Role of PET CT in Determining Target Volumes in Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer

February 4, 2009 updated by: Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Can PET CT Coregistration Imaging Adequately Determine the Gross Tumor Volume and Microscopic Extension in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients for Radical Radiation Therapy?

Radiation therapy is an important part of the treatment for lung cancer when treatment intent is for cure. Radiation is a local modality of treatment, that is, it only treats the area that the radiation can target. Therefore it is critical to be able to visualize all the areas of tumor involvement. With current imaging tests such as computed tomography scans (CT), the scans may not be sensitive enough to detect all areas of cancer involvement but with newer imaging tests, such as positron emission tomography (PET), the investigators may be able to better target all the tumor that the CT scan may miss. There are two clinical trials being conducted by the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)looking at PET in lung cancer. This proposal is a companion study to the OCOG PET lung trials. In brief, this study will evaluate the ability of CT alone versus combined PET CT imaging to determine the size of the tumor (or gross tumor volume) along with the tiny extensions of cancer cells (or microscopic extension). The gross tumor volume and its extension as determined by CT or PET CT will then be compared to measurements made on the surgically removed tumor. Treatment with radiation therapy must include all the gross tumor and its extension in order to be successful for cure. If the radiation treatment does not treat all the identified tumor then the chance for cure is lost. There have only been two previous reports of the ability of CT to determine the gross tumor volume and its extension. There are no similar reports using PET CT. This study will be the first of its kind to evaluate how accurate PET CT can be in detecting the gross tumor and its microscopic extension using the surgically removed tumor measurements as the gold standard. If PET CT is able to more accurately determine the tumor volume including its microscopic extension, then this will help oncologists to better treat lung cancer using more accurate radiation treatment volumes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Radiation therapy is an important component in the curative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Targeting of the gross tumor has been facilitated by the use of CT simulation allowing for more accurate delineation of the tumor. In addition multi-modality imaging combining functional and anatomical information have allowed for further refinement in the treatment planning process with significant impact on the planning target volume due to the addition of PET imaging information. PET using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) allows for more precise detection of tumor since it is a functional image based on glucose metabolism rather than structural abnormalities. Biochemical changes often precede any gross anatomical abnormalities, therefore making PET a very powerful imaging modality. FDG PET has been shown to be more sensitive and specific than CT in the staging of NSCLC.Radical radiation therapy is indicated for early stage NSCLC when the patient is medically inoperable primarily due to co-morbidities. In contrast for locally advanced NSCLC, radical radiation is used as part of induction therapy or in the definitive treatment of NSCLC. In order to avoid a geographical miss with precision radiation therapy, the gross tumor volume (GTV) is outlined and a margin around the GTV is added to incorporate microscopic extension of disease, also known as the clinical target volume (CTV). Standard margins of 1.0 to 1.5 cm are used to encompass the gross tumor, microscopic extent and treatment setup uncertainties.There is surprisingly very little data on what constitutes an adequate margin to encompass the microscopic extent around the gross lung tumor. Studies involving conformal radiation therapy and dose escalation in NSCLC have primarily used an empirical margin to define the CTV. A literature review revealed only two studies evaluating the ability of CT to define the gross tumor and its microscopic extension correlated with histopathological measurements [P Giraud et al 2000, R Chan et al 2001]. The two studies have produced conflicting results with recommended margins being from zero mm to 6-8 mm around the GTV. There have been no studies evaluating the ability of PET to define the size of the gross tumor and its microscopic extension.This is a companion study to the two OCOG PET trials in NSCLC. It will evaluate the ability of CT alone versus PET CT to define the gross tumor and its microscopic extension. The methodology will be based on contouring the GTV with imaging modalities of CT and PET CT and correlating the findings with histopathology.This proposed study will add new information on the ability of combined PET CT to determine the microscopic extension of tumor in NSCLC. While no imaging modality can detect microscopic extension, the newer technology of PET CT may give better resolution over CT alone in the detection of tumor. The strength of this proposal is the required correlation with pathological findings. If PET CT is able to accurately determine the extent of disease, this will have major implications on treatment volumes and subsequent targeting for radiation therapy using 3D conformal radiation therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N3M5
        • Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer
  • Companion clinical trial to OCOG PET Lung trials

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unresectable non-small cell lung cancer
  • Unable to undergo PET CT evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: surgical candidates
surgical candidates who underwent PET CT evaluation
Procedure: Surgical resection
pet ct prior to surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical pathological correlation of PET CT with surgically resected NSCLC
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Collaborators

Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)
Ontario Cancer Research Network

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yee C Ung, MD, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2009

Last Verified

February 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 04-may-00142 OCRN
  • OCRN grant

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Surgical resection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Serbia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe