Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement (ACQUIP)

April 6, 2015 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs
Health care organizations, including the VA, are investing substantial effort to improve quality of care. As part of this process, greater emphasis is being placed on measurement of outcomes, and in particular, functional outcomes and satisfaction as reported by patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Health care organizations, including the VA, are investing substantial effort to improve quality of care. As part of this process, greater emphasis is being placed on measurement of outcomes, and in particular, functional outcomes and satisfaction as reported by patients.

Objectives:

ACQUIP was designed to determine whether quality and outcomes of health care improve when primary care providers have access to regular assessments of their patients' health and function along with routine clinical data and information about clinical guidelines.

Methods:

This study was a randomized trial conducted at the General Internal Medicine Clinics of seven VA facilities. Each participating GIMC is organized into discrete firms staffed by different groups of providers who care for different patients. One randomly selected firm received the intervention and one served as control. Patients who made at least one GIMC visit in the last year were eligible to participate. Patients were surveyed at baseline to determine active medical problems. Subsequent mailings included a general evaluation of health status (SF-36), a satisfaction questionnaire and, as appropriate, one of six condition-specific questionnaires: the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, the Seattle Obstructive Lung Disease Questionnaire, the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (depression), and questionnaires regarding diabetes, drinking, and hypertension. Clinical/utilization data were downloaded weekly from VISTA and supplemented with data from Austin. The intervention consisted of multi-faceted reports to patients' primary care providers (at the time of patient visits) showing trended physiologic and health status data and guideline-derived recommendations. Clinicians also received periodical reports displaying trends in the health status and satisfaction of their patients compared with their clinic as a whole. Reports were supplemented by training on QI and health status measures.

Status:

Data collection was completed on April 1, 2000. Analysis of trial results will be completed January, 2001.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

62487

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • No. Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72114-1706
        • Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Center, Little Rock, AR
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1290
        • VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
      • West Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
    • Illinois
      • White River Junction, Illinois, United States, 05009-0001
        • White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Enrolled in VA GIM clinic with visit in past year

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Arm 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephan D. Fihn, MD MPH, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth E. Rosenfeld, MD, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
  • Principal Investigator: Marisue Cody, PhD RN MPA, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Center, Little Rock, AR

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2001

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2001

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2001

First Posted (Estimate)

March 16, 2001

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SDR 96-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Outcomes

Clinical Trials on Provision of health status information to patients provider

3
Subscribe