG132 treatment. 24 hrs after plating, cells were treated with DMSO or 10 μM MG132 for the last 16 hrs prior to luminescence analysis. The histogram represents the firefly inducible luciferase LCPS mean normalized by the total protein level mean of six independent replicates (**p < 0.01 vs DMSO).
Figure 3. Primary screening parameters and ranking…
Figure 3. Primary screening parameters and ranking of the 2,000 library compounds.
(A) Distribution of positive (MG132) and negative (DMSO) controls according to firefly units normalized to GFP signal. #N4 cells were treated with 5 μM of MG132 or DMSO for 24 hrs in two columns (1–2 and 23-24, respectively) of each 384-well plate ran (n = 25). (B) Parameters calculated from positive and negative controls validating robustness of the screening. (C) Distribution of GFP signals relative to each compound tested; values near to 100% indicate un-perturbing activity of compound on cellular or GFP-associated metabolism. (D) Plot of compounds ranked according to progressive Z score values (compounds are listed in Supplementary Table 2). (E) Chemical ontology (SODIAC) annotation according to the recognized bioactivity of HSPB8 activating compounds. *indicates less than 1% over-representation; NC = non classified.
Figure 4. Counterscreening of 18 hits by…
Figure 4. Counterscreening of 18 hits by dose-response effects.
(A,B) NSC34 #N4 cells were treated for 24 hrs with four doses of indicated compounds. Relative cytotoxic activity was evaluated by Alamar blue assay following manufacture’s instruction. (C,D) Relative luminescence units detected in cells treated as in (A,B), normalized to cell viability (n = 2).
Figure 5. Hits validation on endogenous HSPB8…
Figure 5. Hits validation on endogenous HSPB8 expression in human neuronal cells (A) Q-PCR analysis of HSPB8 mRNA levels performed on SH-SY5Y cells.
24 hrs after plating, cells were treated for the last 24 hrs prior to extraction with 1 μM of different compounds or with DMSO (negative control) or 10 μM MG132 (positive control). HSPB8 mRNA levels were normalized with RplP0 mRNA levels (relative levels); histogram represents the analysis of 4 independent replicates (**p B–E) Dose-dependent response analysis of colchicine (B,C) and doxorubicin (D,E) treatments performed on SH-SY5Y cells treated with 100 nM, 500 nM or 1 μM of colchicine or doxorubicin, and with DMSO or 10 μM MG132 for 24 hrs. (B,D) Q-PCR analyses of HSPB8 mRNA levels. The histograms represent the HSPB8 mRNA relative levels mean of 4 independent replicates (*p < 0.05 vs DMSO; **p < 0.01 vs DMSO). (C,E) WB and WB quantification of HSPB8 protein levels. The histograms represent densitometric analysis of three independent replicates for each sample (*p < 0.05 vs DMSO; **p < 0.01 vs DMSO).
Figure 6. Analysis of the heat shock…
Figure 6. Analysis of the heat shock response after colchicine and doxorubicin treatments (A–F) Q-PCR analyses of HSF1 (A,B), BAG3 (C,D) and BAG1 (E,F) mRNA levels performed on SH-SY5Y cells treated for the last 24 hrs prior to extraction with 100 nM, 500 nM or 1 μM of colchicine (A,C,E) or doxorubicin (B,D,F), and with DMSO or 10 μM MG132.
Where indicated, cells where heat shocked for 1hr at 42 °C, and collected after the shock (no recovery) or after a recovery period of 3hrs at 37 °C. Analysed mRNA levels were normalized with RplP0 mRNA levels and expressed as relative levels mean of 4 independent replicates (*p 

Figure 7. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on…

Figure 7. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on the autophagic pathway (A–F) Q-PCR analyses of TFEB…

Figure 7. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on the autophagic pathway (A–F) Q-PCR analyses of TFEB (A,B), p62/SQSTM1 (C,D) and LC3 (E,F) mRNA levels performed on SH-SY5Y cells treated as described in Fig. 6.
The histograms represent analysed mRNA relative levels mean of 4 independent replicates (colchicine treatment, A, C and E; doxorubicin treatment, B, D and F) (*p < 0.05 vs DMSO; **p < 0.01 vs DMSO).

Figure 8. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on…

Figure 8. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on HSPB8 expression are TFEB-independent (A–F) Analysis of the…

Figure 8. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on HSPB8 expression are TFEB-independent (A–F) Analysis of the TFEB silencing on HSPB8 expression performed on SH-SY5Y cells transfected with an ON-TARGETplus TFEB siRNA or scramble siRNA, and treated with 500 nM of colchicine or doxorubicin, and with DMSO for 24 hrs. (A) Q-PCR analyses of TFEB mRNA levels.
TFEB mRNA relative levels were normalized on the levels of RplP0 and expressed as mean of 4 independent replicates (**p #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs treatment-corresponding scramble samples). (B) The histogram represents the quantification of the TFEB silencing (expressed as percentage). (C) Q-PCR analyses of HSPB8 mRNA levels (**p < 0.01 vs scramble/DMSO; °°p < 0.01 vs siRNA-TFEB/DMSO). (D) WB and WB quantification of TFEB (E) and HSPB8 (F) protein levels. The histograms represent densitometric analysis of three independent replicates for each sample (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs scramble/DMSO; °p < 0.05 and °°p < 0.01 vs siRNA-TFEB/DMSO, ##p < 0.01 vs treatment-corresponding scramble samples).

Figure 9. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on…

Figure 9. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on TDP-43 and TDP-25 aggregation (A) Representative immunofluorescence microscopy…

Figure 9. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on TDP-43 and TDP-25 aggregation (A) Representative immunofluorescence microscopy analysis (63x magnification and 2.5x zoom) performed in SH-SY5Y cells transiently transfected for 24 hrs with GFP-TDP-43 or GFP-TDP-25 plasmids and then treated for 24 hrs with 1 μM colchicine, doxorubicin or DMSO.
Left panels: GFP-TDP-43; right panels: GFP-TDP-25. DAPI: nuclei staining. RED: HSPB8. (B) Quantification of GFP-TDP-43 and GFP-TDP-25 positive cells with GFP-spots using Operetta Imaging System and Harmony software analysis (Perkin Elmer) on living SH-SY5Y cells transiently transfected and treated as described in A. Spots are defined with a range of size from 1 to 10 μm2 in SH-SY5Y treated as in A. SD refers to four independent replicates in HCS. (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs untreated control). (C) Quantification of spots area in GFP-TDP-43 and GFP-TDP-25 positive SH-SY5Y cells after drugs treatment obtained by Harmony software analysis (Perkin Elmer).(n = 4). (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs untreated control). (D,E) Representative FRA and FRA quantifications of the PBS extracts of SH-SY5Y cells transiently overexpressing the GFP-TDP-43 or GFP-TDP-25 plasmids treated or not with 500 nM of colchicine (left insets) or doxorubicin (right insets) the day after transfection, for the last 24 hrs prior to extraction. (D) The histograms represent densitometric analysis of three independent replicates for each sample (**p < 0.01 vs untreated GFP-TDP-43; °p < 0.05 vs untreated GFP-TDP-25). (E) The histogram represents the quantification of the GFP-TDPs insoluble species reduction percentage after treatment with colchicine or doxorubicin.
All figures (9)
Figure 7. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on…
Figure 7. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on the autophagic pathway (A–F) Q-PCR analyses of TFEB (A,B), p62/SQSTM1 (C,D) and LC3 (E,F) mRNA levels performed on SH-SY5Y cells treated as described in Fig. 6.
The histograms represent analysed mRNA relative levels mean of 4 independent replicates (colchicine treatment, A, C and E; doxorubicin treatment, B, D and F) (*p < 0.05 vs DMSO; **p < 0.01 vs DMSO).
Figure 8. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on…
Figure 8. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on HSPB8 expression are TFEB-independent (A–F) Analysis of the TFEB silencing on HSPB8 expression performed on SH-SY5Y cells transfected with an ON-TARGETplus TFEB siRNA or scramble siRNA, and treated with 500 nM of colchicine or doxorubicin, and with DMSO for 24 hrs. (A) Q-PCR analyses of TFEB mRNA levels.
TFEB mRNA relative levels were normalized on the levels of RplP0 and expressed as mean of 4 independent replicates (**p #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs treatment-corresponding scramble samples). (B) The histogram represents the quantification of the TFEB silencing (expressed as percentage). (C) Q-PCR analyses of HSPB8 mRNA levels (**p < 0.01 vs scramble/DMSO; °°p < 0.01 vs siRNA-TFEB/DMSO). (D) WB and WB quantification of TFEB (E) and HSPB8 (F) protein levels. The histograms represent densitometric analysis of three independent replicates for each sample (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs scramble/DMSO; °p < 0.05 and °°p < 0.01 vs siRNA-TFEB/DMSO, ##p < 0.01 vs treatment-corresponding scramble samples).
Figure 9. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on…
Figure 9. Colchicine and doxorubicin effects on TDP-43 and TDP-25 aggregation (A) Representative immunofluorescence microscopy analysis (63x magnification and 2.5x zoom) performed in SH-SY5Y cells transiently transfected for 24 hrs with GFP-TDP-43 or GFP-TDP-25 plasmids and then treated for 24 hrs with 1 μM colchicine, doxorubicin or DMSO.
Left panels: GFP-TDP-43; right panels: GFP-TDP-25. DAPI: nuclei staining. RED: HSPB8. (B) Quantification of GFP-TDP-43 and GFP-TDP-25 positive cells with GFP-spots using Operetta Imaging System and Harmony software analysis (Perkin Elmer) on living SH-SY5Y cells transiently transfected and treated as described in A. Spots are defined with a range of size from 1 to 10 μm2 in SH-SY5Y treated as in A. SD refers to four independent replicates in HCS. (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs untreated control). (C) Quantification of spots area in GFP-TDP-43 and GFP-TDP-25 positive SH-SY5Y cells after drugs treatment obtained by Harmony software analysis (Perkin Elmer).(n = 4). (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs untreated control). (D,E) Representative FRA and FRA quantifications of the PBS extracts of SH-SY5Y cells transiently overexpressing the GFP-TDP-43 or GFP-TDP-25 plasmids treated or not with 500 nM of colchicine (left insets) or doxorubicin (right insets) the day after transfection, for the last 24 hrs prior to extraction. (D) The histograms represent densitometric analysis of three independent replicates for each sample (**p < 0.01 vs untreated GFP-TDP-43; °p < 0.05 vs untreated GFP-TDP-25). (E) The histogram represents the quantification of the GFP-TDPs insoluble species reduction percentage after treatment with colchicine or doxorubicin.

References

    1. Galbiati M. et al. ALS-related misfolded protein management in motor neurons and muscle cells. Neurochem. Int. 79, 70–78, 10.1016/j.neuint.2014.10.007 (2014).
    1. Carra S. et al. Alteration of protein folding and degradation in motor neuron diseases: Implications and protective functions of small heat shock proteins. Prog. Neurobiol. 97, 83–100, 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.09.009 (2012).
    1. Ciechanover A. & Kwon Y. T. Degradation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic targets and strategies. Exp. Mol. Med. 47, e147, 10.1038/emm.2014.117 (2015).
    1. Ciechanover A. & Brundin P. The ubiquitin proteasome system in neurodegenerative diseases: sometimes the chicken, sometimes the egg. Neuron 40, 427–446, 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00606-8 (2003).
    1. Kampinga H. H. & Craig E. A. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 579–592, 10.1038/nrm2941 (2010).
    1. Kakkar V., Meister-Broekema M., Minoia M., Carra S. & Kampinga H. H. Barcoding heat shock proteins to human diseases: looking beyond the heat shock response. Dis. Mod. Mechan. 7, 421–434, 10.1242/dmm.014563 (2014).
    1. Carra S. et al. Different anti-aggregation and pro-degradative functions of the members of the mammalian sHSP family in neurological disorders. Philos. T. R. SOC. B 368, 20110409, 10.1098/rstb.2011.0409 (2013).
    1. Rusmini P. et al. Proteasomal and autophagic degradative activities in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Neurobiol. Dis. 40, 361–369, 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.06.016 (2010).
    1. Rusmini P. et al. The Role of the Protein Quality Control System in SBMA. J. Mol. Neurosci. in press, 10.1007/s12031-015-0675-6 (2015).
    1. Carra S., Seguin S. J., Lambert H. & Landry J. HspB8 chaperone activity toward poly(Q)-containing proteins depends on its association with Bag3, a stimulator of macroautophagy. J. Biol Chem. 283, 1437–1444, 10.1074/jbc.M706304200 (2008).
    1. Giorgetti E. et al. Synergic prodegradative activity of Bicalutamide and trehalose on the mutant androgen receptor responsible for spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 64–75, 10.1093/hmg/ddu419 (2015).
    1. Rusmini P. et al. Clearance of the mutant androgen receptor in motoneuronal models of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 2585–2603, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.05.026 (2013).
    1. Crippa V. et al. The small heat shock protein B8 (HspB8) promotes autophagic removal of misfolded proteins involved in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 3440–3456, 10.1093/hmg/ddq257 (2010).
    1. Crippa V. et al. A role of small heat shock protein B8 (HspB8) in the autophagic removal of misfolded proteins responsible for neurodegenerative diseases. Autophagy 6, 958–960, 10.4161/auto.6.7.13042 (2010).
    1. Minoia M. et al. BAG3 induces the sequestration of proteasomal clients into cytoplasmic puncta: Implications for a proteasome-to-autophagy switch. Autophagy 10, 1603–21, 10.4161/auto.29409 (2014).
    1. Seidel K. et al. The HSPB8-BAG3 chaperone complex is upregulated in astrocytes in the human brain affected by protein aggregation diseases. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 38, 39–53, 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2011.01198.x (2011).
    1. Carra S., Seguin S. J. & Landry J. HspB8 and Bag3: a new chaperone complex targeting misfolded proteins to macroautophagy. Autophagy 4, 237–239, 5407 (2008).
    1. Arndt V. et al. Chaperone-assisted selective autophagy is essential for muscle maintenance. Curr. Biol. 20, 143–148, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.022 (2010).
    1. Crippa V. et al. Motoneuronal and muscle-selective removal of ALS-related misfolded proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41, 1598–1604, 10.1042/BST20130118 (2013).
    1. Anagnostou G. et al. Vesicle associated membrane protein B (VAPB) is decreased in ALS spinal cord. Neurobiol. Aging 31, 969–985, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.07.005 (2010).
    1. Crippa V. et al. Differential autophagy power in the spinal cord and muscle of transgenic ALS mice. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 7, 234, 10.3389/fncel.2013.00234 (2013).
    1. Rusmini P. et al. Aberrant Autophagic Response in The Muscle of A Knock-in Mouse Model of Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy. Sci. Rep. 5, 15174, 10.1038/srep15174 (2015).
    1. Dobrowolny G. et al. Muscle expression of a local IGF-1 isoform protects motor neurons in an ALS mouse model. J. Cell Biol. 168, 193–199, 10.1083/jcb.200407021 (2005).
    1. Dobrowolny G., Aucello M., Molinaro M. & Musaro A. Local expression of mIgf-1 modulates ubiquitin, caspase and CDK5 expression in skeletal muscle of an ALS mouse model. Neurol. Res. 30, 131–136, 10.1179/174313208X281235 (2008).
    1. Dobrowolny G. et al. Skeletal muscle is a primary target of SOD1G93A-mediated toxicity. Cell Metab. 8, 425–436, 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.09.002 (2008).
    1. Palazzolo I. et al. Overexpression of IGF-1 in muscle attenuates disease in a mouse model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Neuron 63, 316–328, 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.019 (2009).
    1. Sahashi K. et al. Silencing neuronal mutant androgen receptor in a mouse model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 5985–94, 10.1093/hmg/ddv300 (2015).
    1. Halievski K., Mo K., Westwood J. T. & Monks D. A. Transcriptional Profile of Muscle following Acute Induction of Symptoms in a Mouse Model of Kennedy’s Disease/Spinobulbar Muscular Atrophy. PloS One 10, e0118120, 10.1371/journal.pone.0118120 (2015).
    1. Halievski K. et al. Androgen-dependent loss of muscle BDNF mRNA in two mouse models of SBMA. Exp. Neurol. 269, 224–32, 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.04.013 (2015).
    1. Acewicz A. et al. Morphological changes of skeletal muscle in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), Kennedy’s disease: a case report. Clin. Neuropathol. 34, 199–206, 10.5414/NP300829 (2015).
    1. Orsucci D. et al. Myopathic involvement and mitochondrial pathology in Kennedy disease and in other motor neuron diseases. Curr. Mol. Med. 14, 598–602, 10.2174/1566524014666140603100131 (2014).
    1. Lieberman A. P. et al. Peripheral androgen receptor gene suppression rescues disease in mouse models of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Cell Rep. 7, 774–784, 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.008 (2014).
    1. Cortes C. J. et al. Muscle expression of mutant androgen receptor accounts for systemic and motor neuron disease phenotypes in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Neuron 82, 295–307, 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.001 (2014).
    1. Soraru G. et al. Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: skeletal muscle pathology in male patients and heterozygous females. J. Neurol. Sci. 264, 100–105, 10.1016/j.jns.2007.08.012 (2008).
    1. Ramzan F. et al. Distinct Etiological Roles for Myocytes and Motor Neurons in a Mouse Model of Kennedy’s Disease/Spinobulbar Muscular Atrophy. J. Neurosci. 35, 6444–6451, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3599-14.2015 (2015).
    1. Huguenard A. L., Fernando S. M., Monks D. A. & Sengelaub D. R. Overexpression of androgen receptors in target musculature confers androgen sensitivity to motoneuron dendrites. Endocrinology 152, 639–650, 10.1210/en.2010-1197 (2011).
    1. Johansen J. A. et al. Recovery of function in a myogenic mouse model of spinal bulbar muscular atrophy. Neurobiol. Dis. 34, 113–120, 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.12.009 (2009).
    1. Monks D. A. et al. Overexpression of wild-type androgen receptor in muscle recapitulates polyglutamine disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18259–18264, 10.1073/pnas.0705501104 (2007).
    1. Bruinsma I. B. et al. Inhibition of alpha-synuclein aggregation by small heat shock proteins. Proteins 79, 2956–2967, 10.1002/prot.23152 (2011).
    1. Ramirez-Rodriguez G. et al. The alpha crystallin domain of small heat shock protein b8 (Hspb8) acts as survival and differentiation factor in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. The J. Neurosci. 33, 5785–5796, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6452-11.2013 (2013).
    1. Vicario M., Skaper S. D. & Negro A. The small heat shock protein HspB8: role in nervous system physiology and pathology. CNS Neurol. Dis. Drug Targets 13, 885–895, 10.2174/1871527313666140711093344 (2014).
    1. Fontaine J. M. et al. Abnormal small heat shock protein interactions involving neuropathy-associated HSP22 (HSPB8) mutants. FASEB J. 20, 2168–2170, 10.1096/fj.06-5911fje (2006).
    1. Irobi J. et al. Mutant HSPB8 causes motor neuron-specific neurite degeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 3254–3265, 10.1093/hmg/ddq234 (2010).
    1. Kwok A. S. et al. HspB8 mutation causing hereditary distal motor neuropathy impairs lysosomal delivery of autophagosomes. J. Neurochem. 119, 1155–1161, 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07521.x (2011).
    1. Carra S., Sivilotti M., Chavez Zobel A. T., Lambert H. & Landry J. HspB8, a small heat shock protein mutated in human neuromuscular disorders, has in vivo chaperone activity in cultured cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 1659–1669, 10.1093/hmg/ddi174 (2005).
    1. Zhang Y. J. et al. Progranulin mediates caspase-dependent cleavage of TAR DNA binding protein-43. J. Neurosci. 27, 10530–10534, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3421-07.2007 (2007).
    1. Huang C. C. et al. Metabolism and mis-metabolism of the neuropathological signature protein TDP-43. J. Cell Sci. 127, 3024–3038, 10.1242/jcs.136150 (2014).
    1. Alexandrova A., Petrov L., Georgieva A., Kirkova M. & Kukan M. Effects of proteasome inhibitor, MG132, on proteasome activity and oxidative status of rat liver. Cell Biochem. Funct. 26, 392–398, 10.1002/cbf.1459 (2008).
    1. Onesto E. et al. Muscle cells and motoneurons differentially remove mutant SOD1 causing familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurochem. 118, 266–280, 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07298.x (2011).
    1. Maggi R. et al. Effects and metabolism of steroid hormones in human neuroblastoma cells. Steroids 63, 257–262, 10.1016/S0039-128X(98)00038-5 (1998).
    1. Gamerdinger M. et al. Protein quality control during aging involves recruitment of the macroautophagy pathway by BAG3. EMBO J. 28, 889–901, 10.1038/emboj.2009.29 (2009).
    1. Behl C. BAG3 and friends: co-chaperones in selective autophagy during aging and disease. Autophagy 7, 795–798, 10.4161/auto.7.7.15844 (2011).
    1. Gamerdinger M., Kaya A. M., Wolfrum U., Clement A. M. & Behl C. BAG3 mediates chaperone-based aggresome-targeting and selective autophagy of misfolded proteins. EMBO Rep. 12, 149–156, 10.1038/embor.2010.203 (2011).
    1. Neumann M. et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 314, 130–133, 10.1126/science.1134108 (2006).
    1. Wang X. et al. Degradation of TDP-43 and its pathogenic form by autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Neurosci. Lett. 469, 112–116, 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.11.055 (2010).
    1. Gregory J. M., Barros T. P., Meehan S., Dobson C. M. & Luheshi L. M. The aggregation and neurotoxicity of TDP-43 and its ALS-associated 25 kDa fragment are differentially affected by molecular chaperones in Drosophila. PloS One 7, e31899, 10.1371/journal.pone.0031899 (2012).
    1. Sun X. et al. Induction of Hsp22 (HspB8) by estrogen and the metalloestrogen cadmium in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Cell Stress Chap . 12, 307–319, 10.1379/CSC-276.1 (2007).
    1. Hadden M. K., Galam L., Gestwicki J. E., Matts R. L. & Blagg B. S. Derrubone, an inhibitor of the Hsp90 protein folding machinery. J. Nat. Prod. 70, 2014–2018, 10.1021/np070190s (2007).
    1. Khalid S. & Paul S. Identifying a C-terminal ATP binding sites-based novel Hsp90-Inhibitor in silico: a plausible therapeutic approach in Alzheimer’s disease. Med. Hypotheses 83, 39–46, 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.04.013 (2014).
    1. Franceschelli S. et al. Bag3 gene expression is regulated by heat shock factor 1. J. Cell. Physiol. 215, 575–577, 10.1002/jcp.21397 (2008).
    1. Cleator S. et al. Gene expression patterns for doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (cytoxan) (AC) response and resistance. Breast Cancer Res. Tr. 95, 229–233, 10.1007/s10549-005-9009-7 (2006).
    1. Tacar O., Sriamornsak P. & Dass C. R. Doxorubicin: an update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 65, 157–170, 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01567.x (2013).
    1. Fornari F. A., Randolph J. K., Yalowich J. C., Ritke M. K. & Gewirtz D. A. Interference by doxorubicin with DNA unwinding in MCF-7 breast tumor cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 649–656 (1994).
    1. Pommier Y., Leo E., Zhang H. & Marchand C. DNA topoisomerases and their poisoning by anticancer and antibacterial drugs. Chem. Biol. 17, 421–433, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.04.012 (2010).
    1. Sun W. L., Chen J., Wang Y. P. & Zheng H. Autophagy protects breast cancer cells from epirubicin-induced apoptosis and facilitates epirubicin-resistance development. Autophagy 7, 1035–1044 (2011).
    1. Chatterjee K., Zhang J., Honbo N. & Karliner J. S. Doxorubicin cardiomyopathy. Cardiology 115, 155–162, 10.1159/000265166 (2010).
    1. Dimitrakis P., Romay-Ogando M. I., Timolati F., Suter T. M. & Zuppinger C. Effects of doxorubicin cancer therapy on autophagy and the ubiquitin-proteasome system in long-term cultured adult rat cardiomyocytes. Cell Tissue Res. 350, 361–372, 10.1007/s00441-012-1475-8 (2012).
    1. Sishi B. J., Loos B., van Rooyen J. & Engelbrecht A. M. Autophagy upregulation promotes survival and attenuates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 85, 124–134, 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.10.005 (2013).
    1. Gultekin N. & Kucukates E. Microtubule inhibition therapy by colchicine in severe myocarditis especially caused by Epstein-Barr and cytomegalovirus co-infection during a two-year period: a novel therapeutic approach. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 64, 1420–1423 (2014).
    1. Taskiran E. Z., Cetinkaya A., Balci-Peynircioglu B., Akkaya Y. Z. & Yilmaz E. The effect of colchicine on pyrin and pyrin interacting proteins. J. Cell. Biochem. 113, 3536–3546, 10.1002/jcb.24231 (2012).
    1. Laubscher T., Dumont Z., Regier L. & Jensen B. Taking the stress out of managing gout. Can. Fam. Physician 55, 1209–1212 (2009).
    1. Chen L. X. & Schumacher H. R. Gout: an evidence-based review. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 14, S55–62, 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181896921 (2008).
    1. Cocco G., Chu D. C. & Pandolfi S. Colchicine in clinical medicine. A guide for internists. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 21, 503–508, 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.09.010 (2010).
    1. Deftereos S. et al. Colchicine for prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: mid-term efficacy and effect on quality of life. Heart Rhythm 11, 620–628, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.02.002 (2014).
    1. Medani S. & Wall C. Colchicine toxicity in renal patients - Are we paying attention ? Clin. Nephrol. 10.5414/CN108343 (2015).
    1. van der Velden W., Huussen J., Ter Laak H. & de Sevaux R. Colchicine-induced neuromyopathy in a patient with chronic renal failure: the role of clarithromycin. Neth. J. Med. 66, 204–206 (2008).
    1. Lai I. C., Cheng C. Y., Chen H. H., Chen W. Y. & Chen P. Y. Colchicine myoneuropathy in chronic renal failure patients with gout. Nephrology 11, 147–150, 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2006.00542.x (2006).
    1. Xiao Y. et al. Suppressed autophagy flux in skeletal muscle of an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model during disease progression. Physiol. Rep. 3, 10.14814/phy2.12271 (2015).
    1. Zhang Y. J. et al. Aberrant cleavage of TDP-43 enhances aggregation and cellular toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7607–7612, 10.1073/pnas.0900688106 (2009).
    1. Cashman N. R. et al. Neuroblastoma x spinal cord (NSC) hybrid cell lines resemble developing motor neurons. Devel. Dyn. 194, 209–221, 10.1002/aja.1001940306 (1992).
    1. Durham H. D., Dahrouge S. & Cashman N. R. Evaluation of the spinal cord neuron X neuroblastoma hybrid cell line NSC-34 as a model for neurotoxicity testing. Neurotoxicol. 14, 387–395 (1993).
    1. Simeoni S. et al. Motoneuronal cell death is not correlated with aggregate formation of androgen receptors containing an elongated polyglutamine tract. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 133–144, 10.1093/hmg/9.1.133 (2000).
    1. Piccioni F. et al. Androgen receptor with elongated polyglutamine tract forms aggregates that alter axonal trafficking and mitochondrial distribution in motor neuronal processes. FASEB J. 16, 1418–1420, 10.1096/fj.01-1035fje (2002).
    1. Marron T. U. et al. Androgen-induced neurite outgrowth is mediated by neuritin in motor neurones. J. Neurochem. 92, 10–20, 10.1111/J.1471-4159.2004.02836.X (2005).
    1. Sau D. et al. Mutation of SOD1 in ALS: a gain of a loss of function. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 1604–1618, 10.1093/hmg/ddm110 (2007).
    1. Rusmini P. et al. Aggregation and proteasome: the case of elongated polyglutamine aggregation in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Neurobiol. Aging 28, 1099–1111, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.05.015 (2007).
    1. D’Agostino V. G., Adami V. & Provenzani A. A Novel High Throughput Biochemical Assay to Evaluate the HuR Protein-RNA Complex Formation. PloS One 8, e72426, 10.1371/journal.pone.0072426 (2013).

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera