此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Pain-at-Work Toolkit (Definitive Trial)

2026年9月1日 更新者:University of Nottingham

Pain-at-Work Toolkit for Employees With Chronic Pain (Definitive Trial)

The Pain-at-Work Toolkit has been created together with people who live with chronic pain, employers, healthcare professionals, and a national pain charity. The aim of the toolkit is to help employees with ongoing pain feel more confident in managing their condition at work, know where to find support, and improve their workplace experience, so they can remain in the workforce. People with lived experience of chronic pain will help guide the project throughout, including reviewing study documents and helping choose what outcomes to measure.

The investigators will work with at least 30 organisations from different types of workplaces in the UK and invite more than 600 employees who live with pain to take part in the study. Organisations' employees will either receive access to the Pain-at-Work Toolkit and the Pain-at-Work Managers Toolkit ( to help managers support their staff) or the usual care that their organisation offers. Participants will be asked to complete online surveys at three points during the study. Intervention participants may be asked to take part in an interview at the end of the study to find out more about their experiences.

The study will examine whether the toolkit improves people's experience of work, including their productivity and ability to remain productive in their jobs. The investigators will also explore whether the toolkit offers good value for money.

Finally, the investigators will examine how the toolkit is used in practice-what works well, what might need improving, and how it could be made available to more employees in the future. The investigators will do this by interviewing employers or stakeholders involved in the employment of, support for, or policy development for adults with chronic pain.

研究概览

地位

邀请报名

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Background Chronic pain affects 28 million adults in the UK, significantly impacting their ability to be productive at work, feel fulfilled at work and/or remain in the active workforce. However, most people living with chronic pain cannot access work-related support from healthcare services, and the majority of employers do not routinely provide it. The Pain-at-Work Toolkit is a web-based resource that could help to reduce unfair differences in working lives for people with chronic pain, and positively impact their health and wellbeing, enhancing their productivity in the wider community. Co-created with people who live with pain, healthcare professionals and employers, this toolkit provides education and self-management advice to help people with chronic pain stay in, and thrive, at work.

The investigators tested the Pain-at-Work Toolkit in a preliminary trial in England ('feasibility trial' NCT05838677) . This showed that the Pain-at-Work Toolkit can be a very helpful support tool in the workplace for those living with chronic pain. The investigators recruited 18 organisations and 380 employees (50% and 217% more than expected, respectively), demonstrating that this toolkit meets a gap in employer provisions. Employees who received access to the toolkit valued its content and engaged with it without technical issues. Workers told investigators that their ability to work had improved after 6 months but these results need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Employers told investigators that they valued being able to offer it to their staff. The investigators are now updating the toolkit content to ensure it is relevant to employees across the UK.

The next step is to carry out a larger UK-wide study ('definitive trial'). The aim is to find out whether The Pain-at-Work Toolkit helps people to feel more able and confident at work, take fewer sick days, and be productive at work, and whether it provides good value for money.

The investigators will recruit at least 30 different organisations from across UK. These organisations will be randomly placed into one of two groups: one will access and use the Pain-at-Work Toolkit (the intervention group), and the other will continue as usual (the control group), to compare results fairly. A Pain-at-Work Manager Toolkit will be made available to line managers of organisations in the intervention group.

Over 600 employees will be recruited from these organisations. They will all be invited to complete online questionnaires at three time points: at recruitment, 3 months, and 6 months. The investigators will ask about their health and wellbeing, and factors relating to work, such as work ability, self-efficacy (confidence), sickness absence, work productivity, and intentions to leave.

This larger trial will include an 'implementation study'. This will involve conducting interviews with up to 60 people who have taken part in the trial and other stakeholders (such as employer representatives, line managers, HR or occupational health specialists, policymakers, professional bodies). The findings will shape our plans to make the Pain-at-Work Toolkit available widely to all workers with pain in the future.

Aims The aim of this study is to conduct a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial, with a built-in process and implementation evaluation, to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Pain at Work Toolkit for improving work ability in working-age adults with chronic pain across a range of UK workplaces.

  • To determine the effectiveness of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit for improving work ability in working-age adults with chronic pain
  • To determine intervention fidelity.
  • To explore the relationship between implementation fidelity and outcomes.
  • To understand the barriers and facilitators to successful implementation and rollout.
  • To generate strategies for future implementation, maintenance, and scalability.

Protocol/ Method

The study consists of 3 work packages:

  • Effectiveness trial (WP1),
  • Health economic evaluation (WP2),
  • Process and implementation evaluation (WP3).

Setting is community, comprised of employment settings in different sectors (public, private, third) in UK, varying in size (small:10-49 workers; medium: 50-249 workers; large: >250 workers).

Sample size estimate: The aim is to recruit of 70 worksites ("clusters"), approximately 35 per arm. Up to 685 participants ("employees") will be recruited from these clusters. A total sample of 685 employees across at least 70 clusters from across the UK (35 per arm) provides 80% power to detect a 0.6 point difference in WAI (SD 2.0; ICC 0.02), allowing for 60% attrition and with an expected cluster size of 10 per cluster.

Up to 60 participants (employees and stakeholders) will be invited to take part in the interview study. In the case of intervention employees, this will be after the 6-month survey has been completed. Stakeholders may be interviewed at any time during the study duration, but if they are from the intervention organisation, it is likely this will be after the employees have completed their 6-month survey.

Interviews will ascertain participants' views about the Pain-at-Work Toolkit, trial processes and outcome measures, and any perceived changes in individual or organisational outcomes.

Organisations are randomised to either i) active control group (SAU: support as usual), or ii) SAU plus Pain-at-Work Toolkit and Pain-at-Work Manager's Toolkit.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

685

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

    • Nottinghamshire
      • Nottingham、Nottinghamshire、英国、NG7 2HA
        • School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Working-age adults (employees), aged 18 and over,
  • Working in a participating organisation in the UK.
  • With chronic pain interfering with their ability to undertake or enjoy productive work,
  • Able to comprehend the English language and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Working-age adults (employees), aged 18 and over,
  • Working in a participating organisation in the UK.
  • With chronic pain interfering with their ability to undertake or enjoy productive work,
  • Able to comprehend the English language and provide informed consent.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Intervention
This is a cluster randomized trial. The level of randomization is organization. Participants (employees) receive Pain-at-Work Toolkit + Pain-at-Work Manager's Toolkit+ Support as Usual
This is a workplace trial, participating organisations will be randomized to intervention or control.
其他名称:
  • Pain-at-Work Managers Toolkit
Support as Usual
有源比较器:Contol
This is a cluster randomized trial. The level of randomization is organization. Participants (employees) receive Support as Usual
Support as Usual

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Work Ability
大体时间:To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).

Using the Work Ability Index 3 items (WAI).

  1. Assesses current work ability compared to highest work ability ever. Scale range is 0-10. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
  2. Assesses current work ability with respect to physical demands of work. Scale range 1-5. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
  3. Assesses current work ability with respect to mental demands of work. Scale range 1-5. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
干预的可接受性
大体时间:6个月
评估参与者是否认为干预可以接受的结果。 这将在 6 个月时在参与者访谈中自我报告。
6个月
工作压力
大体时间:评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
全局单项度量。 使用这个项目:“总的来说,你觉得你的工作压力有多大?”以 5 分制进行回答,从 1 =“完全没有压力”到 5 =“压力极大”。 较高的分数表示较差的结果。
评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
离职意向
大体时间:评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
全局单项度量。 使用项目:“你是否因为疼痛而考虑离职?” (是还是不是)。 负面反应是更好的结果。
评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
沮丧
大体时间:评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
使用患者健康问卷 (PHQ-2)。 量表用于筛查抑郁症。 分数范围为 0-6。 分数越高表明结果越差。
评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
焦虑
大体时间:评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
使用一般性焦虑症 (GAD-7)。 用作广泛性焦虑症的筛查工具和严重程度测量。 GAD-7 分数的计算方法是将分数 0、1、2 和 3 分配给“完全没有”、“几天”、“超过一半的天”和“几乎每天”的响应类别,分别将七个问题的分数相加。 总分范围为 0-21。 分数越高表明结果越差。
评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
与健康相关的生活质量
大体时间:评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
使用 EuroQol 五维问卷 (EQ-5D-5L)。 包含五个维度:活动能力、自我护理、日常活动、疼痛/不适和焦虑/抑郁。 每个维度有5个级别:没有问题、轻微问题、中等问题、严重问题和极端问题。 响应被编码为一位数字,表示每个维度中选择的严重性级别。 例如,“小问题”(例如 “我走路有轻微问题”)始终编码为“2”。 五个维度的数字可以组合成一个描述受访者健康状况的 5 位代码。 分数越高表明结果越差。
评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
Health-related quality of life VAS
大体时间:To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6months).
Evaluates health today in a single score. The range 0-100.
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6months).
Impairments in work and activities
大体时间:To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Using the Work Productivity and Impairments Scale (WPAI-GH). Measures impairments in both paid work and unpaid work. It measures absenteeism, presenteeism as well as the impairments in unpaid activity because of health problem during the past seven days. The WPAI yields four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed); 2. Presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness); 3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/ absenteeism plus presenteeism); 4. Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity (worse outcomes).
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Health resource use questionnaire
大体时间:Cumulative health resource use at time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months), time 2 (6 months).
Using a health care resource use questionnaire to measure completion rates for items of resource use, such as frequency of use of secondary and primary care, social care, private health care, and medications. Items are adapted from health economics data capture in previous research with pain populations. Minimum score zero, no maximum. Higher scores indicate greater frequency of resource use.
Cumulative health resource use at time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months), time 2 (6 months).
Social support at work
大体时间:To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Using the Demand Control Support Questionnaire (DCSQ) - Social Support Sub-Scale, consisting of 6 items covering: pleasant atmosphere, spirit of unity, colleagues' support, helpful colleagues, relationship with superiors, relationship with colleagues. Respondents are asked to report their levels of agreement or disagreement on a four-point Likert scale. Higher values indicate better outcomes (higher social support at work, score range 6-24).
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Work Self-Efficacy
大体时间:To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
This included six items, three ask about current: confidence to work, manage their condition and that working would not make the condition worse. The other three ask about future in one year: motivation to continue working, importance to continue and confidence to continue working. All rated 0-10, higher score equals higher self-efficacy.
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Occupational Self-Efficacy
大体时间:To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
The Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form (OSS-SF) rated from stongly disagree to strongly agree asks six items about the ability to remain calm, problem solve, handle difficulties, use experience, meet goals and cope with problems and job demands.
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Pain severity
大体时间:To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Measuring the current pain severity (0-10)
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Technology Acceptance
大体时间:3 months intervention only
Using the technology acceptance model questionnaire to access the acceptability of the Pain at Work Toolkit and the intention to use. Alongside and actual behaviour change.
3 months intervention only
Fidelity of intervention (Pain at Work Toolkit)
大体时间:At 6 months
Intervention fidelity will be checked through collection of usage data for the Pain at Work Toolkit, to assess engagement with the intervention.
At 6 months

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
机构报病缺勤记录
大体时间:评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
参与员工病假率的组织记录。
评估时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间的变化。
工作性质
大体时间:记录时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间参与者工作性质的任何变化。
使用英国标准工作技能分类(工作技能级别 1-4):主要职位和从事的行业。
记录时间 0(基线)、时间 1(3 个月)和时间 2(6 个月)之间参与者工作性质的任何变化。
Employment Status
大体时间:To document any changes in participant's employment status between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Using items from the Work Transitions Index (WTI) covering employment status, occupation and working hours
To document any changes in participant's employment status between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

合作者

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Holly Blake, PhD、University of Nottingham

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年5月11日

初级完成 (估计的)

2028年9月30日

研究完成 (估计的)

2029年2月28日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年4月7日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月14日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年5月22日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月4日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月1日

最后验证

2026年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • IRAS 367449
  • OBF/FR-000025871 (其他赠款/资助编号:Nuffield Foundation / Arthritis UK Oliver Bird Fund)
  • FMHS 120-0226 (其他标识符:Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ethics Committee, University of Nottingham, UK)
  • 26011 (其他标识符:Sponsor, University Of Nottingham, UK)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

Protocol - details shared via clinical trials.gov and protocol manuscript (with informed consent form) to be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal within 6 months.

Data Management Plan will be publicly available on https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk prior to study start.

Protocol - baseline (registration) 6 months (submitted protocol for publication) Statistical analysis plan - baseline Informed consent form - 6 months (submitted protocol for publication)

IPD 共享时间框架

Protocol - baseline (registration) 6 months (submitted protocol for publication) Statistical analysis plan - baseline Informed consent form - 6 months (submitted protocol for publication).

IPD 共享访问标准

Protocol - details shared via clinical trials.gov and protocol manuscript (with informed consent form) to be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal within 6 months.

Data Management Plan will be publicly available on https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk prior to ethical approval and study start.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液
  • 国际碳纤维联合会

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.