Efficacy and Safety Study of Everolimus Plus Reduced Cyclosporine Versus Mycophenolic Acid Plus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplant Recipients

April 7, 2011 updated by: Novartis

Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing Concentration-controlled Everolimus in Two Doses (1.5 and 3.0 mg/Day Starting Doses) With Reduced Cyclosporine Versus 1.44 g Mycophenolic Acid (as Sodium Salt) With Standard Dose Cyclosporine in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of three immunosuppressive treatment regimens following a kidney transplant.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

833

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • East Hanover, New Jersey, United States, 07936
        • Novartis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients of any race between 18 to 70 years old (inclusive)
  • Patients who gave written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recipients of multi-organ transplantation
  • Recipients of a primary cadaveric or primary non-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) identical living donor kidney transplantation.
  • Graft cold ischemia time greater than 40 hours.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low-dose Everolimus Group

1.5 mg everolimus (one 0.75-mg tablet bis in diem/twice a day (bid)) + basiliximab + reduced-dose Cyclosporine A (CsA) ± corticosteroids.

The CsA dose was adjusted to attain a trough (C0) value within the pre-specified target ranges: starting at the day 5 visit: 100-200 ng/mL, starting at the month 2 visit: 75-150 ng/mL, starting at the month 4 visit: 50-100 ng/mL and starting at the month 6 visit: 25-50 ng/mL. Patients received their first dose of basiliximab within 2 hours prior to transplant surgery and on day 4 post-transplant or according to local practice. Corticosteroids were administered according to local therapy.

oral, bis in diem/twice a day (bid)
Other Names:
  • Certican, Zotress
CsA dose adjustments were based on CsA trough levels (C0).
Other Names:
  • Neoral
All patients received two 20 mg doses of basiliximab administered intravenously. The first dose was to be given within 2 hours prior to transplant surgery and the second dose was to be administered on day 4, or each dose could have been administered according to local practice.
Other Names:
  • Simulect
Oral corticosteroids were administered according to local practice during the trial. At the same center, all patients were to follow the same steroid administration protocol.
Experimental: High-dose Everolimus Group

3.0 mg everolimus (two 0.75-mg tablets bid) + basiliximab + reduced-dose CsA ± corticosteroids.

The CsA dose was adjusted to attain a trough (C0) value within the pre-specified target ranges: starting at the day 5 visit: 100-200 ng/mL, starting at the month 2 visit: 75-150 ng/mL, starting at the month 4 visit: 50-100 ng/mL and starting at the month 6 visit: 25-50 ng/mL. Patients received their first dose of basiliximab within 2 hours prior to transplant surgery and on day 4 post-transplant or according to local practice. Corticosteroids were administered according to local therapy.

oral, bis in diem/twice a day (bid)
Other Names:
  • Certican, Zotress
CsA dose adjustments were based on CsA trough levels (C0).
Other Names:
  • Neoral
All patients received two 20 mg doses of basiliximab administered intravenously. The first dose was to be given within 2 hours prior to transplant surgery and the second dose was to be administered on day 4, or each dose could have been administered according to local practice.
Other Names:
  • Simulect
Oral corticosteroids were administered according to local practice during the trial. At the same center, all patients were to follow the same steroid administration protocol.
Active Comparator: Control Group

1.44 g Mycophenolic Acid (two 360-mg tablets bid) + basiliximab + standard-dose CsA ± corticosteroids.

The CsA dose was adjusted to attain a C0 value within the following range for the time of the study: starting at the day 5 visit: 200-300 ng/mL, starting at the month 2 visit and thereafter: 100-250 ng/mL. Patients received their first dose of basiliximab within 2 hours prior to transplant surgery and on day 4 post-transplant or according to local practice. Corticosteroids were administered according to local therapy.

CsA dose adjustments were based on CsA trough levels (C0).
Other Names:
  • Neoral
All patients received two 20 mg doses of basiliximab administered intravenously. The first dose was to be given within 2 hours prior to transplant surgery and the second dose was to be administered on day 4, or each dose could have been administered according to local practice.
Other Names:
  • Simulect
Oral corticosteroids were administered according to local practice during the trial. At the same center, all patients were to follow the same steroid administration protocol.
2 oral capsules of mycophenolic acid 360mg administered bid
Other Names:
  • Myfortic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Composite Efficacy Endpoints - 12 Month Analysis
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary efficacy endpoint was the 12 month analysis of primary efficacy failure defined as a composite endpoint including treated biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up. A treated BPAR episode was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III that was treated with anti-rejection therapy. Graft loss was defined as the allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis as well as re-transplant.
12 months
Non-inferiority Analysis on Percentage of Participants With Composite Efficacy Endpoints
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary efficacy endpoint was the 12 month analysis of primary efficacy failure defined as a composite endpoint including treated biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up. In the definition of composite efficacy failure, loss to follow-up includes patients who did not experience treated BPAR, graft loss or death on or after day 1 and whose last day of contact was prior to day 316, the start day of the 12 month visit window.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With the Composite Incidence of Graft Loss, Death or Loss to Follow up at 12 Months Post-transplantation
Time Frame: 12 months

Graft loss was defined as graft loss (the allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis) and re-transplant.

A loss to follow-up patient in the composite endpoint of graft loss, death or loss to follow-up (the main secondary efficacy endpoint) was a patient who did not experience graft loss or death from day 1 and whose last day of contact was prior to study day 316.

12 months
Non-inferiority Analysis of Renal Function, Calculated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) Using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula
Time Frame: at 12 months

Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula is:

GFR [mL/min/1.73m^2] = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R where

  • C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL],
  • A is patient age at sample collection date [years],
  • G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1,
  • R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1
at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 10, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Everolimus

3
Subscribe