此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Tailored Treatment of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (TTOP-AF)

2018年9月17日 更新者:Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

Tailored Treatment of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation - TTOP-AF

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic Cardiac Ablation System compared to medical therapy in the persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation population.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

210

阶段

  • 第三阶段

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale、Arizona、美国、85251
        • Arizona Arrhythmia Research Center
    • California
      • Los Angeles、California、美国、90095
        • UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville、Florida、美国、32224
        • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta、Georgia、美国、30309
        • Piedmont Hospital
      • Atlanta、Georgia、美国、30308
        • Emory Crawford Long Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago、Illinois、美国、60637
        • University of Chicago
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis、Indiana、美国、46202
        • Krannert Institute of Cardiology
    • Iowa
      • Davenport、Iowa、美国、52803
        • Genesis Medical Center
      • Des Moines、Iowa、美国、50309
        • Iowa Heart Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore、Maryland、美国、21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
      • Takoma Park、Maryland、美国、20912
        • Washington Adventist Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital Cardiac Arrhythmia
      • Burlington、Massachusetts、美国、01805
        • Lahey Clinic
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor、Michigan、美国、48109
        • University of Michigan
      • Grand Rapids、Michigan、美国、49503
        • Spectrum Health Research Department
    • New York
      • Rochester、New York、美国、14642
        • University of Rochester
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem、North Carolina、美国、27157
        • Wake Forest University
    • Ohio
      • Columbus、Ohio、美国、43210
        • The Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Erie、Pennsylvania、美国、16502
        • Consultants in Cardiovascular Diseases
    • Texas
      • Austin、Texas、美国、78756
        • Austin Heart
      • Houston、Texas、美国、77030
        • Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk、Virginia、美国、23507
        • Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute
      • Nieuwegein、荷兰
        • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 70年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • History of symptomatic, continuous atrial fibrillation defined as: Continuous atrial fibrillation lasting greater than 1 year but less than 4 years or nonself-terminating atrial fibrillation, lasting greater than 7 days but no more than 1 year, with at least one failed direct current cardioversion. A failed cardioversion was defined as an unsuccessful cardioversion or one in which normal sinus rhythm was established but not maintained beyond 7 days.
  • Atrial fibrillation symptoms included the following: palpitations, fatigue,exertional dyspnea, exercise intolerance
  • Age between 18 and 70 years
  • Failure of at least one Class I or III rhythm control drug
  • Willingness, ability and commitment to participate in baseline and follow-up evaluations for the full length of the study.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Structural heart disease of clinical significance including:

    • Previous cardiac surgery (excluding coronary artery bypass graft and mitral valve repair)
    • Symptoms of congestive heart failure including, but not limited to, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure and/or documented ejection fraction <40% measured by acceptable cardiac testing
    • Left atrial diameter >55 mm
    • Moderate to severe mitral or aortic valvular heart disease
    • Stable/unstable angina or ongoing myocardial ischemia
    • Myocardial infarction (MI) within 3 months of enrollment
    • Congenital heart disease (not including atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale without a right to left shunt) where the underlying abnormality increases the risk of an ablative procedure
    • Prior atrial septal defect of patent foramen ovale closure with a device using a percutaneous approach
    • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular septal wall thickness >1.5 cm)
    • Pulmonary hypertension (mean or systolic pulmonary artery pressure >50 mm Hg on Doppler echo)
  • Any prior ablation for atrial fibrillation
  • Enrollment in any other ongoing arrhythmia study
  • Any ventricular tachyarrhythmia currently being treated where the arrhythmia or the management may interfere with this study
  • Active infection or sepsis
  • Any history of cerebral vascular disease including stroke or transient ischemic attacks
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Left atrial thrombus at the time of ablation
  • Untreatable allergy to contrast media
  • Any diagnosis of atrial fibrillation secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or any other reversible or non-cardiovascular causes
  • History of blood clotting (bleeding or thrombotic) abnormalities
  • Known sensitivities to heparin or warfarin
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (defined as forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) <1)
  • Severe co-morbidity or poor general physical/mental health that, in the opinion of the investigator, will not allow the subject to be a good study candidate

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:1
Ablation Management
Arm 1 (Ablation Management): Ablation procedures using investigational catheters in left atrium. Cardioversion could be used to restore sinus rhythm if needed.
有源比较器:2
Medical Management
Arm 2 (Medical Management): Class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs. Changes in dosing, antiarrhythmic drugs or combinations of antiarrhythmic drugs were allowed. Direct current cardioversions were also allowed at the discretion of the investigator.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Chronic Effectiveness
大体时间:6 months

The chronic efficacy endpoint was a treatment success/failure measure for each subject computed at 6 months. Treatment success included:

  1. A 90% reduction in clinically significant atrial fibrillation from baseline to the 6 month time point based on a Holter recording. Clinically significant atrial fibrillation was defined as sustained atrial fibrillation lasting more than 10 minutes.
  2. The subject was off all antiarrhythmic drugs at 6 months (Ablation Management arm only)
  3. The Investigator judged all procedures to be acutely successful (Ablation Management arm only).
6 months
Acute Safety
大体时间:7 days
The primary endpoint for acute safety was a success/failure variable calculated for each subject in Ablation Management at the 7 day post-procedure time point. Any subject with at least one adverse event adjudicated by the Data Safety Monitoring Board as both serious and either probably or definitely procedure and/or device-related occurring within 7 days of the ablation procedure was considered an acute safety failure, regardless of whether the event occurred following the index or retreatment ablation procedure.
7 days
Chronic Safety
大体时间:6 months
The primary endpoint for chronic safety was a success/failure variable calculated for each subject at 6 months. Any subject that had at least one adverse event that met designated seriousness and relatedness criteria for the particular treatment group as adjudicated by the Data Safety Monitoring Board was considered a chronic safety failure. Adverse events in Ablation Management that were acute (≤7 days) were not included in the chronic safety primary endpoint. Given the disparity in the length of time at risk between treatment arms,the Chronic Safety endpoint was not statistically powered.
6 months

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Acute Efficacy
大体时间:Procedure conclusion

A treatment success/failure up to the conclusion of the procedure for each subject in Ablation Management. A subject was considered successfully treated if the following were true:

  • Medtronic ablation catheters were used to achieve procedure success.
  • All accessible pulmonary veins were isolated.
  • At least 50% reduction of complex fractionated atrial electrograms mapped and ablated with Medtronic ablation catheters.
  • Sinus rhythm was achieved upon leaving the electrophysiology lab (±cardioversion).
Procedure conclusion
Improvement of Left Atrial Size at 6 Months Compared to Baseline.
大体时间:6 months
Left atrial diameter (LAD), as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) looking at the longitudinal long axis at baseline and at the 6 month follow-up visit in both the Ablation and Medical Management arms.
6 months
Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at 6 Months Compared to Baseline.
大体时间:6 months
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram at baseline and 6 months in both the Ablation and Medical Management arms.
6 months
Improvement in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Symptom Severity Scores Over 6 Months Compared to Baseline.
大体时间:6 months
The severity of subject's atrial fibrillation related symptoms on a scale from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (most severe). The symptoms included palpitations, fatigue, shortness of breath, lightheadedness or dizziness, and lack of energy during exertion or exercise. The scores were tabulated at the 1, 3 and 6 month follow-up visits. Scores could range from 5 to 25, indicating a spectrum of subject status from asymptomatic to severely symptomatic.
6 months
Improved Quality of Life Over 6 Months Compared to Baseline.
大体时间:6 months
The SF-36 questionnaire was administered to subjects at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 month visits. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with only 36 questions. It yields an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. The possible range for Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score is 0 to 100. The higher score, the better quality of life.
6 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2007年5月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2010年11月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2010年11月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2007年8月8日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2007年8月8日

首次发布 (估计)

2007年8月10日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年10月16日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年9月17日

最后验证

2018年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • AFI-30

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

Medtronic Cardiac Ablation System的临床试验

3
订阅