Effects of Zoledronic Acid and Raloxifene on Bone Turnover Markers in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density

March 25, 2011 updated by: Novartis

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density to Compare the Effects of a Single Dose of i.v. Zoledronic Acid 5 mg, With Daily Oral Raloxifene 60 mg OD on Bone Turnover Markers

This study will compare the effects of Zoledronic acid and Raloxifene in reducing bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density over 6 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85015
        • Women's Health Research
    • California
      • Buena Park, California, United States, 90620
        • Associated Pharma Research Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20036
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32216
        • Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
        • Women's Physicians of Jacksonville
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33624
        • Tampa Clinical Research
    • Illinois
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62703
        • Springfield Clinic
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63131
        • Consultants in Women's Health Care
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68152
        • Alegent Health
    • Nevada
      • Pahrump, Nevada, United States, 89048
        • Specialty Medical and Research Center
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University
    • North Carolina
      • Burlington, North Carolina, United States, 27215
        • Kernodle Clinic, Inc.
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health and Science University
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97205
        • The Portland Clinic
    • Texas
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
        • Texas Institute for Clinical Research
    • Washington
      • Renton, Washington, United States, 98055
        • Valley Women's Health Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females, between 45 and 80 years (inclusive) of age, considered post-menopausal according to one of the following guidelines:
  • Cessation of menses for 18 months in women < 50 years of age
  • Cessation of menses for 12 months in women age 50 years or over
  • Documented bilateral oophorectomy at least 1 year previously
  • Documented T score of less than or equal to -1.5 on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at the lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck within 24 months prior to screening, and clinically indicated for treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs) for osteopenia or osteoporosis
  • Signed informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with i.v. bisphosphonates within the last 2 years
  • Previous use of oral bisphosphonates within the past 2 years (unless used for less than 8 weeks*).
  • *NOTE: If used less than 8 weeks, the washout period is 6 months.
  • Treatment with raloxifene, calcitonin, tibolone or hormone replacement therapy. The washout period for these medications is 6 months prior to randomization.
  • Any treatment with strontium renalate, sodium fluoride or parathyroid hormone
  • Use of systemic high dose corticosteroids at an average dose of ≥ 7.5 mg per day of oral prednisone or equivalent for a period of three months or more within the previous year
  • Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomization
  • Any woman of child bearing potential
  • Patients with fractures occurring within three months prior to randomization
  • History of hypersensitivity to bisphosphonates
  • History of non-traumatic uveitis or iritis, within 2 years prior to study entry.
  • A history of invasive malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the past 12 months prior to screening; excluding, basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, colonic polyps with non-invasive malignancy which have been removed, Ductal Carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) that has been surgically removed, and Carcinoma in-situ (CIS) of the uterine cervix that has been surgically removed.
  • Previous major solid organ transplant recipient or on a transplant waiting list
  • History of hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, Osteogenesis imperfecta, Paget's disease or any metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis
  • Any medical condition which would interfere with the action of the study drug or limit life expectancy to less than 6 months
  • Any medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the participant from adhering to the protocol or completing the trial
  • Active dental infection, unhealed dental extraction or planned oral surgery within 3 month prior to randomization.
  • Calculated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min
  • Greater than 2+ protein on urine dipstick without evidence of contamination or bacteriuria (may be repeated one time, at least a day apart).
  • Serum calcium > 2.75 mmol/L (11.0 mg/dL) or < 2.08 mmol/L (8.3 mg/dL) at screening
  • AST, ALT or serum alkaline phosphatase greater than twice the upper limit of normal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Zoledronic Acid
Zoledronic acid 5 mg (single i.v. infusion) + daily oral placebo for 6 months (zoledronic acid group)
Other Names:
  • Reclast, Aclasta
Active Comparator: Raloxifene
Placebo (single i.v. infusion) + oral raloxifene 60 mg/day for 6 months (raloxifene group)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Urine N-telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (NTx.)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in urine NTx (corrected by creatinine). The primary analysis time point was at 6 months of treatment. The results are reported as nanomoles (nM) of bone collagen equivalents (BCE) per millimole (mM) of urine creatinine.
Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Urine NTx at 2 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months
The results are reported as nanomoles (nM) of bone collagen equivalents (BCE) per millimole (mM) of urine creatinine.
Baseline and 2 months
Change From Baseline in Urine NTx at 4 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months
The results are reported as nanomoles (nM) of bone collagen equivalents (BCE) per millimole (mM) of urine creatinine.
Baseline and 4 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 2 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months
Baseline and 2 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 4 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months
Baseline and 4 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Baseline and 6 months
Overall Principal Investigator Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Immediately after infusion procedure
The investigator was asked to complete satisfaction questionnaires at baseline (Visit 2/Day 1) when each patient's i.v. drug administration occurred. The questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction with the i.v. infusion procedure. The possible answers to the question were: "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "quite," or "completely."
Immediately after infusion procedure
Overall Nurse Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Immediately after infusion procedure
The study coordinator (nurse) was asked to complete satisfaction questionnaires at baseline (Visit 2/Day 1) when each patient's i.v. drug administration occurred. The questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction with the i.v. infusion procedure. The possible answers to the question were: "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "quite," or "completely."
Immediately after infusion procedure
Overall Patient Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Immediately after infusion procedure
Patients were asked to complete the satisfaction questionnaire at baseline. The questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction with the i.v. infusion procedure. The possible answers to the question were: "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "quite," or "completely."
Immediately after infusion procedure
Patient Preference at 6 Months for Annual i.v Therapy or Daily Oral Regimens
Time Frame: At 6 month visit
At the end-of-study visit, Month 6, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire to assess preference for the different treatment modalities (annual i.v. infusion vs. daily oral capsule). The possible answers to question were: "once a year i.v. infusion," "once daily pill," or "both are equal."
At 6 month visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe