Depression Screening in Patients With Lung Cancer

April 29, 2013 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Maximizing Utilization of Depression Screening in Lung Cancer Patients: A Randomized Trial

RATIONALE: Screening tests may help doctors find depression in patients with lung cancer, allow doctors to recommend treatment for depression, and improve the patient's quality of life.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well depression screening works when the results are or are not shared with patients with lung cancer and their doctor.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the impact of depression screening in patients with lung cancer when the results of the screening are made available to the patient, the physician, both, or neither on detection of depression, provision of depression treatment recommendations, and the quality of the doctor-patient interaction from the patient's perspective.

Secondary

  • Determine psychological and demographic subsets for the impact of depression screening in these patients when the results of the screening are made available to the patient, the physician, both, or neither on the detection of depression, provision of depression treatment recommendations, and the quality of the doctor-patient interaction from the patient's perspective.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, single-blind, factorial study. Patients are stratified according to participating center (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center vs University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 screening arms.

  • Arm I (control): Patients complete screening questionnaires about their mood and experience with lung cancer once before and once after a visit with their physician. Neither the patient nor physician receives the screening results before the visit.
  • Arm II: Patients complete screening questionnaires as in arm I. Only the patient receives the screening results before their visit with the physician; the physician remains blinded to the results.
  • Arm III: Patients complete screening questionnaires as in arm I. Only the physician receives the screening results before their visit with the patient; the patient remains blinded to the results.
  • Arm IV: Patients complete screening questionnaires as in arm I. Both physician and patient receive the screening results before the visit.

All patients and physicians are notified of the screening results before the patient leaves the clinic. All patients are offered supportive counseling.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

241

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536-0093
        • Lucille P. Markey Cancer Center at University of Kentucky
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of lung cancer
  • Prescreening distress thermometer score > 3
  • Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) score ≥ 44

    • No ZSDS response indicating suicidality

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Able to understand English
  • No evidence of cognitive dysfunction that would impair giving consent

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • Not specified

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (control)
Arm I (control): Patients complete screening questionnaires about their mood and experience with lung cancer once before and once after a visit with their physician. Neither the patient nor physician receives the screening results before the visit.
Experimental: Arm II
Arm II: Patients complete screening questionnaires as in arm I. Only the patient receives the screening results before their visit with the physician; the physician remains blinded to the results.
Experimental: Arm III
Arm III: Patients complete screening questionnaires as in arm I. Only the physician receives the screening results before their visit with the patient; the patient remains blinded to the results.
Experimental: Arm IV

Arm IV: Patients complete screening questionnaires as in arm I. Both physician and patient receive the screening results before the visit.

All patients and physicians are notified of the screening results before the patient leaves the clinic. All patients are offered supportive counseling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of treatment recommendations for depression made as measured by checklist of recommendations for depression treatment
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Degree of patient satisfaction with interaction as measured by Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Overall patient experience as measured by Patient Experience Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Psychological and demographic subsets of patients
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William Breitbart, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 28, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe