Effects of St. John's Wort on the Oral Contraceptive Hormone Levonorgestrel

July 15, 2015 updated by: Patricia Murphy, University of Utah

Effects of St. John's Wort on Levonorgestrel

This study will determine the effects of St. John's wort, a common herbal remedy, on metabolism of the female contraceptive hormone levonorgestrel.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the last decade, St. John's wort has become one of the most commonly used botanicals. Levonorgestrel is a form of progesterone, a female hormone involved in conception. It can be given as both a pill and an injection and is used for contraception and for the treatment of endometriosis. However, evidence suggests that St. John's wort may reduce the effectiveness of the contraceptive hormone levonorgestrel. This study will determine whether interactions between St. John's wort and levonorgestrel reduce the effectiveness of the hormone. This study will also determine whether a higher dose of levonorgestrel will override the effects of St. John's wort.

All participants will receive a single dose of levonorgestrel between Days 9 and 12 of their first menstrual cycle after entering this study. Blood and urine collection will occur immediately after the levonorgestrel is given and every week until participants' next menstrual cycle to determine the levels of reproductive hormones in participants' bodies.

At the beginning of participants' next menstrual cycle, they will be randomly assigned to one of four groups and receive either St. John's wort or placebo for 6 weeks. Group 1 will receive a placebo; Groups 2 and 3 will receive a standard dose of St. John's wort (900 mg per day); and Group 4 will receive an increased dose of St. John's wort (1500 mg per day). After 6 weeks, Groups 1, 2, and 4 will receive 150 mcg levonorgestrel; and Group 3 will receive 225 mcg levonorgestrel. Blood and urine collection will occur immediately after levonorgestrel is given and every week until participants' next menstrual cycle.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 28 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 25
  • Regular menstrual cycles for at least 3 months prior to study entry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of foods, herbs, vitamins, over-the-counter supplements, or any medications that could alter pharmacokinetics of other drugs
  • Medical contraindications to the use of contraceptives

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Levonorgestrel 1.5 with Placebo Herb
This group had baseline pharmacokinetic studies after an oral dose of levonorgestrel (LNG) 1.5 mg, then took a placebo herb daily for 4-6 weeks, during which time pharmacokinetic studies were repeated after an oral dose of LNG 1.5 mg
Placebo herb three times daily (ground cellulose) for 4-6 weeks
Levonorgestrel in a single oral dose
Active Comparator: Levonorgestrel 1.5 with SJW 900 mg
This group had baseline pharmacokinetic studies after an oral dose of levonorgestrel (LNG) 1.5 mg, then took St. John's Wort (SJW) 900 mg a Day orally for 4-6 weeks, during which time pharmacokinetic studies were repeated after an oral dose of LNG 1.5 mg
Levonorgestrel in a single oral dose
St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) orally or 4-6 weeks
Active Comparator: Levonorgestrel 2.25 with SJW 900 mg
This group had baseline pharmacokinetic studies after an oral dose of levonorgestrel (LNG) 1.5 mg, then took a St. Johns's Wort 300 mg capsules three times daily for 4-6 weeks, during which time pharmacokinetic studies were repeated after an oral dose of LNG 2.25 mg
Levonorgestrel in a single oral dose
St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) orally or 4-6 weeks
Active Comparator: Levonorgestrel 1.5 with SJW 1500 mg
This group had baseline pharmacokinetic studies after an oral dose of levonorgestrel (LNG) 1.5 mg, then took a St. Johns's Wort 300 mg capsules five times daily for 4-6 weeks, during which time pharmacokinetic studies were repeated after an oral dose of LNG 1.5 mg
Levonorgestrel in a single oral dose
St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) orally or 4-6 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve for 0 to 24 Hours After Drug Administration, Done Between Days 9 and 12 of the Menstrual Cycle at Time 1 (Before) and Time 2 (During Treatment With St. John's Wort or Placebo)
Time Frame: Area Under the Concentration versus Time curve for 0 to 24 hours after drug administration, between Days 9 and 12 of the menstrual cycle, done at Time 1 and at Time 2

Pharmacokinetic studies were done between Days 9-12 of the menstrual cycle at Time 1 (baseline, before any treatment with herb or placebo), and at Time 2 (intervention, after treatment with herb or placebo). Serum samples drawn at 0, ½, 1, 1½, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours, following oral administration of a dose of levonorgestrel.

Treatment between the two time periods was with St. John's Wort or placebo herb, beginning after the Time 1 (baseline) and continued for 5 weeks until Time 2.

Estimates of levonorgestrel clearance were made using a two stage non-compartmental approach to determine individual and group parameters.

Area Under the Concentration versus Time curve for 0 to 24 hours after drug administration, between Days 9 and 12 of the menstrual cycle, done at Time 1 and at Time 2
Number of Participants With Progesterone Levels Above 3.0 ng/ml at Time 1 (Baseline) and Time 2 (After Intervention With St John's Wort or Placebo).
Time Frame: Progesterone levels drawn at weekly intervals after dosing with levonorgestrel between Days 9 and 12 of the menstrual cycle, at each time point until menses

Serum progesterone levels were drawn at the time of dosing with levonorgestrel and then at weekly intervals until menses occurred. This was done at Time 1 (baseline), and again at Time 2 (after 5 weeks of dosing with St. John's Wort or placebo).

Possible ovulation was defined as a serum progesterone >3ng/ml within 2 weeks of Days 9-12 of the menstrual cycle.

Progesterone levels drawn at weekly intervals after dosing with levonorgestrel between Days 9 and 12 of the menstrual cycle, at each time point until menses
Clearance (L/hr) of Levonorgestrel Over 24 Hours for Each Dosage Group and Each Study Session.
Time Frame: Time Frame: Time 1 (pre-intervention baseline) and Time 2 (following a 6 week intervention)
Average and standard deviation for Clearance (L/hr) of Levonorgestrel study for each dosage group and each study session.
Time Frame: Time 1 (pre-intervention baseline) and Time 2 (following a 6 week intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Levels of Follicle-stimulating Hormone Drawn at Weekly Intervals Until Next Menses
Time Frame: Time Frame: Time 1 (pre-intervention baseline) and Time 2 (following a 6 week intervention)

Descriptive reporting of secondary outcomes of reproductive hormone levels (including FSH, E2, LH).

Pharmacokinetic studies were done between Days 9-12 of the menstrual cycle at Time 1 (baseline, before any treatment with herb or placebo), and at Time 2 (intervention, after treatment with herb or placebo).

Weekly means are reported for both time periods at week 0 (day of pharmacokinetic study), week 1 (one week after pharmacokinetic study) and week 2 (2 weeks after pharmacokinetic study).

Time Frame: Time 1 (pre-intervention baseline) and Time 2 (following a 6 week intervention)
Mean Levels of Estradiol-17b (E2) Drawn at Weekly Intervals Until Next Menses
Time Frame: Time Frame: Time 1 (pre-intervention baseline) and Time 2 (following a 6 week intervention)

Descriptive reporting of secondary outcomes of reproductive hormone levels (including FSH, E2, LH).

Pharmacokinetic studies were done between Days 9-12 of the menstrual cycle at Time 1 (baseline, before any treatment with herb or placebo), and at Time 2 (intervention, after treatment with herb or placebo).

Weekly means are reported for both time periods at week 0 (day of pharmacokinetic study), week 1 (one week after pharmacokinetic study) and week 2 (2 weeks after pharmacokinetic study).

Time Frame: Time 1 (pre-intervention baseline) and Time 2 (following a 6 week intervention)
Mean Levels of Luteinizing Hormone, Drawn at Weekly Intervals Until Next Menses
Time Frame: Time Frame: Time 1 (pre-intervention baseline) and Time 2 (following a 6 week intervention)

Descriptive reporting of secondary outcomes of reproductive hormone levels (including FSH, E2, LH).

Pharmacokinetic studies were done between Days 9-12 of the menstrual cycle at Time 1 (baseline, before any treatment with herb or placebo), and at Time 2 (intervention, after treatment with herb or placebo).

Weekly means are reported for both time periods at week 0 (day of pharmacokinetic study), week 1 (one week after pharmacokinetic study) and week 2 (2 weeks after pharmacokinetic study).

Time Frame: Time 1 (pre-intervention baseline) and Time 2 (following a 6 week intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patricia A. Murphy, DrPH, College of Nursing, University of Utah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contraception

Clinical Trials on Placebo Control (Placebo Herb)

3
Subscribe