Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Metvix® 160 Milligrams/Gram Cream in Organ Transplant Participants With Non-melanoma Skin Cancer

March 31, 2025 updated by: Galderma R&D

A Multicenter, Randomized Study of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Metvix® 160 mg/g Cream in Immuno-compromised Patients With Non-melanoma Skin Cancer

Participants on immunosuppressive therapy, e.g., organ recipients, had higher occurrence of AK (Actinic Keratosis) than the untreated population. Keratotic lesions (i.e., AK lesions and warts) in this population were highly associated with development of SCC (Squamous Cell Carcinoma) also with 10 times higher mortality rate because of SCC than expected. The risk of developing skin cancer, predominantly SCC and BCC (Basal Cell Carcinoma), increased with graft survival time and the length of immunosuppressive treatment period.

The higher risk of developing skin malignancy and more aggressive skin malignancies in this population, indicated the need for early removal of these pre-malignant lesions.

In this study, two contralateral areas (5x10 cm^2) with skin lesions within the participant were compared. One area was received Metvix PDT at defined intervals and the other was received lesion specific treatment at the discretion of the investigator. The primary endpoint was the accumulated number of new lesions during the study and number of AK lesions that showed complete response 3 months after baseline. Secondary endpoints were number of BCC lesions that showed complete response, number of recurrent lesions, assessment of cosmetic outcome and safety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The treatment area (5x10 cm^2) was treated at baseline and at 3 ,9 and 15 months visits. At baseline, the area was treated with fractionated Metvix® PDT treatment consisting of two treatment one week apart and at 3 ,9 and 15 months visits with single Metvix® PDT treatment. The participants were evaluated for occurrence of new lesions, lesion response and recurrence at 3 (not recurrence),9,15,21, and 27 months visits. New and recurrent lesions in the treated area were treated with Metvix® PDT treatment. Lesions with partial response in the treated area were re-treated with Metvix® PDT and lesions with no response were treated with lesion specific treatment at the discretion of the investigator.

In the contralateral control area (5x10 cm^2), new and recurrent lesions and lesions in non-complete response were treated with lesion specific treatment at the discretion of the investigator at each study visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Roskilde, Denmark, 4000
        • Department of Dermatology, Roskilde Amysygehus
      • Århus, Denmark, 8000
        • Department of Dermatology, Århus Amysygehus
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Campus Charité Mitte
      • Hannover, Germany, 30449
        • Hautklinik Linden
      • Oslo, Norway, 0027
        • Department of Dermatology, Rikshospitalet
      • Trondheim, Norway, 7006
        • Department of Dermatology, St. Olavs Hospital
      • Gothenburg, Sweden, 41345
        • Department of Dermatology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 14186
        • Department of Dermatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge
      • Uppsala, Sweden, 75185
        • Department of Dermatology, Uppsala University Hospital
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Dermatology Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary
      • Portsmouth, United Kingdom, PO3 6AD
        • Portsmouth Dermatology Centre, St Mary's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Transplant recipients with at least 2 clinically diagnosed AK lesion and maximum 10 skin lesions (AK, BCC, SCC in situ and/or warts) in each of the two contralateral areas (diameter 5x10^2 cm) in the face, the scalp, the extremities or on the trunk/neck.
  • Transplant recipients who previously were treated more than once for their skin lesions.
  • Transplant recipients who had received immunosuppressive therapy for more than 3 years.
  • Males or females above 18 years of age.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with more than 10 skin lesions (AK, BCC, SCC in situ, warts) in one of the two areas.
  • Participants with SCC (not SCC in situ) in one of the two areas.
  • Participants not previously treated or treated only once for their skin lesions.
  • Participants with rosacea in one of the two areas.
  • Participants with morphea form/highly infiltrating BCC
  • Known allergy to methyl-amino levulinate, a similar compound or excipients of the cream
  • Participation in other clinical studies either concurrently or within the last 30 days.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding (all women of child-bearing potential documented a negative pregnancy test and used the pill or IUD during the treatments and for at least one month thereafter).
  • Conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Metvix®-PDT (Treatment Area +Contralateral Control Area)
Two contralateral areas (symmetrically) were identified with an area of 5*10-centimeter square, that is (i.e.), treatment and control area. Treatment area was treated with Metvix®-photodynamic therapy (PDT) 160 milligrams/gram (mg/g) cream, given as fractioned regimen consisting of two treatments one week apart on Weeks 0 and Week 1, additional single treatments were given at Months 3, 9, 15, 21 and 27. The contralateral control area was treated using lesion-specific treatment in accordance with the Investigator's preference (example, cryotherapy) at months 3, 9, 15, 21 and 27.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Accumulated New Skin Lesions at Month 3
Time Frame: At Month 3
A new lesion was defined as a visible new lesion of any size after the Baseline. New skin lesions accumulated were sum of actinic keratoses (AK) lesions, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) lesions and warts in treated area and contralateral control area (symmetrically). Number of accumulated new skin lesions at Month 3 were reported.
At Month 3
Number of Accumulated New Skin Lesions at Month 9
Time Frame: At Month 9
A new lesion was defined as a visible new lesion of any size after the Baseline. New skin lesions accumulated were sum of AK lesions, BCC lesions, SCC lesions and warts in treated area and contralateral control area (symmetrically). Number of accumulated new skin lesions at Month 9 were reported.
At Month 9
Number of Accumulated New Skin Lesions at Month 15
Time Frame: At Month 15
A new lesion was defined as a visible new lesion of any size after the Baseline. New skin lesions accumulated were sum of AK lesions, BCC lesions, SCC lesions and warts in treated area and contralateral control area (symmetrically). Number of accumulated new skin lesions at Month 15 were reported.
At Month 15
Number of Accumulated New Skin Lesions at Month 21
Time Frame: At Month 21
A new lesion was defined as a visible new lesion of any size after the Baseline. New skin lesions accumulated were sum of AK lesions, BCC lesions, SCC lesions and warts in treated area and contralateral control area (symmetrically). Number of accumulated new skin lesions at Month 21 were reported.
At Month 21
Number of Accumulated New Skin Lesions at Month 27
Time Frame: At Month 27
A new lesion was defined as a visible new lesion of any size after the Baseline. New skin lesions accumulated were sum of AK lesions, BCC lesions, SCC lesions and warts in treated area and contralateral control area (symmetrically). Number of accumulated new skin lesions at Month 27 were reported.
At Month 27
Number of AK Lesions That Showed Complete Response at Month 3
Time Frame: At Month 3
Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion. The AK lesions were graded as grade 1(mild); slightly palpable AK, better felt than seen, grade 2 (moderate); moderately thick AK, easily felt and seen, and grade 3 (severe); very thick and/or obvious AK. Mantel-Haenszel weighted difference was used to calculate number of AK lesions that showed complete response.
At Month 3
Number of AK Lesions That Showed Complete Response at Month 9
Time Frame: At Month 9
Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion. The AK lesions were graded as grade 1(mild); slightly palpable AK, better felt than seen, grade 2 (moderate); moderately thick AK, easily felt and seen, and grade 3 (severe); very thick and/or obvious AK. Mantel-Haenszel weighted difference was used to calculate number of AK lesions that showed complete response.
At Month 9
Number of AK Lesions That Showed Complete Response at Month 15
Time Frame: At Month 15
Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion. The AK lesions were graded as grade 1(mild); slightly palpable AK, better felt than seen, grade 2 (moderate); moderately thick AK, easily felt and seen, and grade 3 (severe); very thick and/or obvious AK. Mantel-Haenszel weighted difference was used to calculate number of AK lesions that showed complete response.
At Month 15
Number of AK Lesions That Showed Complete Response at Month 21
Time Frame: At Month 21
Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion. The AK lesions were graded as grade 1(mild); slightly palpable AK, better felt than seen, grade 2 (moderate); moderately thick AK, easily felt and seen, and grade 3 (severe); very thick and/or obvious AK. Mantel-Haenszel weighted difference was used to calculate number of AK lesions that showed complete response.
At Month 21
Number of AK Lesions That Showed Complete Response at Month 27
Time Frame: At Month 27
Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion. The AK lesions were graded as grade 1(mild); slightly palpable AK, better felt than seen, grade 2 (moderate); moderately thick AK, easily felt and seen, and grade 3 (severe); very thick and/or obvious AK. Mantel-Haenszel weighted difference was used to calculate number of AK lesions that showed complete response.
At Month 27

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of BCC Lesions That Showed Complete Response
Time Frame: At Months 3, 9, 15, 21 and 27
Complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of the lesion. BCC lesions were characterized as superficial: ill-defined red scaly macule; could increase in size to form crusted, occasionally ulcerated, scaly erythematous patches, but never indurated and nodular: flesh-colored, cream to pink, waxy papule with prominent surface telangiectasias; as the lesions grow, central erosion or ulceration and crusting occur, surrounded by a pearly, rolled, translucent border. Number of BCC lesions that showed complete response was reported.
At Months 3, 9, 15, 21 and 27
Number of Recurrent Lesions
Time Frame: At Months 9, 15, 21 and 27
Recurrence of lesions was defined as reappearance of previously treated and eradicated lesions and was verified by histology in accordance with local hospital practice.
At Months 9, 15, 21 and 27
Number of Participants With Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator and Participants
Time Frame: At Month 27
Overall cosmetic outcome for the two contralateral areas (treatment and contralateral control) with an area of 5 by 10 cm^2 was assessed with regards to either absence or presence of all signs or symptoms or the presence of at least one of the signs or symptoms; scarring, atrophy, depigmentation, redness and fibrosis by both investigator and participant. Parameters were assessed for each area were hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, scar formation and tissue defect. The occurrence of these parameters was graded as none, slight, or obvious. Cosmetic outcome was presented as number of participants in each category (none, slight, obvious) for each variable assessed (hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, scar formation, tissue defect).
At Month 27
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline up to Month 27
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
From Baseline up to Month 27

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann-Marie Wennberg, MD, PhD, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 25, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

May 11, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe