Laboratory animals and respiratory allergies: the prevalence of allergies among laboratory animal workers and the need for prophylaxis

Erica Ferraz, Luisa Karla de Paula Arruda, Ericson Bagatin, Edson Z Martinez, Andrea A Cetlin, Christian S Simoneti, Amanda S Freitas, José A B Martinez, Marcos C Borges, Elcio O Vianna, Erica Ferraz, Luisa Karla de Paula Arruda, Ericson Bagatin, Edson Z Martinez, Andrea A Cetlin, Christian S Simoneti, Amanda S Freitas, José A B Martinez, Marcos C Borges, Elcio O Vianna

Abstract

Objective: Subjects exposed to laboratory animals are at a heightened risk of developing respiratory and allergic diseases. These diseases can be prevented by simple measures such as the use of personal protective equipment. We report here the primary findings of the Laboratory Animals and Respiratory Allergies Study regarding the prevalence of allergic diseases among laboratory animal workers, the routine use of preventive measures in laboratories and animal facilities, and the need for prevention programs.

Methods: Animal handlers and non-animal handlers from 2 Brazilian universities (University of São Paulo and State University of Campinas) answered specific questionnaires to assess work conditions and symptoms. These subjects also underwent spirometry, a bronchial challenge test with mannitol, and skin prick tests for 11 common allergens and 5 occupational allergens (rat, mouse, guinea pig, hamster, and rabbit).

Results: Four hundred fifty-five animal handlers (32±10 years old [mean±SD], 209 men) and 387 non-animal handlers (33±11 years old, 121 men) were evaluated. Sensitization to occupational allergens was higher among animal handlers (16%) than non-animal handlers (3%, p<0.01). Accessibility to personal protective equipment was measured at 85% (median, considering 73 workplaces of the animal handler group). Nineteen percent of the animal handlers indicated that they wear a respirator at all times while handling animals or working in the animal room, and only 25% of the animal handlers had received an orientation about animal-induced allergies, asthma, or rhinitis.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our data indicate that preventive programs are necessary. We suggest providing individual advice to workers associated with institutional programs to promote a safer work environment.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study enrollment.

References

    1. Bush RK, Wood RA, Eggleston PA. Laboratory animal allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102(1):99–112.
    1. Harries MG, Cromwell O. Occupational asthma caused by allergy to pigs' urine. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284(6319):867.
    1. Taylor AN, Longbottom JL, Pepys J. Respiratory allergy to urine proteins of rats and mice. Lancet. 1977;28043):847–9.
    1. Renstrom A, Malmberg P, Larsson K, Larsson PH, Sundblad BM. Allergic sensitization is associated with increased bronchial responsiveness: a prospective study of allergy to laboratory animals. Eur Respir J. 1995;8(9):1514–9.
    1. Aoyama K, Ueda A, Manda F, Matsushita T, Ueda T, Yamauchi C. Allergy to laboratory animals: an epidemiological study. Br J Ind Med. 1992;49(1):41–7.
    1. Bush RK, Stave GM. Laboratory animal allergy: an update. ILAR J. 2003;44(1):28–51.
    1. Renstrom A, Malmberg P, Larsson K, Sundblad BM, Larsson PH. Prospective study of laboratory-animal allergy: factors predisposing to sensitization and development of allergic symptoms. Allergy. 1994;49(7):548–52.
    1. Eggleston PA, Wood RA. Management of allergies to animals. Allergy Proc. 1992;13(6):289–92.
    1. Hunskaar S, Fosse RT. Allergy to laboratory mice and rats: a review of the pathophysiology, epidemiology and clinical aspects. Lab Anim. 1990;24(4):358–74.
    1. Newill CA, Evans R, III, Khoury MJ. Preemployment screening for allergy to laboratory animals: epidemiologic evaluation of its potential usefulness. J Occup Med. 1986;28(11):1158–64.
    1. Agrup G, Belin L, Sjostedt L, Skerfving S. Allergy to laboratory animals in laboratory technicians and animal keepers. Br J Ind Med. 1986;43(3):192–8.
    1. Skin tests used in type I allergy testing Position paper. Sub-Committee on Skin Tests of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy. 1989;44(Suppl 10):1–59.
    1. Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(3):1107–36.
    1. Crapo RO, Morris AH, Gardner RM. Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981;123(6):659–64.
    1. Anderson SD, Brannan JD. Methods for "indirect" challenge tests including exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, and hypertonic aerosols. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2003;24(1):27–54.
    1. Brannan JD, Anderson SD, Perry CP, Freed-Martens R, Lassig AR, Charlton B. The safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol as a bronchial provocation test for airway hyperresponsiveness: a phase 3 comparison study with hypertonic (4.5%) saline. Respir Res. 2005;6:144.
    1. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144(5):1202–18.
    1. Elliott L, Heederik D, Marshall S, Peden D, Loomis D. Progression of self-reported symptoms in laboratory animal allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116(1):127–132.
    1. Vianna EO, Garcia CA, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Rona RJ. Asthma definitions, relative validity and impact on known risk factors in young Brazilians. Allergy. 2007;62(10):1146–51.
    1. Singer J. A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal. Stat Med. 2001;20(7):1089–95.
    1. Slovak AJ, Hill RN. Laboratory animal allergy: a clinical survey of an exposed population. Br J Ind Med. 1981;38(1):38–41.
    1. Sole D, Camelo-Nunes IC, Wandalsen GF, Rosario NA, Sarinho EC. Is allergic rhinitis a trivial disease. Clinics. 2011;66(9):1573–7.
    1. Barbieri MA, Bettiol H, Silva AA, Cardoso VC, Simoes VM, Gutierrez MR, et al. Health in early adulthood: the contribution of the 1978/79 Ribeirao Preto birth cohort. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39(8):1041–55.
    1. Caldeira RD, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Terra-Filho J, Garcia CA, Vianna EO. Prevalence and risk factors for work related asthma in young adults. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(10):694–9.
    1. Henneberger PK, Redlich CA, Callahan DB, Harber P, Lemiere C, Martin J, et al. An official american thoracic society statement: work-exacerbated asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(3):368–78.
    1. Rona RJ, Vargas C, Vianna EO, Bustos P, Bettiol H, Amigo H, et al. Impact of specific sensitization on asthma and rhinitis in young Brazilian and Chilean adults. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(11):1778–86.
    1. Vianna EO, Gutierrez MR, Barbieri MA, Caldeira RD, Bettiol H, Da Silva AA. Respiratory effects of tobacco smoking among young adults. Am J Med Sci. 2008;336(1):44–9.
    1. Gordon S, Fisher SW, Raymond RH. Elimination of mouse allergens in the working environment: assessment of individually ventilated cage systems and ventilated cabinets in the containment of mouse allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(2):288–94.
    1. Schweitzer IB, Smith E, Harrison DJ, Myers DD, Eggleston PA, Stockwell JD, et al. Reducing exposure to laboratory animal allergens. Comp Med. 2003;53(5):487–92.
    1. Harrison DJ. Controlling exposure to laboratory animal allergens. ILAR J. 2001;42(1):17–36.
    1. Hoglund AU, Renstrom A. Evaluation of individually ventilated cage systems for laboratory rodents: cage environment and animal health aspects. Lab Anim. 2001;35(1):51–7.
    1. Reeb-Whitaker CK, Harrison DJ, Jones RB, Kacergis JB, Myers DD, Paigen B. Control strategies for aeroallergens in an animal facility. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103(1 Pt):139–46.
    1. Seward JP. Medical surveillance of allergy in laboratory animal handlers. ILAR J. 2001;42(1):47–54.
    1. Bland SM, Levine MS, Wilson PD, Fox NL, Rivera JC. Occupational allergy to laboratory animals: an epidemiologic study. J Occup Med. 1986;28(11):1151–7.
    1. Botham PA, Davies GE, Teasdale EL. Allergy to laboratory animals: a prospective study of its incidence and of the influence of atopy on its development. Br J Ind Med. 1987;44(9):627–32.
    1. Thulin H, Bjorkdahl M, Karlsson AS, Renstrom A. Reduction of exposure to laboratory animal allergens in a research laboratory. Ann Occup Hyg. 2002;46(1):61–8.
    1. Nicholson PJ, Mayho GV, Roomes D, Swann AB, Blackburn BS. Health surveillance of workers exposed to laboratory animal allergens. Occup Med (Lond) 2010;60(8):591–7.
    1. Goodno LE, Stave GM. Primary and secondary allergies to laboratory animals. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44(12):1143–52.
    1. Schmid K, Jungert B, Hager M, Drexler H. Is there a need for special preventive medical check-ups in employees exposed to experimental animal dust. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(3):319–27.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera