이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Fruit and Vegetable Vouchers With and Without an SSB Tax (EVIDENCE)

2020년 7월 15일 업데이트: Christopher Gardner, Stanford University

The EValuating Interventions in Diabetogenic Environments Through Natural Controlled Experiments (EVIDENCE) Trial

We aim to examine whether a purchasing incentive for healthy foods has the same effect on dietary intake in a community with and a community without a purchasing penalty for unhealthy foods. We will perform a randomized non-inferiority trial in two locations, San Francisco (SF) and Los Angeles (LA) to test whether a voucher for purchasing fresh fruits and vegetables has a similar effect in LA and in SF, where the former does not but the latter does have a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Participants will be recruited from 4 neighborhoods (N=312) with 2 SF neighborhoods (exposed to the SSB tax) and 2 LA neighborhoods (not exposed to the SSB tax).

연구 개요

상태

완전한

상세 설명

We will test the hypothesis that a positive incentive for healthy foods (fresh fruits and vegetables, F&Vs) will be utilized as effectively in a community without a purchasing penalty for unhealthy foods (a sugar-sweetened beverage [SSB] tax) as in a community with a purchasing penalty for unhealthy foods (a SSB tax). Our experiment will test the empirically-driven hypothesis in a real-world setting through a noninferiority design: comparing the impact of F&V vouchers in two counties, one without (Los Angeles) and one with (San Francisco) a SSB tax.

Each study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets.

Half of these participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has implemented a SSB tax (SF); the other half will receive and spend these same vouchers in a non-tax environment (LA).

Each individual participant will be enrolled in the study for a total of seven months from initial orientation and participant consent (M0) to final data collection during final month of intervention (M6).

We are using a non-inferiority trial design. We are aiming to test whether there is a significant difference in total cup-equivalents of F&V intake in LA participants as compared to SF participants when given F&V vouchers. That is, we aim to test whether the F&V voucher is less effective in LA than in SF. This is important to test because it has been purported that SF has a unique food environment with high accessibility to fresh F&V through farmer's markets and a plethora of corner stores, as well as a SSB tax that discourages less healthy foods, potentially leaving more funds for healthier F&Vs. Thus, we aim to determine the change in consumption of F&V in LA participants is non-inferiority to that of SF participants, when both are given F&V vouchers.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

313

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, 미국, 94158
        • University of California
      • Stanford, California, 미국, 94305
        • Stanford University

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

21년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Understand English sufficiently to provide informed consent;
  2. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form;
  3. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study;
  4. Any gender, aged 21 years or older;
  5. Have self-reported income ≤250% of the federal poverty level;
  6. Have regular access to a mobile phone;
  7. Have a safe and secure mailing address at which to receive vouchers;
  8. Be a resident of the Counties of San Francisco or Los Angeles as defined by official municipal boundaries.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently participating in any other dietary or nutrition study that would impact his or her normal eating patterns;
  2. Currently be enrolled in and receiving EatSF, CHIVES, or Vouchers4Veggies vouchers;
  3. Has active diagnosis of cancer or congestive heart failure;
  4. Is planning to move out of San Francisco or Los Angeles in the next 12 months;
  5. Currently pregnant.
  6. Currently live with and share a food budget with a current Vouchers4Veggies, EVIDENCE, or CHIVES study participant.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 방지
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 더블

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: San Francisco
Each study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets. The San Francisco participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has implemented a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.
Participants will receive four vouchers, each dated for a month, to be used on fruits and vegetables at specified local corner stores, supermarkets, and farmer's markets for a duration of six months. Each study participant will have the same intervention, as this is a non-inferiority trial to compare voucher use in LA and test whether the nutritional effects of that use are non-inferior to use in SF.
다른 이름들:
  • Voucher
활성 비교기: Los Angeles
Each study participant will receive four paper vouchers per month for a total of six months. Each of these vouchers can be redeemed for fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables at a number of specified local corner stores, supermarkets, or farmer's markets. The Los Angeles participants will receive and spend these vouchers in an environment which has NOT implemented a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.
Participants will receive four vouchers, each dated for a month, to be used on fruits and vegetables at specified local corner stores, supermarkets, and farmer's markets for a duration of six months. Each study participant will have the same intervention, as this is a non-inferiority trial to compare voucher use in LA and test whether the nutritional effects of that use are non-inferior to use in SF.
다른 이름들:
  • Voucher

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in fruit and vegetable consumption
기간: Month 0 to Month 6
Change in fruit and vegetable consumption from baseline (BL), i.e., before voucher receipt, to the end of the intervention at the end of month 6 (M6), i.e., during the final month of voucher receipt, measured by two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in nutrition quality per HEI score
기간: Month 0 to Month 6
Change in nutrition quality of study participants from BL to M6, measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), which is calculated from two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in nutrition quality per AHEI score
기간: Month 0 to Month 6
Change in nutrition quality of study participants from BL to M6, measured by the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), which is calculated from two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in SSB consumption
기간: Month 0 to Month 6
Change in SSB consumption from BL to M6, measured in change in fluid ounces, as measured by two 24-hour recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Change in overall caloric intake
기간: Month 0 to Month 6
Change in overall caloric intake from BL to M6, measured in change in kcal, as measured by two 24-hour dietary recalls at each data collection point (BL and M6).
Month 0 to Month 6
Overall percentage of vouchers redeemed
기간: Month 0 to Month 6
Overall percentage of vouchers redeemed per participant, measured by how many vouchers each participant redeemed as compared to how many vouchers they received over the 6 month intervention period.
Month 0 to Month 6

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Dean Schillinger, MD, University of California, San Francisco
  • 수석 연구원: Sanjay Basu, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Medicine

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2018년 5월 31일

기본 완료 (실제)

2019년 9월 9일

연구 완료 (실제)

2019년 9월 9일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2018년 5월 31일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2018년 6월 21일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 6월 26일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 7월 17일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2020년 7월 15일

마지막으로 확인됨

2020년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 43831

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

심혈관 질환에 대한 임상 시험

3
구독하다