A Randomised Efficacy Study of Combination Antimalarials to Treat Uncomplicated Malaria

November 15, 2006 updated by: University of Cape Town

Open Label Drug Study (With Single and Parallel Group Components) to Evaluate Combination Antimalarial Therapy for Efficacy, Gametocyte Carriage and Molecular Markers Associated With SP Resistance in Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Infections

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus artesunate with that of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on its own for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to anti-malarial drugs is a serious impediment to malaria control. In the South East African Combination Anti-malarial Therapy (SEACAT) evaluation, there is an evaluation of the phased introduction of combination anti-malarial therapy (CAT) in Mozambique, Swaziland and South Africa. In order to facilitate formulation of effective regional drug policy and provide a database for decision-making on the implementation of CAT, it is essential that the in vivo response to CAT be investigated. This will be achieved through the SEACAT 01 protocol which is a component of the SEACAT evaluation described in another file on this website. However, in selected Mozambique sites where the intensity of malaria transmission is high, a direct parallel group comparison of monotherapy (SP) with CAT (artesunate, AS, plus SP) will be conducted according to a specific amendment (Amendment 4) to the SEACAT 01 protocol. Amendment 4 is presented in this separate file on the website for clarity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Namaacha, Mozambique
        • Namaacha Clinic
    • Matutuine
      • Catuane, Matutuine, Mozambique
        • Catuane Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, older than 12 months.
  • Weight > 10 kg.
  • Diagnoses of uncomplicated acute P. falciparum malaria parasitaemia of up to 500 000 asexual parasite/mcl blood with axillary temperature of greater than and equal to 37.50C or history of fever.
  • Documented informed consent.
  • Lives close enough to the health centre for reliable follow up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has received anti-malarial treatment in the past 7 days.
  • Is infected with other malarial species (such subjects will be excluded retrospectively).
  • Severely ill (based on WHO Criteria for severe malaria ) or if patient is considered, in the opinion of the investigator or designee, to have moderately severe malaria (e.g. prostrate, repeated vomiting, dehydrated).
  • Has received cotrimoxazole or chloramphenicol in the past 7 days.
  • History of G6PD deficiency.
  • Is pregnant.
  • Has a history of allergy to any sulphonamide (for SP) or artemisinin derivative (for artesunate and co-artemether).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Parasite clearance time
Fever clearance time
Sensitive or parasitological failure (RI, early and late, RII, RIII)
Therapeutic efficacy defined as: Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR), Early Treatment Failure (ETF), Late Treatment Failure (LTF), defined as Late Clinical Failure (LCF) and Late Parasitological Failure (LPF)
Parasitological failures will be classified as recrudescence or re-infection (or indeterminate) using GLURP and MSP I & II markers

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Association between study treatment and gametocyte carriage
Tolerability by describing adverse events and changes in haematological parameters
Pharmacokinetics by measurement of whole blood levels of Sulfadoxine and Pyrimethamine
Correlation of frequency of DHFR and DHPS mutations with parasitological outcome
Capacity by describing the training and development of study teams

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2003

Study Completion

October 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 20, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 16, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2006

Last Verified

August 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe