Temporal trends, patterns, and predictors of preterm birth in California from 2007 to 2016, based on the obstetric estimate of gestational age

Anura W G Ratnasiri, Steven S Parry, Vivi N Arief, Ian H DeLacy, Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Laura A Halliday, Ralph J DiLibero, Kaye E Basford, Anura W G Ratnasiri, Steven S Parry, Vivi N Arief, Ian H DeLacy, Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Laura A Halliday, Ralph J DiLibero, Kaye E Basford

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth (PTB) is associated with increased infant mortality, and neurodevelopmental abnormalities among survivors. The aim of this study is to investigate temporal trends, patterns, and predictors of PTB in California from 2007 to 2016, based on the obstetric estimate of gestational age (OA).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluated 435,280 PTBs from the 5,137,376 resident live births (8.5%) documented in the California Birth Statistical Master Files (BSMF) from 2007 to 2016. The outcome variable was PTB; the explanatory variables were birth year, maternal characteristics and health behaviors. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used to identify subgroups with significant risk factors associated with PTB. Small for gestational age (SGA), appropriate for gestational age (AGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) infants were identified employing gestational age based on obstetric estimates and further classified by term and preterm births, resulting in six categories of intrauterine growth.

Results: The prevalence of PTB in California decreased from 9.0% in 2007 to 8.2% in 2014, but increased during the last 2 years, 8.4% in 2015 and 8.5% in 2016. Maternal age, education level, race and ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy, and parity were significant risk factors associated with PTB. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) showed that women in the oldest age group (40-54 years) were almost twice as likely to experience PTB as women in the 20- to 24-year reference age group. The prevalence of PTB was 64% higher in African American women than in Caucasian women. Hispanic women showed less disparity in the prevalence of PTB based on education and socioeconomic level. The analysis of interactions between maternal characteristics and perinatal health behaviors showed that Asian women have the highest prevalence of PTB in the youngest age group (< 20 years; AOR, 1.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-1.54). Pacific Islander, American Indian, and African American women ≥40 years of age had a greater than two-fold increase in the prevalence of PTB compared with women in the 20-24 year age group. Compared to women in the Northern and Sierra regions, women in the San Joaquin Valley were 18%, and women in the Inland Empire and San Diego regions 13% more likely to have a PTB. Women who smoked during both the first and second trimesters were 57% more likely to have a PTB than women who did not smoke. Compared to women of normal prepregnancy weight, underweight women and women in obese class III were 23 and 33% more likely to experience PTB respectively.

Conclusions: Implementation of public health initiatives focusing on reducing the prevalence of PTB should focus on women of advanced maternal age and address race, ethnic, and geographic disparities. The significance of modifiable maternal perinatal health behaviors that contribute to PTB, e.g. smoking during pregnancy and prepregnancy obesity, need to be emphasized during prenatal care.

Keywords: Appropriate for gestational age; Gestational age; Large for gestational age; Low birth weight; Maternal age; Maternal smoking; Prepregnancy obesity; Preterm birth; Small for gestational age; WIC.

Conflict of interest statement

The study was approved by the California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (Protocol ID: 16-10-2759) and the California Department of Public Health Vital Statistics Advisory Committee (ID: 16-10-2759). Patient consent was waived by the California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (Protocol ID: 16-10-2759).Permission for publication was included when requesting approval from both California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (Protocol ID: 16–10-2759) and the California Department of Public Health Vital Statistics Advisory Committee. We are to provide published materials to both institutions.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Unadjusted prevalence of and adjusted odds ratio for preterm singleton birth for each maternal age group in California for the period 2007–2016
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Unadjusted prevalence of preterm birth for maternal age group by maternal race and ethnicity in California for the period 2007–2016
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Unadjusted prevalence of preterm birth for maternal education level by maternal race and ethnicity in California for the period 2007–2016
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Adjusted odds ratio (with 95% confidence interval in parenthesis) for the prevalence of preterm birth by each demographic region identified on a map of California for the period 2007–2016. Northern and Sierra region is the reference group

References

    1. Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345(6198):760–765. doi: 10.1126/science.1251816.
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–2172. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60820-4.
    1. Lee AC, Kozuki N, Cousens S, Stevens GA, Blencowe H, Silveira MF, et al. Estimates of burden and consequences of infants born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries with INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard: analysis of CHERG datasets. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2017;358:j3677. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3677.
    1. Katz J, Lee AC, Kozuki N, Lawn J, Cousens S, Blencowe H, et al. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:417–425. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60993-9.
    1. Murray E, Fernandes M, Fazel M, Kennedy SH, Villar J, Stein A. Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1062–1072. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13435.
    1. Christian P, Lee SE, Donahue Angel M, Adair LS, Arifeen SE, Ashorn P, et al. Risk of childhood undernutrition related to small-for-gestational age and preterm birth in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(5):1340–1355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt109.
    1. Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer SE, Gregory EC. Measuring gestational age in vital statistics data: transitioning to the obstetric estimate. Natl Vital Stat Rep : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. 2015;64(5):1–20.
    1. Dietz PM, England LJ, Callaghan WM, Pearl M, Wier ML, Kharrazi M. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(Suppl 2):62–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00862.x.
    1. Callaghan WM, Schieve LA, Dietz PM. Gestational age estimates from singleton births conceived using assisted reproductive technology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(Suppl 2):79–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00864.x.
    1. Joseph KS, Huang L, Liu S, Ananth CV, Allen AC, Sauve R, et al. Reconciling the high rates of preterm and postterm birth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):813–822. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255661.13792.c1.
    1. MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ. Behind international rankings of infant mortality: how the United States compares with Europe. NCHS data brief. 2009;23:1–8.
    1. Duryea EL, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The rate of preterm birth in the United States is affected by the method of gestational age assignment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(2):231.e1–231.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.038.
    1. Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH, Fanaroff AA, Kilpatrick S, LaCorte M, et al. Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991-1999. Pediatrics. 2002;110(1 Pt 1):143–151. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.143.
    1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. 2015;64(12):1–64.
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes . In: Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US); 2007.
    1. Richards JL, Kramer MS, Deb-Rinker P, Rouleau J, Mortensen L, Gissler M, et al. Temporal trends in late preterm and early term birth rates in 6 high-income countries in North America and Europe and association with clinician-initiated obstetric interventions. JAMA. 2016;316(4):410–419. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9635.
    1. Reichman NE, Hamilton ER, Hummer RA, Padilla YC. Racial and ethnic disparities in low birthweight among urban unmarried mothers. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12(2):204–215. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0240-1.
    1. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation . World Health Organ Technical Report Series. 2000. p. 894.
    1. Schrag D, Virnig BA, Warren JL. Linking Tumor Registry and Medicaid Claims to Evaluate Cancer Care Delivery. Health Care Financ Rev. 2009;30(4):61–73.
    1. Olsen IE, Groveman SA, Lawson ML, Clark RH, Zemel BS. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010;125(2):e214–e224. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0913.
    1. Ratnasiri AWG, Parry SS, Arief VN, DeLacy IH, Halliday LA, DiLibero RJ, et al. Recent trends, risk factors, and disparities in low birth weight in California, 2005–2014: a retrospective study. Maternal health, neonatology and. Perinatology. 2018;4:15.
    1. Savitz DA, Terry JW, Jr, Dole N, Thorp JM, Jr, Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1660–1666. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127601.
    1. Frey HA, Klebanoff MA. The epidemiology, etiology, and costs of preterm birth. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2016;21(2):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.011.
    1. Gynecologistis ACO Committee opinion no 611: method for estimating due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):863–866. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Alexander GR, de Caunes F, Hulsey TC, Tompkins ME, Allen M. Validity of postnatal assessments of gestational age: a comparison of the method of Ballard et al. and early ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):891–895. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91357-G.
    1. Chervenak FA, Skupski DW, Romero R, Myers MK, Smith-Levitin M, Rosenwaks Z, et al. How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(4):678–687. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70477-6.
    1. Nyberg DA, Abuhamad A, Ville Y. Ultrasound assessment of abnormal fetal growth. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28(1):3–22. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2003.10.010.
    1. Wisser J, Dirschedl P, Krone S. Estimation of gestational age by transvaginal sonographic measurement of greatest embryonic length in dated human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4(6):457–462. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1994.04060457.x.
    1. Ferre C, Callaghan W, Olson C, Sharma A, Barfield W. Effects of Maternal Age and Age-Specific Preterm Birth Rates on Overall Preterm Birth Rates - United States, 2007 and 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(43):1181–1184. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6543a1.
    1. Schoen CN, Tabbah S, Iams JD, Caughey AB, Berghella V. Why the United States preterm birth rate is declining. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(2):175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.011.
    1. Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L. The world wide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review on maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:31–38. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.062554.
    1. Osmundson SS, Gould JB, Butwick AJ, Yeaton-Massey A, El-Sayed YY. Labor outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;214(3):362.e1–362.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.103.
    1. Branum AM, Schoendorf KC. The influence of maternal age on very preterm birth of twins: differential effects by parity. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005;19(5):399–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00659.x.
    1. Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H, Liston R. The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(6):1410–1418. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000163256.83313.36.
    1. Hediger ML, Scholl TO. Schall JI, Krueger PM. Young maternal age and preterm labor. Ann Epidemiol. 1997;7(6):400–406. doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00046-X.
    1. Fuchs F, Monet B, Ducruet T, Chaillet N, Audibert F. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: a large cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191002.
    1. Goisis A, Remes H, Barclay K, Martikainen P, Myrskyla M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(11):1219–1226. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx177.
    1. Schempf AH, Branum AM, Lukacs SL, Schoendorf KC. Maternal age and parity-associated risks of preterm birth: differences by race/ethnicity. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(1):34–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00785.x.
    1. Scholl TO. Hediger ML, Huang J, Johnson FE, Smith W, Ances IG. Young maternal age and parity. Influences on pregnancy outcome. Ann Epidemiol. 1992;2(5):565–575. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(92)90001-7.
    1. Astolfi P, Ulizzi L, Zonta LA. Trends in childbearing and stillbirth risk: heterogeneity among Italian regions. Hum Biol. 2002;74(2):185–196. doi: 10.1353/hub.2002.0015.
    1. Cnattingius S, Forman MR, Berendes HW, Isotalo L. Delayed childbearing and risk of adverse perinatal outcome. A population-based study. JAMA. 1992;268(7):886–890. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490070068044.
    1. Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):727–733. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Sauer MV. Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1136–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.004.
    1. Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O’Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PloS One. 2013;8(2):e56583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056583.
    1. Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Washington AE. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Obstetrical Outcomes and Care: Prevalence and Determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(4):335–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.864.
    1. Lu MC, Halfon N. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective. Matern Child Health J. 2003;7(1):13–30. doi: 10.1023/A:1022537516969.
    1. Oliver ML, Shapiro TM. Black wealth/white wealth: a new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge; 1995.
    1. Geronimus AT, Bound J, Waidmann TA, Hillemeier MM, Burns PB. Excess mortality among blacks and whites in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(21):1552–1558. doi: 10.1056/nejm199611213352102.
    1. Shavers VL. Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(9):1013–1023.
    1. Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 2002;21(2):60–76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.60.
    1. Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, Cubbin C, Braveman PA. Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(3):263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.012.
    1. Bediako PT, BeLue R, Hillemeier MM. A Comparison of Birth Outcomes Among Black, Hispanic, and Black Hispanic Women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015;2(4):573–582. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0110-2.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) State-specific trends in U.S. live births to women born outside the 50 states and the District of Columbia--United States, 1990 and 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:1091–1095.
    1. Singh GK, Yu SM. Adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences between US- and foreign-born women in major US racial and ethnic groups. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(6):837–843. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.6.837.
    1. Forna F, Jamieson DJ, Sanders D, Lindsay MK. Pregnancy outcomes in foreign-born and US-born women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(3):257–265. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00307-2.
    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. pp. 1233–1240.
    1. Dietz PM, England LJ, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Tong VT, Farr SL, Callaghan WM. Infant morbidity and mortality attributable to prenatal smoking in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.009.
    1. Catalano PM, Ehrenberg HM. The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. BJOG. 2006;113(10):1126–1133. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00989.x.
    1. Bodnar LM, Catov JM, Klebanoff MA, Ness RB, Roberts JM. Prepregnancy body mass index and the occurrence of severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Epidemiology. 2007;18(2):234–239. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000254119.99660.e7.
    1. Chu SY, Callaghan WM, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Lau J, England LJ, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2070–2076. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2559a.
    1. Yao R, Ananth CV, Park BY, Pereira L, Plante LA. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(5):457.e1–457.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.044.
    1. Snowden JM, Mission JF, Marshall NE, Quigley B, Main E, Gilbert WM, et al. The Impact of maternal obesity and race/ethnicity on perinatal outcomes: Independent and joint effects. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016;24(7):1590–1598. doi: 10.1002/oby.21532.
    1. Kozhimannil KB, Hung P, Henning-Smith C, Casey MM, Prasad S. Association between loss of hospital-based obstetric services and birth outcomes in rural counties in the United States. JAMA. 2018;319(12):1239–1247. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1830.
    1. Joyce T, Gibson D, Colman S. The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in new York City. J Policy Anal Manage. 2005;24(4):661–685. doi: 10.1002/pam.20131.
    1. Sonchak L. The impact of WIC on birth outcomes. New evidence from South Carolina. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(7):1518–1525. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1951-y.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera