Effect of an Educational Intervention on Cardiac Patients' Participation Rate in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs (MECRIS)

October 17, 2017 updated by: Dr. Rachel Dankner, Sheba Medical Center

The Influence of Increasing Awareness of Cardiac Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery to Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) on Actual Participation Rates and; Patients' Related Barriers to CR Programs Participation

The main aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention designed to increase attendance of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients at Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs (CRPs) on actual CRP participation rate and; examine patient-related factors (demographic, health, psychosocial, awareness) influencing patients' attendance at CRPs. We hypothesized that the proportion of CABG patients participating in CRPs will increase significantly to 20-30% following the educational intervention employed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a major cause of disability and economic burden in western societies. Ample evidence exists to suggest that participation of these patients in structured Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs (CRPs) is beneficial in terms of improved prognosis and quality of life. Despite inclusion of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the Medical Insurance Basket (MIB) as a treatment for patients after an acute myocardial infarction (MI), for those after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and more recently for patients suffering from congestive heart failure, only a small proportion (5%-7.5%) of patients take part in CRPs in Israel. Several factors have been identified as barriers to CRP in Israel, two of which are lack of patients motivation to participate in CRPs stemming, in part, from lack of awareness regarding the importance of CR and its availability and; Lack of motivation of medical staff to refer patients to CR resulting from a unawareness of the importance of CR and its availability across Israel, to name a few. The present study accords with such recommendations, by proposing a simple intervention designed to improve patients' and medical staff's awareness to the importance of CR participation. It is expected that CRP participation will significantly increase to 20-30% following the educational intervention employed.

This intervention will provide the basis for the implementation of an intervention to increase CRP participation in cardiac patients at a national level.

In addition to increasing the proportion of CABG patients attending at CRPs, the study aims to measure the effect of CRP participation on subsequent 1-year health and behavior related outcomes, and 3-year mortality. We expect to find differences in outcome measures between participating patients and those who do not.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1024

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ramat Gan, Israel, 52621
        • Sheba Medical Center, the Gertner institute for epidemiology and health service research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with or without valve replacement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Institutionalized patients
  • Patients with severe co-morbidities for whom cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is contra-indicated
  • Patients who sustained a severe surgical complication preventing them from participating in CR (general stroke with severe disability)
  • Patients residing farther than 30 km from a rehabilitation center

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Explanation on cardiac rehabilitation
Intervention: Increasing awareness to cardiac rehabilitation programs: Patients received a written and oral short explanation on the importance and benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation, and information on available programs. They were telephoned 2 weeks after hospital discharge to encourage them to enroll at a cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP). In addition, physicians and nurses at the cardiothoracic units participated in a 1-hour seminar on CR. A recommendation to the general physician to refer the patient to CRP was added to the letter of discharge from hospital.
Increasing awareness to cardiac rehabilitation programs: Before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery patients received a face-to-face explanation on their right to participate in cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) under the Israeli Basket of Health Services; they were also provided with a brochure on the benefits of CRP participation and the availability of CRPs throughout the country.
Other Names:
  • Improving participation at cardiac rehabilitation programs
No Intervention: Usual care with no intervention
Patients recruited to the study received the usual care without any additional explanation on cardiac rehabilitation, and no effort to increase their awareness or the ward's awareness to cardiac rehabilitation was done.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs (CRPs)1-year Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)Surgery in the Intervention and Control Groups
Time Frame: 1 year
The number of cardiac patients who participated in cardiac rehabilitation programs during the year following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in the control and the intervention groups.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MacNew Heart Disease Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Scale. A Self-administered Heart Disease-specific Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Instrument.
Time Frame: 1 year
MacNew questionnaire (MACNEW). A self-administered heart disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) instrument. The MacNew is a modification of the original interviewer-administered Quality of Life after Myocardial Infarction [QLMI] instrument. It addresses three major HRQL domains, the Emotional, Physical, and Social domains which can be combined to give a Global HRQL score. The MacNew consists of 27 items. The total mean score ranges between 1 and 7, where higher score means better HRQL.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular Morbidity
Time Frame: 1 year
All hospitalizations which occured during the 1 year follow-up and were due to acute myocardial infarction (International Classification of Disease 9th version (ICD-9) codes 410.), angina pectoris (ICD-9 codes 413.9), stroke/ transient ischemic attack (TIA) (ICD-9 codes 436.), and all surgical procedures which occured during the 1 year follow-up: CABG or coronary catheterizations (ICD-9 codes 36.), endarterectomies (ICD-9 codes 38.0 and 39.0).
1 year
Biochemical Markers
Time Frame: 1 year
glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Data regarding these biochemical markers was collected from medical available documents at the homes of the patients. In many cases this data was unavailable. Reported values are only available for a subpopulation.
1 year
Medical Service Utilization
Time Frame: 1 year
Visits to the emergency department during the year following CABG surgery
1 year
Anthropometric Measures
Time Frame: 1 year
Measurements of body mass index (BMI)
1 year
Lifestyle Habits (i.e. Smoking)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Employment Status
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of patients fully employed in each arm
1 year
Depression & Anxiety
Time Frame: 1 year
Score in the HADS (hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) screening for anxiety and depression. This is a 14 item scale, 7 items for anxiety and 7 items for depression. Each item can score 0-3 (0=good, 3=bad) and the total score for each scale varies between 0 (no depression/anxiety) to 21 (clinical depression/anxiety requiring medical intervention)
1 year
Physical Activity
Time Frame: 1 year
Self-reported physical activity using a physical activity questionnaire validated in Hebrew. Details of the study validating the instrument: "Development of a Hebrew questionnaire to be used in epidemiological studies to assess physical fitness--validation against sub maximal stress test and predicted VO2max". Ken-Dror G, Lerman Y, Segev S, Dankner R. Harefuah. 2004 Aug;143(8):566-72, 623. Hebrew. PMID: 15523807 VO2max=maximal oxygen uptake
1 year
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 1 year follow up
The pooled mean of 3 blood pressure measurements taken during the interview
1 year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachel Dankner, MD MPH, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Service Research, Sheba Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe