A Study of Fuzeon (Enfuvirtide) With an Integrase Inhibitor Plus Optimized Background in Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Infected Patients (AMICI)

July 18, 2011 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Multicenter, Open-label Study Evaluating the Antiviral Activity and Safety of Enfuvirtide (ENF) Once Daily (QD) or Twice Daily (BID) in Triple-class Experienced HIV-1 Infected Patients Changing Their Therapy to a Standard of Care (SOC) Regimen That Includes Initiating Raltegravir Plus an Optimized Background (OB) Antiviral Regimen

This 2-arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Fuzeon with an integrase inhibitor in an expanded access program plus an optimized background antiviral regimen (AVR) in HIV-1 infected patients naive to Fuzeon and an integrase inhibitor. In the first cohort phase of the study (Phase I), eligible patients received Fuzeon 90 mg subcutaneously (SC) twice daily until confirmation of response (min/max = 8/16 weeks). In Phase II, the randomised comparator phase of the study, responders were randomized to receive Fuzeon either 90 mg SC twice a day or 180 mg SC once a day for a further 16 weeks. Non-responders and virological failures were terminated from the study. The anticipated time on study treatment was 3-9 months, and the target sample size was 210 individuals.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ponce, Puerto Rico, 00717-1563
      • Santurce, Puerto Rico, 00909
    • Alabama
      • Hobson City, Alabama, United States, 36201
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90036
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90028
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90069
      • Modesto, California, United States, 95350
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20009
    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33334
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33307
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 39912
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33133
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33139
      • North Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33408
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
      • Plantation, Florida, United States, 33317
      • Port St Lucie, Florida, United States, 34952
      • Safety Harbor, Florida, United States, 36495
      • South Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
      • Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60657
    • Maryland
      • Silver Spring, Maryland, United States, 20910
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215-3318
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63139
    • New Jersey
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07102
    • New York
      • Briarcliff Manor, New York, United States, 10510
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467-2490
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14604
    • Pennsylvania
      • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States, 18102-7017
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
      • Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19601
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77098
    • Virginia
      • Annandale, Virginia, United States, 22003

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, >=18 years of age
  • HIV-1 infection
  • Triple class treatment-experienced, Fuzeon- and integrase-inhibitor naive
  • GSS >= 3 ; nucleosides excluded

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adverse clinical or laboratory experience >ACTG Grade 4
  • Untreated infection, intercurrent illness, drug toxicity or other condition contraindicating an antiretroviral regimen
  • Malignancy requiring chemotherapy or radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phase I
Phase 1: ENF 90mg SC BID): In the first phase or cohort phase of day I-1 through Week I-12 of the trial all patients received enfuvirtide (ENF) 90 mg subcutaneously (SC) twice daily (BID) + Isentress® [raltegravir] (RAL) 400-mg orally (PO) BID + optimized background (OB) with at least 1 fully active antiretroviral (ARV) agent excluding nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs).
90 mg SC twice daily
As prescribed
As prescribed
180 mg SC once daily
Experimental: Phase II

In the randomized comparator Phase II of the trial- (Day II-1 through Week II-16): Virologic responders confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≤50 copies/mL from Phase I were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms of

(Phase II Arm A: Phase I then ENF 90mg SC BID): ENF 90 mg SC BID + RAL 400 mg PO BID + OB with at least 1 fully active ARV agent excluding NRTIs or (Phase II Arm B: Phase I then ENF 180mg SC QD): ENF 180 mg SC once daily (QD) + RAL 400 mg PO BID + OB with at least 1 fully active ARV agent excluding NRTIs.

90 mg SC twice daily
As prescribed
As prescribed
180 mg SC once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients in Phase I of the Study With a Confirmed HIV-1 RNA Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mL
Time Frame: Between Week I-4 and Week I-12 of Phase I of the study
Virologic responders were defined as patients who had an initial HIV-1 RNA assessment <= 50 copies/mL during Phase I at any visit between Week I-4 and Week I-12 and a confirmatory viral load assessment ≤ 50 copies/mL at the next visit (Week I-8 to Week II-16)
Between Week I-4 and Week I-12 of Phase I of the study
Number of Patients in Phase II of the Study With HIV-1 RNA ≤ 50 Copies/mL at Week II-16
Time Frame: Week II-16
Week II-16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Virologic Response Over Time in Phase I of the Study
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8 & 12
The number of intent-to-treat (ITT) participants with HIV-1 RNA <= 50 copies/mL and HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL by study week are summarized below.
Weeks 4, 8 & 12
HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Change From Baseline in Phase I of the Study
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 & LOCF
Change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA (log10 copies/mL) at study Weeks I-4, 8, 12 & LOCF for ITT patients in Phase I of the study
Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12 & LOCF
Virologic Response Over Time in Phase II of the Study
Time Frame: Weeks II-4, 8, 12 & 16
The number of intent-to-treat (ITT) participants with HIV-1 RNA <= 50 copies/mL and HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL by study week.
Weeks II-4, 8, 12 & 16
CD4+ Lymphocyte Count Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Phase I Baseline and Phase II Weeks II-1, 12, 16, and LOCF

Change from study Phase I baseline in CD4+ lymphocyte count at Phase II study Weeks II - 1, 12, 16, and LOCF by treatment arm.

Change from study Phase II baseline in CD4+ lymphocyte count at Phase II study weeks II - 12 and 16.

Phase I Baseline and Phase II Weeks II-1, 12, 16, and LOCF
Percentage of Patients With Ongoing Injection Site Reactions (ISRs)
Time Frame: Phase I and II
Phase I and II

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2011

Last Verified

July 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on enfuvirtide [Fuzeon]

3
Subscribe