Co-trimoxazole versus azithromycin for the treatment of undifferentiated febrile illness in Nepal: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Sunil Pokharel, Buddha Basnyat, Amit Arjyal, Saruna Pathak Mahat, Raj Kumar Kc, Abhusani Bhuju, Buddhi Poudyal, Evelyne Kestelyn, Ritu Shrestha, Dung Nguyen Thi Phuong, Rajkumar Thapa, Manan Karki, Sabina Dongol, Abhilasha Karkey, Marcel Wolbers, Stephen Baker, Guy Thwaites, Sunil Pokharel, Buddha Basnyat, Amit Arjyal, Saruna Pathak Mahat, Raj Kumar Kc, Abhusani Bhuju, Buddhi Poudyal, Evelyne Kestelyn, Ritu Shrestha, Dung Nguyen Thi Phuong, Rajkumar Thapa, Manan Karki, Sabina Dongol, Abhilasha Karkey, Marcel Wolbers, Stephen Baker, Guy Thwaites

Abstract

Background: Undifferentiated febrile illness (UFI) includes typhoid and typhus fevers and generally designates fever without any localizing signs. UFI is a great therapeutic challenge in countries like Nepal because of the lack of available point-of-care, rapid diagnostic tests. Often patients are empirically treated as presumed enteric fever. Due to the development of high-level resistance to traditionally used fluoroquinolones against enteric fever, azithromycin is now commonly used to treat enteric fever/UFI. The re-emergence of susceptibility of Salmonella typhi to co-trimoxazole makes it a promising oral treatment for UFIs in general. We present a protocol of a randomized controlled trial of azithromycin versus co-trimoxazole for the treatment of UFI.

Methods/design: This is a parallel-group, double-blind, 1:1, randomized controlled trial of co-trimoxazole versus azithromycin for the treatment of UFI in Nepal. Participants will be patients aged 2 to 65 years, presenting with fever without clear focus for at least 4 days, complying with other study criteria and willing to provide written informed consent. Patients will be randomized either to azithromycin 20 mg/kg/day (maximum 1000 mg/day) in a single daily dose and an identical placebo or co-trimoxazole 60 mg/kg/day (maximum 3000 mg/day) in two divided doses for 7 days. Patients will be followed up with twice-daily telephone calls for 7 days or for at least 48 h after they become afebrile, whichever is later; by home visits on days 2 and 4 of treatment; and by hospital visits on days 7, 14, 28 and 63. The endpoints will be fever clearance time, treatment failure, time to treatment failure, and adverse events. The estimated sample size is 330. The primary analysis population will be all the randomized population and subanalysis will be repeated on patients with blood culture-confirmed enteric fever and culture-negative patients.

Discussion: Both azithromycin and co-trimoxazole are available in Nepal and are extensively used in the treatment of UFI. Therefore, it is important to know the better orally administered antimicrobial to treat enteric fever and other UFIs especially against the background of fluoroquinolone-resistant enteric fever.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02773407 . Registered on 5 May 2016.

Keywords: Azithromycin; Co-trimoxazole; Enteric fever; Fever clearance time; Undifferentiated febrile illness.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study will be conducted in accordance with the current revision of the Declaration of Helsinki [28] and, as applicable to an interventional study, the ICH Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice 1996. The study has been approved by the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC) Ethical Review Board (Reference: 1618) and the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC reference: 15-16). Any modifications in the protocol will be reported as protocol amendment to the Ethics Committees at NHRC and OxTREC.

Patients will be enrolled into the study only after signing a written informed consent. Clinicians enrolling the patients will ensure that a patient receives detailed information and complies with the study protocol.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Descriptive flow chart of study plan
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Figure: summary of enrollment, intervention and assessment. X Activities at hospital or home visits, Activities that will be recorded over a telephone call, (X) Will be done only for culture-positive patients at day 0 or those with persistent fever/symptoms, X* Will be done retrospectively if blood culture shows no growth after 7 days

References

    1. Crump JA, Kirk MD. Estimating the burden of febrile illnesses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004040.
    1. Zimmerman MD, Murdoch DR, Rozmajzl PJ, Basnyat B, Woods CW, Richards AL, et al. Murine typhus and febrile illness, Nepal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1656–9. doi: 10.3201/eid1410.080236.
    1. Thompson CN, Blacksell SD, Paris DH, Arjyal A, Karkey A, Dongol S, et al. Undifferentiated febrile illness in Kathmandu, Nepal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:875–8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0709.
    1. Thompson CN, Karkey A, Dongol S, Arjyal A, Wolbers M, Darton T, et al. Treatment response in enteric fever in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance: an individual patient data analysis of 2092 participants enrolled into 4 randomized, controlled trials in Nepal. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1522–31. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix185.
    1. Dolecek C, La TTP, Rang NN, Phuong LT, Vinh H, Tuan PQ, et al. A multi-center randomised controlled trial of gatifloxacin versus azithromycin for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children and adults in Vietnam. PLoS One. 2008;3(5):e2188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002188.
    1. Parry CM, Ho VA, Phuong LT, Bay PVB, Lanh MN, Tung LT, et al. Randomized controlled comparison of ofloxacin, azithromycin, and an ofloxacin-azithromycin combination for treatment of multidrug-resistant and nalidixic acid-resistant typhoid fever. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:819–25. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00447-06.
    1. Chinh NT, Parry CM, Ly NTHI, Ha HDUY, Thong MAIX, Diep TOS, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of azithromycin and ofloxacin for treatment of multidrug-resistant or nalidixic acid-resistant enteric fever. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1855–9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1855-1859.2000.
    1. Koirala S, Basnyat B, Arjyal A, Shilpakar O, Shrestha K, Shrestha R, et al. Gatifloxacin versus ofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever in Nepal: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002523.
    1. Arjyal A, Basnyat B, Nhan HT, Koirala S, Giri A, Joshi N, et al. Gatifloxacin versus ceftriaxone for uncomplicated enteric fever in Nepal: an open-label, two-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;3099:1–11.
    1. Parry CM, Thuy CT, Dongol S, Karkey A, Vinh H, Chinh NT, et al. Suitable disk antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints defining Salmonella enterica serovar typhi isolates with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:5201–8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00963-10.
    1. Thanh DP, Karkey A, Dongol S, Thi NH, Wong V, Tran N, et al. A novel ciprofloxacin-resistant subclade of H58 Salmonella typhi is associated with fluoroquinolone treatment failure. Elife. 2016;5:e14003.
    1. Sharvani R, Dayanand DK, Shenoy P, Sarmah P. Antibiogram of salmonella isolates : time to consider antibiotic salvage. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10:8–10.
    1. O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistance infections globally: final report and recommendations. .
    1. Thisyakorn U, Pethai M. Comparative efficacy of mecillinam, mecillinam/amoxicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of typhoid fever in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11:979–80.
    1. Schiraldi O, Sforza E, Piaia F. Effect of a new sulfa-trimethoprim combination (trimethoprim-sulfamethopyrazine) in typhoid fever. A double-blind study on 72 adult patients. Chemotherapy. 1985;31:68–75. doi: 10.1159/000238316.
    1. Shrestha KL, Pant ND, Bhandari R, Khatri S, Shrestha B. Re-emergence of the susceptibility of the Salmonella spp. isolated from blood samples to conventional first line antibiotics. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5:22.
    1. Chand HJ, Rijal KR, Neupane B, Sharma VK, Jha B. Re-emergence of susceptibility to conventional first line drugs in Salmonella isolates from enteric fever patients in Nepal. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8:1483–7. doi: 10.3855/jidc.4228.
    1. Maskey AP, Basnyat B, Thwaites GE, Campbell JI, Farrar JJ, Zimmerman MD. Emerging trends in enteric fever in Nepal: 9124 cases confirmed by blood culture 1993–2003. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:91–5. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.10.003.
    1. Karki M, Pandit S, Baker S, Basnyat B. Cotrimoxazole treats fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella typhi H58 infection. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:1–2.
    1. Arjyal A, Basnyat B, Koirala S, Karkey A, Dongol S, Agrawaal KK, et al. Gatifloxacin versus chloramphenicol for uncomplicated enteric fever: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:445–54. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70089-5.
    1. Piscitelli S, Danziger LHRK. Clarithromycin and azithromycin: new macrolide antibiotics. Clin Pharm. 1992;11:137–52.
    1. Smith L. Evaluation of a new sulfonamide, sulfamethoxazole (Gantanol) JAMA. 1964;11(187):142.
    1. Bushby SR, Hitchings GH. Trimethoprim, a sulphonamide potentiator. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1968;33(1):72–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb00475.x.
    1. Pandit A, Arjyal A, Day JN, Paudyal B, Dangol S, Zimmerman MD, et al. An open randomized comparison of gatifloxacin versus cefixime for the treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever. PLoS One. 2007;2:e542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000542.
    1. Howie S. Blood sample volumes in child health research : review of safe limits. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(1):46–53. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.080010.
    1. Aung AK, Spelman DW, Murray RJ, Graves S. Review article: rickettsial infections in Southeast Asia: implications for local populace and febrile returned travelers. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91:451–60. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0191.
    1. Thangarasu S, Natarajan P, Rajavelu P, Rajagopalan A. A protocol for the emergency department management of acute undifferentiated febrile illness in India. Int J Emerg Med. 2011;4:57. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-4-57.
    1. Kong H, West S. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Med Assoc Declaration Helsinki. 2008;1964:1–5.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera