此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

建筑商大学不来梅(幼崽)的健康监视2025 (CUB-HS2025)

2026年9月22日 更新者:Prof. Dr. Sonia Lippke、Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

2025年,建筑商大学不来梅(CUB)的健康监视,以评估学生的健康和福祉

The aim of Health Surveillance is to analyze and describe the state of health of students at Constructor University, key influencing factors and individual resources by using mixed-method design.

研究概览

详细说明

The aim of Health Surveillance, plus the additional research by means of qualitative interviews is to analyze and describe the state of stress and health of students at Constructor University (CU) by using a mixed-methods approach, as well as explore the association and mechanism between stress and health of students at CU (and employees at HAW Hamburg), key influencing factors and individual resources. In areas where there is a need for action, the Health Surveillance plus this project, the additional qualitative interviews can provide detailed insights and/or in-depth analyses. The Health Surveillance thus provides information on health-related topics and delivers scientifically sound information as a basis for health-promoting discussions in the subsequent follow-up process at various levels (e.g. faculties and departments). In addition, the Health Surveillance plus the additional interviews at CU contributes to comparability with surveys at other German universities through the use of validated and standardized measuring instruments and in-depth qualitative interviews with qualitative content analysis, as well as to add new constructs (i.e., artificial intelligence and digital technology use) as well as democratic competences, as this turned out to be new and important factors. Main hypotheses are

  1. The Health Surveillance gives insights into the state of stress and health of students at CU, key influencing factors and individual resources by using a mixed-methods approach.
  2. With the Health Surveillance, health promotion at CU by using a mixed-methods approach, as well as explore the association and mechanism between stress and health of students at CU (and employees at HAW Hamburg), can be guided, and the promotion of mental health (including the reduction of loneliness and discrimination) can be strengthened.
  3. The health of students (and employees at HAW Hamburg), their perceived stress, loneliness and discrimination/minorization (disadvantage) as well as substance use, interrelates with participation in health-promoting activities?
  4. Recommendations can be derived for qualification and skills training of multipliers for health-promoting behavior (e.g., J-peers)?

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

373

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Free Hanseatic City of Bremen
      • Bremen、Free Hanseatic City of Bremen、德国、28759
        • Constructor University (formerly known as Jacobs University)
      • Bremen、Free Hanseatic City of Bremen、德国、28759
        • Constructor University Bremen

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

This project contains three phases, the first one is quantitative phase (2025), the second one is qualitative phase (Dec 2025-April 2026) and the third one is again quantitative phase (2026). All Constructor University students and students Germany-wide who wish to take part in the study will be included. In the quantitative phase, Iinclusion criteria are english English or German language for reading and writing skills, internet access and student status. In the qualitative phase, the inclusion criteria are English or Chinese language and between 18-30 years old. Before the start of the survey period and directly before the start of the online survey or interview, all participants will receive all relevant study information and actively declare their consent to participate in the study.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English language skills
  • Reading and writing skills
  • Internet access
  • Student status
  • Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Illiteracy
  • Massively limited cognitive abilities ( i.e. linguistic components of the digital offerings must be able to be used, and questionnaires completed, or interviews participated in) and severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., severe depression)

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 观测模型:COHORT
  • 时间观点:CROSS_SECTIONAL

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
students in a community case study

Students at Constructor University Bremen being assessed by means of an online questionnaire in 2025

Questionnaires and interviews were primarily used as assessment and introspection tools to collect data on study participants' experiences, perceptions, and behaviors. Their purpose was to facilitate measurement and reflection rather than to deliver an intervention. However, it is acknowledged that participation in questionnaires and interviews may have had unintended interventional effects. Specifically, the process of answering questions and reflecting on personal experiences can increase participants' self-awareness, prompt critical reflection, and potentially influence subsequent attitudes or behaviors.

其他名称:
  • assessments
  • introspection
students in Germany

Students at germany wide being assessed by means of an online questionnaire or qualitative interviews in 2026

Questionnaires and interviews were primarily used as assessment and introspection tools to collect data on study participants' experiences, perceptions, and behaviors. Their purpose was to facilitate measurement and reflection rather than to deliver an intervention. However, it is acknowledged that participation in questionnaires and interviews may have had unintended interventional effects. Specifically, the process of answering questions and reflecting on personal experiences can increase participants' self-awareness, prompt critical reflection, and potentially influence subsequent attitudes or behaviors.

其他名称:
  • assessments
  • introspection
employees

Employees at HAW Hamburg wide being assessed by means of an online questionnaire in 2025

Questionnaires and interviews were primarily used as assessment and introspection tools to collect data on study participants' experiences, perceptions, and behaviors. Their purpose was to facilitate measurement and reflection rather than to deliver an intervention. However, it is acknowledged that participation in questionnaires and interviews may have had unintended interventional effects. Specifically, the process of answering questions and reflecting on personal experiences can increase participants' self-awareness, prompt critical reflection, and potentially influence subsequent attitudes or behaviors.

其他名称:
  • assessments
  • introspection

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Loneliness
大体时间:2025 and 2026 (no matching)

University of California Los Angelese Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) - 3 Items (Schobin, Arriagada & Gibson-Kunze, 2024), Range 1 (never/nie) - 5 (very often/sehr oft), higher scores mean a worse outcome

Loneliness in private and study context - 9 Items (Techniker Krankenkasse, 2024), Range 1 (often) - 4 (never), higher scores mean better outcomes

2025 and 2026 (no matching)
Health literacy
大体时间:2025 and 2026 (no matching)

Health literacy - 10 Items (Lenartz, Söllner & Rudinger, 2014), Range 1 (does not apply/trifft überhaupt nicht zu) - 4 (does fully apply/trifft genau zu), higher scores mean a better outcome

2025 and 2026 (no matching)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Depression and anxiety
大体时间:2025 and 2026 (no matching)

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) - 4 Items (Kroenke, Spitzer, Williams & Löwe, 2009), Range 0 (not at all/überhaupt nicht) - 3 (nearly every day/beinahe jeden Tag), higher scores mean worse outcome

2025 and 2026 (no matching)
Subjective health status
大体时间:2025 and 2026 (no matching)

Subjective health status- 1 Item (WHO, 1996); Range 1 (very good/sehr gut) - 5 (very poor/schlecht), higher score means worse outcome

2025 and 2026 (no matching)
Student satisfaction
大体时间:2025 and 2026 (no matching)

Student satisfaction - 1 Item (Westermann, Heise, Spies & Trautwein, 1996), Range 0 (not at all satisfied/gar nicht zufrieden) - 100 (completely satisfied/vollkommen zufrieden), higher scores mean better outcome

2025 and 2026 (no matching)
HEI-Stress
大体时间:2025 and 2026 (no matching)

Higher Education Institution Stress (HEI-Stress) - 3 Items (Schmidt, Sieverding, Scheiter & Obergfell, 2013), Range 0 (not at all stressed/gar nicht gestresst) - 100 (very stressed/sehr gestresst), higher scores mean worse outcome

2025 and 2026 (no matching)

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Artificial intelligence and digital technology use
大体时间:2026

Artificial intelligence and digital technology use - 1 Item (adapted from Jerusalem & Schwarzer, 1999), 1 Item (adapted from Zhang, Tan, Chew, Hew, & Choo, 2025), 2 Items (adapted from Chen, Y., Chen, G., & Chen, J., 2026), 3 Items (Norman & Skinner, 2006)]

2026
Democratic competences/ Political Effectiveness/ Efficiency
大体时间:2026

• Democratic competences - 4 Items (Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2025; Die Einsamkeit junger Menschen ist eine Gefahr für die Demokratie)

2026
Belonging; Social Connectedness; Self-Efficacy and Health Behavior
大体时间:2025 and 2026 (no matching)

these outcomes were found to be interrelated with loneliness

2025 and 2026 (no matching)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Sonia Lippke, PhD、Constructor University Bremen gGmbH & Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, Germany

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年3月17日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年8月30日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年12月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2025年3月11日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2025年3月21日

首次发布 (实际的)

2025年3月27日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月25日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月22日

最后验证

2026年9月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅