Enabling Symptom Identification and Tracking in Children Receiving Cancer Treatment

February 3, 2021 updated by: Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children

Refinement and Early Evaluation of SPARK, an Approach to Enable Symptom Screening and Monitoring by Children Receiving Cancer Treatments

Children with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients suffer from severe and bothersome symptoms because treatments are intense. So, the investigators developed SPARK (Supportive care Prioritization, Assessment and Recommendations for Kids), a website devoted to helping children track symptoms and providing a way to let doctors and nurses know which symptoms are bothersome. This study will examine the likelihood that children will complete SPARK once daily, help the investigators figure out how to improve the website so that children will use it, and help the investigators plan the large scale trial to test its efficacy in improving quality of life (QoL).

Participants will be children with cancer or HSCT recipients who are 8-18 years of age and who are expected to be in hospital or in clinic daily for 5 days.To determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of symptom feedback to healthcare providers

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methods: Participants will be children with cancer or HSCT recipients who are 8-18 years of age and who can understand English, and who are expected to be in hospital or in clinic daily for 5 days.

SPARK RCT will be a pilot multi-center RCT in which we will randomize children to either undergo daily symptom screening for 5 days with symptom reports provided to the healthcare team or standard of care. Feasibility will be met if at least 30 participants are enrolled within one year and at least 75% complete at least 60% of evaluations.

Quality of the Idea Children receiving cancer treatment have excellent survival outcomes, in part, related to the provision of intensive therapies. Unfortunately, most children suffer and experience severe and bothersome treatment-related symptoms. Symptoms not only impact on QoL and morbidity but, in addition, may negatively influence future psychosocial functioning.

Symptoms remain unaddressed even during healthcare encounters because children do not complain and clinicians fail to ask about them. We recently developed SSPedi, a pediatric-specific symptom screening tool on an iPad. SSPedi, however, consists only of the questions which ask about symptoms. SPARK is the web-based application which will facilitate access to SSPedi, encourage symptom screening, generate reports and allow children to track their symptoms. Careful thought to design is required to ensure SPARK optimizes future use and has clinical utility. The proposed project output is a product that facilitates longitudinal symptom screening and provides the groundwork for a future RCT of symptom feedback.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital For SickKids

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We will include children with cancer and HSCT recipients who are 8-18 years of age at enrollment and who can understand English.
  • Participants may be inpatients or outpatients, and may be actively receiving cancer treatment or may have completed treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria will be illness severity, cognitive disability, or visual impairment that precludes utilization of SPARK according to the healthcare team.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Symptom feedback to Health Care Provider
For those randomized to the intervention arm, symptom screening using SPARK will be completed once daily for 5 days on an iPad using the approach refined in aim 2. Daily SSPedi reports will be printed and provided in the patient chart. On days 1 and 3±1, a report describing symptoms that are "a lot" or "extremely" bothersome will be emailed to the physician providing direct medical care
These children will complete SPARK daily for 5 days in a row, daily symptom reports will be printed and provided in the patient chart. On days 1 and 3, a report describing symptoms that are "a lot" or "extremely" bothersome will be emailed to the physician providing direct medical
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard of care
For those randomized to the control arm, a clinical research associate will visit the participant on days 1 and 5±1 and will obtain SSPedi scores on an iPad. Reports will not be printed or emailed to the physician.
A clinical research associate will visit the participant on days 1 and 5±1 and will obtain SSPedi scores on an iPad. Reports will not be printed or emailed to the physician.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of an RCT of symptom feedback to healthcare providers versus standard of care
Time Frame: Study will be enrolling for 1 year with a goal to enroll 30 participants. Feasibility will be determined once all 30 participants have completed the study after 1 year
Will be determined by both the number of patients who are recruited for this study, and the number of patients who complete at least 60% of evaluations. We will aim to enroll 30 participants at SickKids over one year. Outcome feasibility will be met if at least 30 participants are enrolled within one year and at least 75% complete at least 60% of evaluations
Study will be enrolling for 1 year with a goal to enroll 30 participants. Feasibility will be determined once all 30 participants have completed the study after 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pediatric Quality of Life (Peds QL) Cancer Module Acute Version
Time Frame: Measure will be completed by participant on day 5±1 day.

Measures self-reported symptoms related to cancer treatment, capturing physical, psychological and cognitive health. 5-point likert scale ranging from 0(almost never) to 4 (almost always); there is no weighting of items. Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100. Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. Mean score is calculated= Sum of the items over the number of items answered.

Total Score is used and calculated by: Sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales. Higher scores indicate lower problems.

Measure will be completed by participant on day 5±1 day.
Symptom Screening in Pediatrics (SSPedi)
Time Frame: Those randomized to the intervention arm measure will be completed by participant every day for 5 days. Those randomized to control arm measure will be completed by participant on Days 1 and 5±1 day.
Self-reported symptom screening questionnaire asking pediatric patients (age 8-18) how bothered they are by 15 identified symptoms and side effects of cancer treatment. This 5-point Likert scale score from 0 (not bothered at all) to 4 (extremely bothered), and has a total score ranging from 0-60, with a higher number indicating more bother cancer-related symptoms. Likert scores will be summed for a total score that ranges from 0 (none) to 60 (worst possible).
Those randomized to the intervention arm measure will be completed by participant every day for 5 days. Those randomized to control arm measure will be completed by participant on Days 1 and 5±1 day.
Faces Pain Scale Revised
Time Frame: Measure will be completed on day 5±1 day.
The Faces Pain Scale Revised is a self-report measure of pain intensity developed for children to score the sensation of pain on the 0-to-10 metric. The scale shows a close linear relationship with visual analog pain scale, counting left to right; 0" = "no pain" and "10" = "very much pain
Measure will be completed on day 5±1 day.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 2, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 16, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Symptom feedback to Health Care Provider

3
Subscribe