Traditional vs. Graft-augmented Posterior Colporrhaphy

January 22, 2021 updated by: University of California, Irvine

Traditional vs. Graft-augmented Posterior Colporrhaphy: A Randomized Prospective Study

Women who undergo posterior colporrhaphy with graft augmentation will have a lower recurrence of their posterior wall defect than women who undergo a traditional posterior colporrhaphy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The traditional approach to surgical repair of posterior wall defect is the posterior colporrhaphy. Although this technique has been successful in the anatomic correction of the defect, the functional outcomes have been disappointing. This fact suggests improvement in the functional and anatomic outcomes following a traditional posterior colporrhaphy. Consequently, the idea of incorporating graft material into the repair to augment the patient's own tissue has been examined. Placing a piece of graft material in between the vagina and rectum adds an extra layer of support and thus augments the strength of the repair. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the anatomic and functional outcomes of posterior compartment, graft-augmented traditional posterior colporrhaphy vs. traditional posterior colporrhaphy alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • University of California, Irvine Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Posterior wall defect with point Ap or Bp at 0 or greater
  • Desires surgical correction
  • Willing to accept randomization to graft vs. no graft
  • Competent to sign an informed consent
  • Completed childbearing
  • Non-pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current anal sphincter disruption with planned incontinent surgical repairs
  • Poor surgical candidate
  • History of rectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease
  • Current rectovaginal
  • History of vaginal cancer
  • History of vaginal/pelvic radiation
  • Foreshortened vagina
  • Previous adverse reaction to Xenform matrix graft material

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1
Posterior repair with graft augmentation.
Patients will undergo randomized surgical procedure. Patients will be seen at 6 weeks for a pelvic exam and evaluation of the posterior wall. Points Ap and Bp will be recorded with values at 0.5cm intervals being on the posterior vaginal wall that is 3cm above the hymen. Point Bp is the most dependent portion of the posterior vaginal wall when the patient performs a Valsalva maneuver. Patients will be seen at 6 months for a pelvic exam evaluation of posterior wall support and completion of SF-36, PISQ and FISI. Patients will be given 60 minute Questionnaires on defecatory dysfunction, pelvic pain and/or symptoms of prolapse. Patients will be seen at 1 year and yearly intervals up to five years for a pelvic exam for evaluation of posterior wall support and the questionnaires.
Other Names:
  • Xenform® material
Other: 2
Posterior repair without graft augmentation.
Patients will undergo randomized surgical procedure. Patients will be seen at 2 weeks for routine post-op care and evaluation of any post-op complications. Patients will be seen at 6 weeks for a pelvic exam and evaluation of the posterior wall. Points Ap and Bp will be recorded with values at 0.5cm intervals being on the posterior vaginal wall that is 3cm above the hymen. Point Bp is the most dependent portion of the posterior vaginal wall when the patient performs a Valsalva maneuver. Patients will be seen at 6 months, for a pelvic exam evaluation of posterior wall support and completion of SF-36, PISQ and FISI. Patients will be given 60 minute Questionnaires on defecatory dysfunction, pelvic pain and/or symptoms of prolapse. Patients will be seen at 1 year and yearly intervals up to five years to have a pelvic exam for evaluation of posterior wall support and the questionnaires.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome of recurrence of stage II posterior wall defects will be measured using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification exam (POPQ).
Time Frame: 5 Years
5 Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The secondary outcomes will be measuring the effects of the surgical repair on various aspects of life using a series of questionnaires: SF-36 as a measure of quality of life, PISQ to measure sexual function, and FISI to measure rectal function.
Time Frame: 5 Years
5 Years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen L Noblett, M.D., University of California, Irvine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 11, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

October 11, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 27, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Graft-augmented colporrhaphy

3
Subscribe