PIK3CA mutations confer resistance to first-line chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Qiang Wang, Yan-Long Shi, Kai Zhou, Li-Li Wang, Ze-Xuan Yan, Yu-Lin Liu, Li-Li Xu, Shi-Wei Zhao, Hui-Li Chu, Ting-Ting Shi, Qing-Hua Ma, Jingwang Bi, Qiang Wang, Yan-Long Shi, Kai Zhou, Li-Li Wang, Ze-Xuan Yan, Yu-Lin Liu, Li-Li Xu, Shi-Wei Zhao, Hui-Li Chu, Ting-Ting Shi, Qing-Hua Ma, Jingwang Bi

Abstract

Chemotherapy represents an important treatment option for colorectal cancer (CRC), but only half of the patients benefit from these regimens. We explored the potential predicting value and mechanism of PIK3CA mutation in CRC chemotherapy. CRC specimens from 440 patients were retrospectively collected and examined with a fluorescence PCR-based method. The correlation of first-line chemotherapy response and PIK3CA mutation was evaluated according to follow-up and medical records. The underlying mechanism of PIK3CA mutation in chemotherapy resistance was assessed with CRC tumors and primary cells. The mutation frequency of the PIK3CA gene in CRC patients was 9.55%, which was correlated with late TNM staging and lower histological grade. The CRC patients with PIK3A mutation showed worse response to first-line chemotherapy than those without PIK3CA mutation. PIK3A mutation tumor cells showed poor sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. PIK3CA mutation induced PI3K/Akt signaling activation to increase LGR5+ CRC stem cells survival and proliferation, from which lead to chemotherapy resistance. Furthermore, PIK3CA mutation/LGR5+ expression was an independent detrimental factor for CRC patients. Our findings indicated that PIK3CA mutation induced PI3K/Akt activation contributed to CRC stem cells survival and proliferation, from which cells further resistance to chemotherapy. PIK3CA mutation/LGR5+ expression was a potential biomarker for monitoring chemotherapy resistance in CRC.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1. The correlation between chemotherapy response…
Fig. 1. The correlation between chemotherapy response and PIK3CA mutation status in CRC patients.
a The percentage of PIK3CA mutation in the patients effective and non-effective to first-line chemotherapy. *p < 0.05. b Chemotherapy rsponses among patients with wild-type, PIK3CA mutant, exon 9 mutant and exon 20 mutant tumors
Fig. 2. PIK3CA mutation correlates with first-line…
Fig. 2. PIK3CA mutation correlates with first-line chemotherapy resistance.
a Western blot analysis of pAkt, Akt and GAPDH (loading control) in primary CRC cells. b CC-1 and CC-2 cells were incubated with 5-Fu (25 µM) for 72 h. Cell viability was examined by the MTT assay. Results represent the mean ± S.E.M. of the values relative to vehicle controls; *P < 0.05. c CC-1 cells were incubated combined perifosine or LY294002 with 5-FU. Cell viability was examined by the MTT assay. The data are shown as means ± S.E.M. d Immunoblots showing caspase-3 and GAPDH (loading control) expression levels in CC-1 cells treated with perifosine or LY294002 combined with 5-Fu (1 μM) for 24 h, and in CC-2 cells. e The colorectal cancer cells (CC-1) were treated with perifosine, LY294002 or 5-Fu for 48 h and the cells were collected for apoptosis analysis by flow cytometry (n = 3). f In vivo tumorigenicity of CRC xenograft tumors treated with or without perifosine. The tumor growth was monitored every week until 6 weeks after injection. Data are shown as means ± S.E.M. *P < 0.05
Fig. 3. PIK3CA mutation related PI3K/Akt signaling…
Fig. 3. PIK3CA mutation related PI3K/Akt signaling increased CRC stem cell survival.
a Quantitative analysis of primary and secondary sphere formation by CC-1 and CC-2 cells. b Quantitative analysis of sphere formation by CRC cells treated with perifosine or LY294002. c Flow cytometry analysis of LGR5 expression in CC-1 and CC-2 cells. d qRT-PCR analysis of stem cell markers, CD133, C-MYC, LGR5, ALDH1A1, NANOG and CXCR4 genes expression in CC-1 and CC-2. e Immunoblots showing p-Akt, Akt, LGR5, C-myc and GAPDH (loading control) expression levels in PIK3CA mutant tumor tissue comparing with that without mutation. f Immunoblots showing p-Akt, Akt, LGR5, C-myc and GAPDH (loading control) expression levels in CC-1 cells treated with perifosine, LY294002 or BpV (phen) comparing with vehicle
Fig. 4. The prognostic value of PIK3CA…
Fig. 4. The prognostic value of PIK3CA mutation and LGR5+ in CRC patients.
a, b Kaplan–Meier analysis of the correlation between PIK3CA mutation and disease-free survival of 440 CRC patients from Jinan Military General Hospital. c Kaplan–Meier analysis of the correlation between PIK3CA mutation and overall survival of 440 CRC patients

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332.
    1. Marques RP, et al. Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) versus doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) backbone chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2017;118:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.08.006.
    1. Panczyk M. Pharmacogenetics research on chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer over the last 20 years. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9775–9827. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9775.
    1. Espersen ML, Olsen J, Linnemann D, Hogdall E, Troelsen JT. Clinical implications of intestinal stem cell markers in colorectal cancer. Clin. Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.12.004.
    1. Sepulveda AR, et al. Molecular biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer: guideline from the american society for clinical pathology, college of american pathologists, association for molecular pathology, and the american society of clinical oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:1453–1486. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9807.
    1. Kim HJ, et al. Subcellular localization of FOXO3a as a potential biomarker of response to combined treatment with inhibitors of PI3K and autophagy in PIK3CA-mutant cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:6608–6622.
    1. Hamada T, Nowak JA, Ogino S. PIK3CA mutation and colorectal cancer precision medicine. Oncotarget. 2017;8:22305–22306.
    1. Samuels Y, et al. High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science. 2004;304:554. doi: 10.1126/science.1096502.
    1. Chiu, J. W. et al. Molecular profiling of patients with advanced colorectal cancer: princess margaret cancer centre experience. Clin. Colorectal Cancer10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.010 (2017).
    1. Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat. Rev. Gene. 2006;7:606–619. doi: 10.1038/nrg1879.
    1. Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129:1261–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009.
    1. Samuels Y, et al. Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:561–573. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.05.014.
    1. Roper J, et al. The dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 induces tumor regression in a genetically engineered mouse model of PIK3CA wild-type colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025132.
    1. Zhou Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of PIK3CA mutation detection by circulating free DNA in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158143.
    1. Xu JM, et al. PIK3CA mutations contribute to acquired cetuximab resistance in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:4602–4616. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2738.
    1. Wang Z, Liu Z, Fang X, Yang H. MiR-142-5p suppresses tumorigenesis by targeting PIK3CA in non-small cell lung cancer. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017;43:2505–2515. doi: 10.1159/000484459.
    1. Karlsson T, et al. Endometrial cancer cells exhibit high expression of p110beta and its selective inhibition induces variable responses on PI3K signaling, cell survival and proliferation. Oncotarget. 2017;8:3881–3894.
    1. Fang DD, et al. Antitumor efficacy of the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PF-04691502 in a human xenograft tumor model derived from colorectal cancer stem cells harboring a PIK3CA mutation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067258.
    1. Mei ZB, Duan CY, Li CB, Cui L, Ogino S. Prognostic role of tumor PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:1836–1848. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw264.
    1. Paleari L, et al. PIK3CA mutation, aspirin use after diagnosis and survival of colorectal cancer. a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 2016;28:317–326. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.11.008.
    1. Hideshima T, et al. Perifosine, an oral bioactive novel alkylphospholipid, inhibits Akt and induces in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2006;107:4053–4062. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3434.
    1. Frank NY, Schatton T, Frank MH. The therapeutic promise of the cancer stem cell concept. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:41–50. doi: 10.1172/JCI41004.
    1. Rumora L, Barisic K, Maysinger D, Zanic Grubisic T. BpV (phen) induces apoptosis of RINm5F cells by modulation of MAPKs and MKP-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;300:877–883. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02952-2.
    1. Estilo CL, et al. The role of novel oncogenes squamous cell carcinoma-related oncogene and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110alpha in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003;9:2300–2306.
    1. Kim JY, et al. Clinical implications of genomic profiles in metastatic breast cancer with a focus on TP53 and PIK3CA, the most frequently mutated genes. Oncotarget. 2017;8:27997–28007.
    1. Mjos S, et al. PIK3CA exon9 mutations associate with reduced survival, and are highly concordant between matching primary tumors and metastases in endometrial cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10717-z.
    1. Christensen E, et al. Liquid biopsy analysis of FGFR3 and PIK3CA hotspot mutations for disease surveillance in bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 2017;71:961–969. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.016.
    1. Liao X, et al. Prognostic role of PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:2257–2268. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2410.
    1. Velho S, et al. BRAF, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations in colorectal serrated polyps and cancer: primary or secondary genetic events in colorectal carcinogenesis? BMC Cancer. 2008;8:255. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-255.
    1. Day FL, et al. PIK3CA and PTEN gene and exon mutation-specific clinicopathologic and molecular associations in colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;19:3285–3296. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3614.
    1. Perrone F, et al. PI3KCA/PTEN deregulation contributes to impaired responses to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 2009;20:84–90. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn541.
    1. Chen J, et al. BRAF V600E mutation and KRAS codon 13 mutations predict poor survival in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:802. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-802.
    1. Mao C, et al. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations and the loss of PTEN expression in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036653.
    1. Ligresti G, et al. PIK3CA mutations in human solid tumors: role in sensitivity to various therapeutic approaches. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:1352–1358. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.9.8255.
    1. Asati V, Bharti SK, Mahapatra DK, Asati V, Budhwani AK. Triggering PIK3CA mutations in PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis: exploration of newer inhibitors and rational preventive strategies. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016;22:6039–6054. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666160614000053.
    1. Ge S, Wang D, Kong Q, Gao W, Sun J. Function of miR-152 as a tumor suppressor in human breast cancer by targeting PIK3CA. Oncol. Res. 2017;25:1363–1371. doi: 10.3727/096504017X14878536973557.
    1. Barault L, et al. Mutations in the RAS-MAPK, PI(3)K (phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase) signaling network correlate with poor survival in a population-based series of colon cancers. Int. J. Cancer. 2008;122:2255–2259. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23388.
    1. Martinelli E, et al. Clinical outcome and molecular characterisation of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients with long-term efficacy of regorafenib treatment. ESMO Open. 2017;2:e000177. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000177.
    1. Souglakos J, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2009;101:465–472. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605164.
    1. Wu SJ, et al. PIK3CA mutation is associated with poor survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer following anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy: a meta-analysis. J. Cancer Res Clin. 2013;139:891–900. doi: 10.1007/s00432-013-1400-x.
    1. Lutz MP, et al. 3rd St. Gallen EORTC gastrointestinal cancer conference: consensus recommendations on controversial issues in the primary treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2017;79:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.022.
    1. Liu YS, Hsu HC, Tseng KC, Chen HC, Chen SJ. Lgr5 promotes cancer stemness and confers chemoresistance through ABCB1 in colorectal cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2013;67:791–799. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2013.08.001.
    1. Kinugasa Y, Matsui T, Takakura N. CD44 expressed on cancer-associated fibroblasts is a functional molecule supporting the stemness and drug resistance of malignant cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment. Stem Cells. 2014;32:145–156. doi: 10.1002/stem.1556.
    1. Seguin, L. et al. An integrin beta(3)-KRAS-RalB complex drives tumour stemness and resistance to EGFR inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol.16, 457–468 (2014).
    1. Malkomes P, et al. Selective AKT inhibition by MK-2206 represses colorectal cancer-initiating stem cells. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016;23:2849–2857. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5218-z.
    1. Cai ZR, et al. Significance of mTOR signaling and its inhibitor against cancer stem-like cells in colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014;21:179–188. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3146-8.
    1. Chen X, et al. LGR5 is required for the maintenance of spheroid-derived colon cancer stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014;34:35–42. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1752.
    1. Kobayashi S, et al. LGR5-positive colon cancer stem cells interconvert with drug-resistant LGR5-negative cells and are capable of tumor reconstitution. Stem Cells. 2012;30:2631–2644. doi: 10.1002/stem.1257.
    1. Greenwell IB, Ip A, Cohen JB. PI3K inhibitors: understanding toxicity mechanisms and management. Oncol. (Williston Park) 2017;31:821–828.
    1. Ma CX, et al. A phase ii trial of neoadjuvant MK-2206, an AKT inhibitor, with anastrozole in clinical stage II or III PIK3CA-mutant ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:6823–6832. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1260.
    1. Gray RT, et al. Evaluation of PTGS2 expression, PIK3CA mutation, aspirin use and colon cancer survival in a population-based cohort study. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2017;8:e91. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.18.
    1. Isakoff SJ, et al. Breast cancer-associated PIK3CA mutations are oncogenic in mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10992–11000. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2612.
    1. Wang Q, et al. High ERalpha36 expression level and membrane location predict poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Medicine. 2015;94:e1048. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001048.
    1. Wang B, et al. Metastatic consequences of immune escape from NK cell cytotoxicity by human breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5746–5757. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2563.
    1. Wang L, et al. MED12 methylation by CARM1 sensitizes human breast cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1500463. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500463.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera