此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Fruit and Vegetable Vouchers With and Without an SSB Tax (EVIDENCE)

2020年7月15日 更新者:Christopher Gardner、Stanford University

The EValuating Interventions in Diabetogenic Environments Through Natural Controlled Experiments (EVIDENCE) Trial

We aim to examine whether a purchasing incentive for healthy foods has the same effect on dietary intake in a community with and a community without a purchasing penalty for unhealthy foods. We will perform a randomized non-inferiority trial in two locations, San Francisco (SF) and Los Angeles (LA) to test whether a voucher for purchasing fresh fruits and vegetables has a similar effect in LA and in SF, where the former does not but the latter does have a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Participants will be recruited from 4 neighborhoods (N=312) with 2 SF neighborhoods (exposed to the SSB tax) and 2 LA neighborhoods (not exposed to the SSB tax).

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

We will test the hypothesis that a positive incentive for healthy foods (fresh fruits and vegetables, F&Vs) will be utilized as effectively in a community without a purchasing penalty for unhealthy foods (a sugar-sweetened beverage [SSB] tax) as in a community with a purchasing penalty for unhealthy foods (a SSB tax). Our experiment will test the empirically-driven hypothesis in a real-world setting through a noninferiority design: comparing the impact of F&V vouchers in two counties, one without (Los Angeles) and one with (San Francisco) a SSB tax.

Each study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets.

Half of these participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has implemented a SSB tax (SF); the other half will receive and spend these same vouchers in a non-tax environment (LA).

Each individual participant will be enrolled in the study for a total of seven months from initial orientation and participant consent (M0) to final data collection during final month of intervention (M6).

We are using a non-inferiority trial design. We are aiming to test whether there is a significant difference in total cup-equivalents of F&V intake in LA participants as compared to SF participants when given F&V vouchers. That is, we aim to test whether the F&V voucher is less effective in LA than in SF. This is important to test because it has been purported that SF has a unique food environment with high accessibility to fresh F&V through farmer's markets and a plethora of corner stores, as well as a SSB tax that discourages less healthy foods, potentially leaving more funds for healthier F&Vs. Thus, we aim to determine the change in consumption of F&V in LA participants is non-inferiority to that of SF participants, when both are given F&V vouchers.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

313

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • California
      • San Francisco、California、美国、94158
        • University of California
      • Stanford、California、美国、94305
        • Stanford University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

21年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Understand English sufficiently to provide informed consent;
  2. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form;
  3. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study;
  4. Any gender, aged 21 years or older;
  5. Have self-reported income ≤250% of the federal poverty level;
  6. Have regular access to a mobile phone;
  7. Have a safe and secure mailing address at which to receive vouchers;
  8. Be a resident of the Counties of San Francisco or Los Angeles as defined by official municipal boundaries.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently participating in any other dietary or nutrition study that would impact his or her normal eating patterns;
  2. Currently be enrolled in and receiving EatSF, CHIVES, or Vouchers4Veggies vouchers;
  3. Has active diagnosis of cancer or congestive heart failure;
  4. Is planning to move out of San Francisco or Los Angeles in the next 12 months;
  5. Currently pregnant.
  6. Currently live with and share a food budget with a current Vouchers4Veggies, EVIDENCE, or CHIVES study participant.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:San Francisco
Each study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets. The San Francisco participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has implemented a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.
Participants will receive four vouchers, each dated for a month, to be used on fruits and vegetables at specified local corner stores, supermarkets, and farmer's markets for a duration of six months. Each study participant will have the same intervention, as this is a non-inferiority trial to compare voucher use in LA and test whether the nutritional effects of that use are non-inferior to use in SF.
其他名称:
  • Voucher
有源比较器:Los Angeles
Each study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets. The Los Angeles participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has NOT implemented a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.
Participants will receive four vouchers, each dated for a month, to be used on fruits and vegetables at specified local corner stores, supermarkets, and farmer's markets for a duration of six months. Each study participant will have the same intervention, as this is a non-inferiority trial to compare voucher use in LA and test whether the nutritional effects of that use are non-inferior to use in SF.
其他名称:
  • Voucher

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in fruit and vegetable consumption
大体时间:Month 0 to Month 6
Change in fruit and vegetable consumption from baseline (BL), i.e., before voucher receipt, to the end of the intervention at the end of month 6 (M6), i.e., during the final month of voucher receipt, measured by two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in nutrition quality per HEI score
大体时间:Month 0 to Month 6
Change in nutrition quality of study participants from BL to M6, measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), which is calculated from two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in nutrition quality per AHEI score
大体时间:Month 0 to Month 6
Change in nutrition quality of study participants from BL to M6, measured by the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), which is calculated from two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in SSB consumption
大体时间:Month 0 to Month 6
Change in SSB consumption from BL to M6, measured in change in fluid ounces, as measured by two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in overall caloric intake
大体时间:Month 0 to Month 6
Change in overall caloric intake from BL to M6, measured in change in kcal, as measured by two 24-hour dietary recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Overall percentage of vouchers redeemed
大体时间:Month 0 to Month 6
Overall percentage of vouchers redeemed per participant, measured by how many vouchers each participant redeemed as compared to how many vouchers they received over the 6 month intervention period.
Month 0 to Month 6

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Dean Schillinger, MD、University of California, San Francisco
  • 首席研究员:Sanjay Basu, MD, PhD、Assistant Professor of Medicine

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2018年5月31日

初级完成 (实际的)

2019年9月9日

研究完成 (实际的)

2019年9月9日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2018年5月31日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2018年6月21日

首次发布 (实际的)

2018年6月26日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年7月17日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2020年7月15日

最后验证

2020年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • 43831

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

3
订阅