此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

CBDV 与安慰剂在 30 岁以下患有普瑞德威利综合症 (PWS) 的儿童和成人中的对比

2026年4月16日 更新者:Eric Hollander

大麻二酚 (CBDV) 与安慰剂在 30 岁以下患有普瑞德威利综合征 (PWS) 的儿童和成人中的对比

本试验旨在研究大麻二酚 (CBDV) 治疗 PWS 儿童的疗效和安全性。

研究概览

详细说明

该临床研究试验旨在研究大麻二酚 (CBDV) 的疗效和安全性,大麻二酚是植物大麻素大麻二酚 (CBD) 的一种天然同系物,对患有普瑞德-威利综合征 (PWS) 的儿童和年轻人有效。 CBDV 具有独立于 CB1 和 CB2 受体激活的作用和良好的安全性。 本提案针对 Prader Willi Research 基金会的五年 PWS 研究计划:计划 1,临床护理研究:寻求评估旨在减少行为症状(如易怒)的治疗方法,以改善患有此病的个体的生活质量PWS 及其家人。 GW Pharmaceuticals 将向该网站提供 CBDV 药物和匹配的安慰剂以及额外资金。

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

6

阶段

  • 阶段2

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • New York
      • The Bronx、New York、美国、10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

5年 至 30年 (孩子、成人)

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

纳入标准

  1. 5至30岁的男性或女性门诊病人。
  2. PWS 的诊断通过基因检测和患者病历和病史确认。
  3. 在研究开始前 4 周和研究期间进行稳定的药理学、教育、行为和/或饮食干预。
  4. 进行 PWS 规范范围内的体检和化验结果
  5. 父母/看护者/监护人在场,能够同意他们参与并完成有关患者在整个研究过程中的发育和行为的评估。 如果受试者年满 7 岁并且具有理解和签署书面同意书和/或口头同意的心智能力,则将获得儿童同意书。
  6. 基线时临床整体印象量表严重程度 (CGI-S) 评分 ≥ 4(中度严重程度)。
  7. 基线时异常行为检查表 - 易怒 (ABC-I) 得分≥18。
  8. 同意不驾驶或操作机器。

排除标准

  1. 在随机分组前 30 天内接触过任何研究药物。
  2. 先前使用 CBD 或 CBDV 进行慢性治疗。
  3. 在筛选访视或基线访视时重复确认测试时通过尿液检测 THC 或其他滥用药物呈阳性。
  4. 包括大麻使用障碍在内的药物滥用障碍史
  5. PWS 以外的主要精神病学诊断,包括双相情感障碍、精神病、精神分裂症、PTSD 或 MDD。 由于潜在的混杂结果,这些患者将被排除在外。
  6. 严重影响受试者参与研究的能力、干扰研究的进行、混淆研究结果的解释或危及受试者的健康(包括但不限于肝或肾损伤和心血管疾病)的医疗状况。
  7. 已知或疑似对 CBDV 或制剂中使用的赋形剂过敏(即 芝麻)。
  8. 肾功能、胰腺功能或血液功能障碍的临床指征,表现为尿素氮/肌酐值高于正常上限值,血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶值高于正常上限值两倍,血小板
  9. 基线筛选时心电图异常或筛选时收缩压临床显着姿势下降。 如果初始筛查 ECG 显示 QTcB 大于 460 毫秒,则将在同一坐位进行 2 次额外的 ECG,间隔 5 分钟。 如果在筛选时未被识别,则完整三次重复显示平均 QTcB 为 460 毫秒或更短以满足所有纳入/排除标准
  10. 怀孕的女性受试者将被排除在研究之外。 如果女性受试者能够怀孕,她将在进入研究之前接受妊娠试验。 将告知女性受试者在服用 CBDV 时不会怀孕。 女性受试者如果在研究期间怀孕,必须告诉研究者并咨询产科医生或母胎专家。

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:四人间

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:大麻素 (CBDV)
基于体重的 CBDV 剂量为 10 mg/kg/天,持续 12 周
CBDV is obtained from the Cannabis sativa L. plant and contains a negligible quantity (less than 0.2%) of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
安慰剂比较:匹配的安慰剂
基于体重的 10 mg/kg/天安慰剂给药,持续 12 周
安慰剂口服溶液含有匹配的赋形剂。

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Irritability Based on Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability (ABC-I) Subscale
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Irritability will be assessed using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability Subscale (ABC-I). The ABC-I is a well-characterized outcome that is accepted by the FDA for the purpose of labeling and is one of the best and most validated outcome measures in the developmental disabilities. The ABC-Irritability subscale consists of 15 questions that address the presence of irritability, aggression, tantrums and/or self-injury. Each item is rated on a scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all a problem") to 3 ("Severe problem"), resulting in a total score range of 0-45, such that higher ABC-I scores are indicative of more severe behavioral problems. Subjects must score an 18 or higher at screening to be included in the study. ABC-I scores for Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 are summarized in the table by study arm using descriptive statistics. Baseline results for this outcome can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Repetitive Behavior Based on the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R).
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Repetitive behavior will be evaluated using the RBS-R. RBS-R is a 43-item self-report questionnaire used to measure the breadth or repetitive behaviors in children, adolescents, and adults with ASD. The RBS-R consists of 6 subscales: Stereotyped Behavior, Self-injurious Behavior, Compulsive Behavior, Ritualistic Behavior, Sameness Behavior, and Restricted Behavior that have no overlap of item content. Each of the 43 items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Behavior does not occur") to 3 ("Behavior occurs and is a severe problem"), yielding an overall scoring range of 0-129, such that higher scores are associated with increased severity of the problem behavior. RBS-R scores for Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 are summarized in the table by study arm using descriptive statistics. Baseline results for this outcome can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Repetitive Behaviors Based on Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS)
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Obsessive-compulsive symptoms will be assessed using the CY-BOCS. The CY-BOCS is 10-item clinician-rated measure designed to assess the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in children/adolescents over the prior week. It consists of 5 primary sections: Time, Distress, Interference, Resistance, and Control of Symptoms. The 10 items are rated on a scale from 0 ("No symptoms") to 4 ("Extreme symptoms"), for an overall possible range of 0-40, with higher scores indicative of greater severity of symptoms. CY-BOCS scores for Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 are summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics. Baseline results for this outcome can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Hyperphagia
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Hyperphagia will be assessed using the Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials (HQ-CT). The HQ-CT is a 9-item caregiver-reported measure of the frequency and intensity of food-seeking behaviors in participants with Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) over the prior two-week period. The 9 items are graded on a Likert scale ranging from 0 ("No Hyperphagia") to 4 ("Most severe hyperphagia"), yielding an overall possible scoring range of 0-36, with higher scores indicating greater, more severe hyperphagia. HQ-CT scores for Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 are summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics. Baseline results for this outcome can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Global Functioning
大体时间:Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Global Functioning will be assessed using the Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I). The CGI-I is a global assessment which measures the change in a participant's illness severity, relative to a baseline, considering all symptoms, behaviors, and functional impairment. It consists of a 7-point clinician-rated scale as follows: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse. such that higher scores are indicative of worsening global function. CGI-I scores for Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 are summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Caregiver Strain
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Caregiver Strain will be evaluated using the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CSQ). The CSQ is a 21-item self-report questionnaire, consisting of 3 subscales, developed to assess caregiver strain/stress for families with a child living with an emotional or behavioral disorder. Items 1-11 assess Objective Strain. Items 12, 16-18, and 20-21 assess Subjective Internalized Strain. Items 13-15, and 19 assess Subjective Externalize Strain. All CSQ items are rated from 1 ("Not at all a problem") to 5 ("Very much a problem"). Scores are calculated by averaging items within each subscale to handle missing data and calculating a Global Score by summing the 3 subscale means for a total possible scale range of 3-15. Higher Global Scores are associated with increased Caregiver Strain. Global results scores for Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 are summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics. Baseline results for this outcome can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Rigid Behavior - Based on the Montefiore-Einstein Rigidity Scale-Revised-Prader-Willi Syndrome Scale (MERS-R-PWS)
大体时间:Week 12

Rigid behavior will be assessed based using the MERS-R-PWS. The MERS-R-PWS is a clinician-rated scale designed to assess 3 domains of rigid behavior in individuals with PWS:

Behavioral Rigidity (e.g., Insistence on sameness, things must be done in his/her way, etc.) Cognitive Rigidity (e.g., Special interests, inflexible adherence to rules, etc.) Protest (in response to deviation from rigidity; e.g., tantrum, irritability, arguing)

Each domain consists of 4 items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("No/None/Not difficult") to 4 ("Extreme/Extremely Difficult"), yielding a range of 0-16. Scores at Week 12 will only be completed for subjects who display rigid behaviors at baseline, week 4, week 8 and week 12. A total MERS-R-PWS score (0-48) is obtained by summing subscale score. Individual subscale scores (0-16) are also summarized. Higher MERS-R-PWS scores are indicative of greater rigidity within each domain and overall rigidity.

Week 12
Aberrant Behavior
大体时间:Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Aberrant Behavior will be assessed using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC). The ABC is a 58-item informative rating instrument used to measure maladaptive behaviors in individuals with developmental disabilities and ASD which resolves into 5 subscales: Irritability (15 items); Lethargy/Social withdrawal (16 items); Stereotypic behavior (7 items); Hyperactivity/noncompliance (16 items); and Inappropriate speech (4 items). The ABC is completed by a parent/caregiver who knows the participant well. The ABC measures behavior on a 4-point Likert severity scale: (0 = "Not all a problem," 1 = "Slight problem," 2 = "Moderately serious problem," and 3 = "Severe problem"). Scores for 4 of the 5 subscales are reported below (ABC-I results reported as part of the primary outcome). Higher ABC subscale scores indicate greater behavioral severity/dysfunction of that subscale. Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 scores are summarized by study arm. See Baseline Characteristics module for baseline data.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Sleep Quality
大体时间:Baseline through Week 12
Sleep quality will be assessed using ActiGraph GT9X-BT® activity monitors. Successfully screened patients will receive the actigraphy device prior to the onsite baseline visit and will record a minimum of three days of baseline activity data prior to study initiation. The ActiGraph GT9X-BT activity monitors are a well validated activity and sleep monitoring device widely utilized in clinical trials and health research. For this study the ActiGraph monitors will measure: Sleep Latency (the time it takes to fall asleep), Total Sleep Time (the total amount of time spent asleep), and sleep efficiency (percentage of time in bed actually spent sleeping). Sleep data is captured automatically via cloud service. All parameters will be reported in hours/minutes and summarized by study arm.
Baseline through Week 12

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Eric Hollander, MD、Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

  • Kalsner L, Chamberlain SJ. Prader-Willi, Angelman, and 15q11-q13 Duplication Syndromes. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62(3):587-606.
  • Angulo MA, Butler MG, Cataletto ME. Prader-Willi syndrome: a review of clinical, genetic, and endocrine findings. J Endocrinol Invest. 2015;38(12):1249-1263.
  • Miller J, Wagner M. Prader-Willi syndrome and sleep-disordered breathing. Pediatr Ann. 2013;42(10):200-204.
  • Butler MG, Hossain W, Sulsona C, Driscoll DJ, Manzardo AM. Increased plasma chemokine levels in children with Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A(3):563-571.
  • Viardot A, Sze L, Purtell L, et al. Prader-Willi syndrome is associated with activation of the innate immune system independently of central adiposity and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(7):3392-3399.
  • Irizarry KA, Miller M, Freemark M, Haqq AM. Prader Willi Syndrome: Genetics, Metabolomics, Hormonal Function, and New Approaches to Therapy. Adv Pediatr. 2016;63(1):47-77.
  • Rout U, Abdul-Rahman OA, Dhossche DM. An immunological basis of hyperphagia driven by GABAergic dysfunction in Prader-Willi Syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2012;78(4):462-464.
  • Knuesel I, Chicha L, Britschgi M, et al. Maternal immune activation and abnormal brain development across CNS disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(11):643-660.
  • Blackmon K. Structural MRI biomarkers of shared pathogenesis in autism spectrum disorder and epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;47:172-182.
  • Washington J, 3rd, Kumar U, Medel-Matus JS, Shin D, Sankar R, Mazarati A. Cytokinedependent bidirectional connection between impaired social behavior and susceptibility to seizures associated with maternal immune activation in mice. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;50:40- 45.
  • Basavarajappa BS, Nixon RA, Arancio O. Endocannabinoid system: emerging role from neurodevelopment to neurodegeneration. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2009;9(4):448-462.
  • Kerr DM, Downey L, Conboy M, Finn DP, Roche M. Alterations in the endocannabinoid system in the rat valproic acid model of autism. Behav Brain Res. 2013;249:124-132.
  • Klein TW, Cabral GA. Cannabinoid-induced immune suppression and modulation of antigen-presenting cells. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2006;1(1):50-64.
  • Devinsky O, Cilio MR, Cross H, et al. Cannabidiol: pharmacology and potential therapeutic role in epilepsy and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Epilepsia. 2014;55(6):791-802.
  • Siniscalco D, Bradstreet JJ, Cirillo A, Antonucci N. The in vitro GcMAF effects on endocannabinoid system transcriptionomics, receptor formation, and cell activity of autism-derived macrophages. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:78.
  • Jean-Gilles L, Gran B, Constantinescu CS. Interaction between cytokines, cannabinoids and the nervous system. Immunobiology. 2010;215(8):606-610.
  • Anavi-Goffer S, Baillie G, Irving AJ, et al. Modulation of L-alpha-lysophosphatidylinositol/GPR55 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling by cannabinoids. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(1):91-104.
  • Rock EM, Sticht MA, Duncan M, Stott C, Parker LA. Evaluation of the potential of the phytocannabinoids, cannabidivarin (CBDV) and Delta(9) -tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), to produce CB1 receptor inverse agonism symptoms of nausea in rats. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170(3):671-678.
  • Pagano E, Romano B, Iannotti FA, et al. The non-euphoric phytocannabinoid cannabidivarin counteracts intestinal inflammation in mice and cytokine expression in biopsies from UC pediatric patients. Pharmacol Res. 2019;149:104464.
  • De Petrocellis L, Ligresti A, Moriello AS, et al. Effects of cannabinoids and cannabinoidenriched Cannabis extracts on TRP channels and endocannabinoid metabolic enzymes. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163(7):1479-1494.
  • Deiana S, Watanabe A, Yamasaki Y, et al. Plasma and brain pharmacokinetic profile of cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidivarine (CBDV), Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) and cannabigerol (CBG) in rats and mice following oral and intraperitoneal administration and CBD action on obsessive-compulsive behaviour. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;219(3):859-873.
  • Olah A, Markovics A, Szabo-Papp J, et al. Differential effectiveness of selected nonpsychotropic phytocannabinoids on human sebocyte functions implicates their introduction in dry/seborrhoeic skin and acne treatment. Exp Dermatol. 2016;25(9):701-707.
  • Coiro P, Padmashri R, Suresh A, et al. Impaired synaptic development in a maternal immune activation mouse model of neurodevelopmental disorders. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;50:249-258.
  • Uzunova G, Pallanti S, Hollander E. Excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in autism spectrum disorders: Implications for interventions and therapeutics. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2016;17(3):174-186.
  • Hill AJ, Mercier MS, Hill TD, et al. Cannabidivarin is anticonvulsant in mouse and rat. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167(8):1629-1642.
  • Hill TD, Cascio MG, Romano B, et al. Cannabidivarin-rich cannabis extracts are anticonvulsant in mouse and rat via a CB1 receptor-independent mechanism. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170(3):679-692.
  • Burstein S. Cannabidiol (CBD) and its analogs: a review of their effects on inflammation. Bioorg Med Chem. 2015;23(7):1377-1385.
  • Murillo-Rodriguez E, Sarro-Ramirez A, Sanchez D, et al. Potential effects of cannabidiol as a wake-promoting agent. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2014;12(3):269-272.
  • Scopinho AA, Guimaraes FS, Correa FM, Resstel LB. Cannabidiol inhibits the hyperphagia induced by cannabinoid-1 or serotonin-1A receptor agonists. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011;98(2):268-272.
  • Kuo HY, Liu FC. Molecular Pathology and Pharmacological Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder-Like Phenotypes Using Rodent Models. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:422.
  • McCracken JT, McGough J, Shah B, et al. Risperidone in children with autism and serious behavioral problems. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(5):314-321.
  • Marcus RN, Owen R, Kamen L, et al. A placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study of aripiprazole in children and adolescents with irritability associated with autistic disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48(11):1110-1119.
  • Lam KS, Aman MG. The Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised: independent validation in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37(5):855-866.
  • Schertz HH, Odom SL, Baggett KM, Sideris JH. Parent-Reported Repetitive Behavior in Toddlers on the Autism Spectrum. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(10):3308-3316.
  • Ventola PE, Yang D, Abdullahi SM, Paisley CA, Braconnier ML, Sukhodolsky DG. Brief Report: Reduced Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors after Pivotal Response Treatment. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(8):2813-2820.
  • Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46(11):1006-1011.
  • McCandless SE, Yanovski JA, Miller J, et al. Effects of MetAP2 inhibition on hyperphagia and body weight in Prader-Willi syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(12):1751-1761.
  • Arora T, Broglia E, Pushpakumar D, Lodhi T, Taheri S. An investigation into the strength of the association and agreement levels between subjective and objective sleep duration in adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72406.
  • Baum KT, Shear PK, Howe SR, Bishop SL. A comparison of WISC-IV and SB-5 intelligence scores in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism. 2015;19(6):736745.
  • Roid GB, R. . Essentials of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (SB5) Assessment. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2004.
  • Luther K, Fung GM, Khorassani F. Cost Comparison of Atypical Antipsychotics: Paliperidone ER and Risperidone. Hosp Pharm. 2019;54(6):389-392.
  • Al Saabi A, Allorge D, Sauvage FL, et al. Involvement of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases UGT1A9 and UGT2B7 in ethanol glucuronidation, and interactions with common drugs of abuse. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41(3):568-574.

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2020年11月23日

初级完成 (实际的)

2024年10月31日

研究完成 (实际的)

2024年10月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2019年2月19日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2019年2月19日

首次发布 (实际的)

2019年2月20日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年5月7日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年4月16日

最后验证

2026年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

所有作为出版物基础的 IPD

IPD 共享时间框架

Following publication for an indefinite period.

IPD 共享访问标准

Contact Principal Investigator for availability of IPD data.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液
  • 国际碳纤维联合会
  • 企业社会责任

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

是的

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅